http://uncleyap-kh.blogspot.com/2010/03/blog-post.html
<!-- Begin #content --> <!-- Begin #main --> Wednesday, March 10, 2010
<!-- Begin .post --> 缅甸军人政权依样画葫芦，抄袭李家王朝下三烂政治惯技！
相关国际新闻链接
根据以上新闻，缅甸的混帐军人政权已经颁布新法令，以便禁止著名反对派的翁山淑枝参与今年将举行的大选。这些破烂下流的政治伎俩简直是复制了李家王朝的惯技，也就是自己烂挑藉口来使对手失去竞选的资格，以便宣布自己《胜利获选》。简直是无耻；不要脸！
这些下三烂藉口，几乎千篇一律的是指自己的对手犯了罪，所以失去参加竞选的资格。反什么罪呢？就是犯了这些无赖政权专门为自己所设立来陷害对手的莫须有罪名。
在新加坡和缅甸的无赖政权都是乌鸦一般黑。手法和伎俩都是同出一撤，有样学样，猩猩学猴子的毫无新意。目的只有一个，司马昭之心路人皆知，全是狼心狗肺的产物。他们腐败无能不要脸，无法光明正大的对付自己的主要对手，就只永远倚赖这类的流氓瘪三手段。丢脸丢到底。永远受全世界的耻笑和鄙视。
像这些一辈子搞这种勾当的浑球，世人必须把握机会，付出代价，把他们推翻然后处以严厉的惩罚，以便教育国家下一代人民，比为将来的混帐们建立一个警戒；教训；和历史上的榜样。如果让他们逃过惩罚就太便宜了。
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/87ee8eaa-2c16-11df-9187-00144feabdc0.html
New laws bar Suu Kyi from election
By Tim Johnston in Ho Chi Minh City
Published: March 10 2010 08:51 | Last updated: March 10 2010 08:51
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript"> function floatContent(){var paraNum = "3" paraNum = paraNum - 1;var tb = document.getElementById('floating-con');var nl = document.getElementById('floating-target');if(tb.getElementsByTagName("div").length> 0){if (nl.getElementsByTagName("p").length>= paraNum){nl.insertBefore(tb,nl.getElementsByTagName("p")[paraNum]);}else {if (nl.getElementsByTagName("p").length == 3){nl.insertBefore(tb,nl.getElementsByTagName("p")[2]);}else {nl.insertBefore(tb,nl.getElementsByTagName("p")[0]);}}}}</script>Burma has published new election laws that will bar Aung San Suu Kyi, the imprisoned opposition leader and Nobel laureate, from standing in polls this year or even continuing as a member of the party she leads.
The move will put advocates of engagement with Burma, including the Obama administration, in a difficult position. Those arguing for a new approach to Burma say that years of economic sanctions have been unproductive and allowed China to gain undue influence.
Advocates have looked for hopeful signs in Burma’s plan to return later this year to at least nominal civilian rule with the first legislative elections in two decades.
The ruling junta has said that it adopted five new electoral laws this week, but has so far released details on only two. The new laws put the National League for Democracy, Ms Suu Kyi’s party, in an awkward position.
The party was already undecided about whether to take part in the planned election and would now stand to lose Mrs Suu Kyi, its biggest draw. The party has said that it is deeply unhappy with the constitution that the junta adopted in 2007, which guarantees the military 25 per cent of the seats in parliament and almost ensures that the president will be drawn from the ranks of the army.
The Political Parties Registration Law bars any convicted lawbreaker from being a member of a political party, let alone standing for office. Mrs Suu Kyi, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1991, was found guilty last year of breaching the terms of her house arrest after John Yettaw, an American tourist, swam across the lake behind her house and spent the night.
The new law gives the National League and other parties 60 days to register.
”We would like to see steps taken by the government to encourage domestic dialogue in anticipation and in advance of the elections,” said Kurt Campbell, the top US official responsible for Asia, on Wednesday in Malaysia in remarks reported by the French news agency AFP. ”I think it would be fair to say what we have seen so far is disappointing and regrettable.”
The National League won an overwhelming victory when polls were last held in 1990 only to have the army annul the results and imprison many of those elected. Ms Suu Kyi has spent 14 of the intervening 20 years under house arrest.
During her trial last year, Ms Suu Kyi argued that because Mr Yettaw had not been invited and that the law under which she had been sentenced had been superseded, she should be released. The Supreme Court in Rangoon rejected her appeal last month.
She was sentenced to a further 18 months under house arrest, a punishment that will keep her out of public life until after the ballot is held.
No date has been set for the vote but it is expected to take place in the last quarter of this year.
The new laws are part of the long-awaited enabling legislation for the final stage in the country’s seven-step transition to “discipline-flourishing democracy” in the words of the generals who run the country.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2010. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.
