• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

HK Housing Nightmare!!

TeeKee

Alfrescian
Loyal
Hong Kong’s property speculators create housing nightmare

Monday, 26 October 2009.
Public house-building cut by half • One in nine construction workers unemployed • Luxury apartment sold for world record 57 million US dollars

Vinent Kolo, chinaworker.info

“The Hong Kong government is turning a blind eye to this problem and it will lead to social unrest.” This is what one protester told chinaworker.info on Sunday 25 October, as around 300 angry citizens marched in a protest against the sky-high cost of housing. Hong Kong is Asia’s most expensive city outside Japan. To find out why you must look at the property sector. Labour is cheap in Hong Kong, but accommodation and business rents costs the earth. The reason for this is the stanglehold that a cabal of property developers and speculators have over the economy and a pliant government which serves them the land – sometimes free of charge!

The developers have become hate objects among growing layers of ordinary people as more and more examples crop up of law-bending (if not breaking) and blatantly dishonest marketing tricks. As Craig Stephens of Market Watch comments, “Not only do they operate in an oligopolistic market with squeezed supply, it seems they can make up the rules of the property game as they please.”

Average house prices in Hong Kong’s ‘mass market’ have shot up by 27 percent this year, while prices in the luxury sector are up over 40 percent! This is the result of furious speculation including “hot money” from outside, and low interest rates under government ‘stimulus’ arrangements. Yet despite the price surge, the government of Donald Tsang denies there is a bubble or indeed even a problem.

“Donald Tsang’s claim that the price of property is still lower than it was in 1997 is simply cold-blooded,” said the organiser of Sunday’s protest, Caring Hong Kong convener Kwok Ka-ki. “Action must be taken before the property market returns to that absolutely insane level.”

Similar warnings are being issued by financial commentators. The supply of new apartments in Hong Kong – with the government controlled sector virtually “on strike” – has slowed to the lowest level in five years. “Limited new supply and low interest rates encourage investors to enter the property market for investment,” said Eric Wong Chun-yu of UBS [South China Morning Post, 24 October].

The term “investment” here is a euphemism for “speculation”.

Bubble – again

In much of Asia, in contrast with the depressed housing markets of the U.S. and most of Europe, property prices are surging. Much of the upward pressure is coming from speculation, however, fuelled by massive amounts of government liquidity pumped into economies as ‘stimulus’ since last year’s recession began. In Hong Kong’s case, a big part of this speculative capital is coming from mainland China. Mainlanders account for a tenth of all sales this year and one in four sales in the luxury sector. Many of these purchases – and this applies in general, not just to mainland Chinese buyers – are not for residence but just for speculation, to sell again at a higher price. Like all bubbles, this will end in tears. But it will be, and already is, ordinary workers and middle class Hong Kongers who suffer.

The government and its tycoon friends argue that any price bubble is confined to the luxury sector. But no one should be fooled by that argument. As Stephens of Market Watch points out: “For some reason Donald Tsang believes he can ring-fence price inflation to just the luxury sector of the super-rich. The logic of this looks flawed: Prices have been rising in the mass residential-property market, while anecdotal evidence shows wider prices rises across the economy.” [Market Watch, 25 October]

As developers rush to build luxury projects to meet the ‘demand’ from speculators, this reduces the supply of affordable housing (confirmed by statistics below) and drives up prices across the market as a whole. That is, until the whole market goes into a nosedive again, once the speculators take fright and begin selling their “investments”. These simple facts did not stop the property developer Ronnie Chan Chi-chung hitting out at government critics: “If there’s a bubble in the luxury property market, it will not have a huge impact on the livelihood of the general public, so what are you worried about? If those rich folks from the mainland or Hong Kong are buying luxury flats, you should just let them.” [South China Morning Post, 21 October]

On a recent radio talkshow guested by Donald Tsang, a young doctor complained that together with her lawyer boyfriend’s salary, the couple could not afford to buy a home. Tsang told the couple to be “less picky” and denied that prices had returned to their 1997 bubble level.

“Cage dwellers”

At the same time Hong Kong’s property speculators were celebrating a new world record. A so-called duplex (a two-unit apartment building) on the 43rd floor of a new luxury project was sold for HK$439 million (US$56.6m). Measured by square footage this is the most expensive apartment in the world, trumping the previous record holder near London’s Hyde Park. At the same time as speculators and the fabulously wealthy indulge themselves, at the opposite end of Hong Kong’s housing market we have the scandal of ‘cage dwellers’.

These workers, migrants, and unemployed, are too poor to rent anything other than a squalid wire cage large enough only for a mattress. According to the Society for Community Organisation (SCO), there are over 100,000 cage dwellers in Hong Kong. Rents for these inhuman contraptions have risen by 50 percent in the last three years as ‘demand’ has increased. “The rents are likely to grow as the demand for cage homes is on the increase amidst mounting job losses,” said one ‘cage’ landlord.
 

