• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

“Rafflesian” doesn't mean PERFECT.

Les grossman

Alfrescian
Loyal

By RI student Law May Ning

A couple of days ago, my family and I ended up babysitting my 3 year old cousin. Decked in a baby blue dress and a matching pseudo-pearl necklace, the irresistibly adorable little girl pranced into the house and waved at me. “P-ween-cess,” she mumbled happily, pointing to the Snow White plastered on the front of her dress, a shy smile on her face.


“Aww… Meimei so pretty,” I responded.

Her face lit up.

“Meimei p-wee-ty,” she repeated proudly, her happy eyes filled with that simple belief.

The sheer conviction of her statement made me think: Just when do we stop believing in ourselves like that?


Self-esteem is a touchy subject-especially for girls, as research has shown.Which girl hasn’t honestly felt, or at very least heard, the barrage of “I’m ugly” denunciations? While a disproportionate focus seems to be placed on the contributions of external factors in constructing our self-image, ultimately, one questions how much less significant individual mindset is. Overly disparaging peers and the pernicious media are, indisputably, important factors, but is our biggest critic in fact ourselves?

It is highly improbable, given the sheer ubiquity of these issues, that every single person who has ever felt bad about him or herself did so only as a consequence of a caustic comment. For every condemnation, we do receive a fair share of encouraging words from family and friends – yet, a single “you’re fat” results in a crushing blow while “that’s pretty,” is met with scepticism, perhaps from a mixture of humility and habit. Beyond leaving us the tendency to look only at the bad, overt modesty sometimes translates into negating any compliment altogether.

And in the Rafflesian context, this mental self-flagellation extends beyond appearances.

The issue of intelligence is one that touches the hearts of all Rafflesians. By virtue of the simple fact that one bears the label, there are expectations, societal and personal, of a certain level of intellectual competency. Alas, what exactly this level may be is nebulous at best, and the yardstick by which it is measured is as equally subjective. There is a blurred line between being exam smart, which an entrance to the Rafflesian family would presuppose, and being intelligent in terms of learning fast. It is difficult to judge which is more helpful than the other in our society. However, what it does mean, is that even within our little bubbled sphere, there will be inevitable differences in the way people address things – and the amount of effort needed to digest concepts. Intellectual giftedness may not always equate to good results. But being exam smart probably requires a certain amount of effort to sustain those stellar grades, the easiest available measure of this dubious intellectual standard.

If one isn’t amongst the gifted few breezing school with little effort, it is easy to doubt one’s self-worth. One of the very assumptions of being a Rafflesian is rendered invalid, and part of one’s identity becomes compromised. Feelings of inadequacy are a natural result.

We need to put things in perspective.

In our not altogether avoidable obsession with not being left behind, we are occasionally blind to the nuances associated with “being intelligent”. Is the measure that matters to us really the one on a piece of paper? And what more of different types of intelligences, such as the obvious Science-Arts distinction, the more subtle musical intelligences, social intelligences, even athletic intelligence? Ball-sense and being able to coordinate hand-eye movement is not something gifted to all, as many of us can easily vouch for. What does being intelligent really mean?

And, the equally big question: To be considered “good” in something, do we have to be better than everyone else?​

More at https://www.domainofexperts.com/2013/12/rafflesian-doesnt-mean-perfect.html
 

Byebye Penis

Alfrescian
Loyal
rafflesian only do trusted in civil and uniform service.

in private sector, rafflesians are flagged for integrity issues and less likely to be trusted. They are good at covering up dirty secrets.
 

True Believer

Alfrescian
Loyal
rafflesian only do trusted in civil and uniform service. in private sector, rafflesians are flagged for integrity issues and less likely to be trusted. They are good at covering up dirty secrets.
Intelligent people know how to legalise matters to make them look above board such as deciding their own humongous wages by benchmarking them to the top earners in the private sector.
 

Timerty

Alfrescian
Loyal
Raffles = Robot
A rafflesian can do best what a robot does .

No nobel prize. Just ten years series whore.
 
Top