<!-- Begin #content --> <!-- Begin #main --> Wednesday, March 10, 2010
<!-- Begin .post --> 缅甸军人政权依样画葫芦，抄袭李家王朝下三烂政治惯技！
相关国际新闻链接
根据以上新闻，缅甸的混帐军人政权已经颁布新法令，以便禁止著名反对派的翁山淑枝参与今年将举行的大选。这些破烂下流的政治伎俩简直是复制了李家王朝的惯技，也就是自己烂挑藉口来使对手失去竞选的资格，以便宣布自己《胜利获选》。简直是无耻；不要脸！
这些下三烂藉口，几乎千篇一律的是指自己的对手犯了罪，所以失去参加竞选的资格。反什么罪呢？就是犯了这些无赖政权专门为自己所设立来陷害对手的莫须有罪名。
在新加坡和缅甸的无赖政权都是乌鸦一般黑。手法和伎俩都是同出一撤，有样学样，猩猩学猴子的毫无新意。目的只有一个，司马昭之心路人皆知，全是狼心狗肺的产物。他们腐败无能不要脸，无法光明正大的对付自己的主要对手，就只永远倚赖这类的流氓瘪三手段。丢脸丢到底。永远受全世界的耻笑和鄙视。
像这些一辈子搞这种勾当的浑球，世人必须把握机会，付出代价，把他们推翻然后处以严厉的惩罚，以便教育国家下一代人民，比为将来的混帐们建立一个警戒；教训；和历史上的榜样。如果让他们逃过惩罚就太便宜了。
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/87ee8eaa-2c16-11df-9187-00144feabdc0.html
New laws bar Suu Kyi from election
By Tim Johnston in Ho Chi Minh City
Published: March 10 2010 08:51 | Last updated: March 10 2010 08:51
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript"> function floatContent(){var paraNum = "3" paraNum = paraNum - 1;var tb = document.getElementById('floating-con');var nl = document.getElementById('floating-target');if(tb.getElementsByTagName("div").length> 0){if (nl.getElementsByTagName("p").length>= paraNum){nl.insertBefore(tb,nl.getElementsByTagName("p")[paraNum]);}else {if (nl.getElementsByTagName("p").length == 3){nl.insertBefore(tb,nl.getElementsByTagName("p")[2]);}else {nl.insertBefore(tb,nl.getElementsByTagName("p")[0]);}}}}</script>Burma has published new election laws that will bar Aung San Suu Kyi, the imprisoned opposition leader and Nobel laureate, from standing in polls this year or even continuing as a member of the party she leads.
The move will put advocates of engagement with Burma, including the Obama administration, in a difficult position. Those arguing for a new approach to Burma say that years of economic sanctions have been unproductive and allowed China to gain undue influence.
Advocates have looked for hopeful signs in Burma’s plan to return later this year to at least nominal civilian rule with the first legislative elections in two decades.
The ruling junta has said that it adopted five new electoral laws this week, but has so far released details on only two. The new laws put the National League for Democracy, Ms Suu Kyi’s party, in an awkward position.
The party was already undecided about whether to take part in the planned election and would now stand to lose Mrs Suu Kyi, its biggest draw. The party has said that it is deeply unhappy with the constitution that the junta adopted in 2007, which guarantees the military 25 per cent of the seats in parliament and almost ensures that the president will be drawn from the ranks of the army.
The Political Parties Registration Law bars any convicted lawbreaker from being a member of a political party, let alone standing for office. Mrs Suu Kyi, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1991, was found guilty last year of breaching the terms of her house arrest after John Yettaw, an American tourist, swam across the lake behind her house and spent the night.
The new law gives the National League and other parties 60 days to register.
”We would like to see steps taken by the government to encourage domestic dialogue in anticipation and in advance of the elections,” said Kurt Campbell, the top US official responsible for Asia, on Wednesday in Malaysia in remarks reported by the French news agency AFP. ”I think it would be fair to say what we have seen so far is disappointing and regrettable.”
The National League won an overwhelming victory when polls were last held in 1990 only to have the army annul the results and imprison many of those elected. Ms Suu Kyi has spent 14 of the intervening 20 years under house arrest.
During her trial last year, Ms Suu Kyi argued that because Mr Yettaw had not been invited and that the law under which she had been sentenced had been superseded, she should be released. The Supreme Court in Rangoon rejected her appeal last month.
She was sentenced to a further 18 months under house arrest, a punishment that will keep her out of public life until after the ballot is held.
No date has been set for the vote but it is expected to take place in the last quarter of this year.
The new laws are part of the long-awaited enabling legislation for the final stage in the country’s seven-step transition to “discipline-flourishing democracy” in the words of the generals who run the country.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2010. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.