TeeKee

Alfrescian
Loyal
In Hong Kong all the land is owned by the government and then leased usually for 99 years in a system inherited from British rule (“crown property”). Instead of using this control of the territory’s limited land resources to benefit ordinary people, the government of Donald Tsang manipulates the flow of new development property onto the market to guarantee fat profits for the property tycoons. This policy has been especially evident since the 1990s property bubble burst – as in many other Asian economies – with property values declining by 50 percent after 1997. Hong Kong was hit by a second wave of property price falls in the early 2000s with the outbreak of SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) and the dotcom-led recession. But today property prices are soaring and a new bubble is expanding.

Limited land availability and private corporate control of most building development leads to an absurd, unhealthy, and environmentally unsustainable pattern of construction and development. Opulence for a privileged few prevails over genuine social need. Iconic energy-guzzling towers takes precedence over green alternatives. The ‘heat island’ effect – with pressure cooker indoor temperatures needing ever greater amounts of carbon-powered cooling – is the result of heat being trapped inside Hong Kong’s towering apartment buildings. This has been caused by wall-to-wall construction of skyscrapers, shutting out wind flows and daylight, as developers cram as many floors onto as little space as possible.

Government housing construction “on strike”

The pace of construction in the public sector has slowed dramatically under Donald Tsang even compared with his predecessor, the shipping tycoon Tung Chee Hwa. Already under Tung, in 2003, the government abandoned its HOS (House Ownership Scheme) by which it sold some houses at subsidised prices to the less well-off. The jettisoning of HOS was done under pressure from the property developers whose profits were being squeezed by the depression in property prices. This powerful cabal of billionaires with close governmental links complained of “unfair competition” from government schemes such as HOS. The result is that since five years ago (which coincidentally is when Donald Tsang took over as chief executive) the property market has become even more heavily skewed towards wasteful luxury projects for the elite, fat profits for the billionaire developers, and away from the real housing needs of society.

While around one third of Hong Kongers live in public housing, new public housing construction has slowed to half the rate it was under Tung. According to the government Housing Authority’s website, in the five years until 2005 the government built an average of 29,108 units of Public Rental Housing (PRH) each year. In the four years since then the yearly average has fallen to 14,280 units (actual PRH construction).

Total housing construction (public and private sectors) is also down to a five year low. In the first three quarters of this year, construction started on only 5,100 housing units in total.

Officially, the queue to get public housing is three years but many complain it takes far longer. There are 120,000 people on the public housing waiting list. This amounts to a criminal misallocation of Hong Kong’s resources – state-owned land and labour. Unemployment in the construction industry, at 11.8 percent, is more than double the overall rate of 5.4 percent, which itself is at a four-year high. Rather than re-launching a much needed house building programme to slash waiting lists and the lines of jobless construction workers, the government opts for a ‘drip feed’ approach that aims to keep the property market at inflated levels and line the pockets of the developers. For society as a whole this is a dangerous policy as we have seen in the U.S. and other countries. Home ownership in the U.S. was once seen as the motor of the economy, but has instead become a gigantic brake. There are 6,600 housing foreclosures every day in the U.S. as the recession bites and workers cannot repay their loans.

Housing is a basic right and should be provided by government. But in Hong Kong, although the government – i.e. society as a whole – owns the land, this is used to enrich a tiny business elite. What’s needed is an emergency housebuilding programme to build at least 80,000 new homes in the next two years, creating jobs for the unemployed and decent living conditions for ordinary people. For this to happen, the money-grabbing grip over the economy of the property tycoons and speculators must be broken, by taking the developers, construction firms, and banks, into democratic public ownership. This must be part of a comprehensive reorganisation of society in the interests of the needs of the majority and a shift to a largely carbon-free economy. This requires democratic planning of the city’s future under the control of the working class, tenants, and ordinary citizens. A socialist approach to Hong Kong’s housing crisis is the only real alternative to the misery and waste of the capitalist bubble-and-crash economy.


get_img

“Against Greedy Property Developers” – Placard on demonstration by “homeless snails” demanding that government should provide affordable housing, 25 October, Chater Garden in Hong Kong [photo: chinaworker.info]
 

Watchman

Alfrescian
Loyal
We will all stop spending on other useless things .

And because Singapore is so crowded . We hated it .

We will help spur the speed and escalation in the price of housing !
 

JinGanKor

Alfrescian
Loyal
at least they can protest unlike people here swallow down every single shit that is shoved down their throats.
 

SamuelStalin

Alfrescian
Loyal
The reason for this is the stanglehold that a cabal of property developers and speculators have over the economy and a pliant government which serves them the land – sometimes free of charge!

So does the Hong Kong government benefit from being so pliant towards these property shenanigans?
 
Top