• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Confession Of PAP Supporter

As a matter of fact I do intend to return to Singapore if I need tip top medical care.
Please start a new thread to post your date and time of arrival at Changi Airport at least one day before that momentous event happens! :p :o
 
is it a coincident that those who are highly against the PAP are very healthy and free of cancer? That is his bad karma of serving the PAP, especially being a grassroot sinkie loser and being stupid.

maybe...heavens got eyes
 
I like this whole list, quite similar to my list of sinkie behaviour. Have you thought of making different colour for alternate line rather than all red.

will consider. tks

PAP:
1. Squandered S$300m on YOG when its budget was S$100m. How did PAP get it so badly wrong?
2. Brought in millions of 3rd world unqualified, unskilled trash instead of real foreign talents
3. Increased SG suicide rate from 271 in 1995 to 467 in 2012. An increase of 70%.
4. Teenage suicide rate in SG doubled from in 2015
5. Increased GST, claiming that it was to help the poor
6. Denied that those had to collect cardboards are poor
7. Claimed that those who wiped hawker centre tables did it out of boredom

8. Claimed that there are no poor people in SG
9. Declared that every Singapore can afford healthcare in SG

10. Claimed that PA is politically neutral and serves all Singaporeans and every SG political party regardless of affiliation
11. Fumbled big time in the Sports Hub concept and operations, turning it into a white elephant
12. Mishandled the maintenance and operation of MRT and LRT lines

13. Mishandled the influx of cheap foreigners and endangering the future reliability of our lifts and integrity of our buildings
14. Sued ordinary Singaporeans who dared voice out against bad govt policies, the latest is the POHA against Dr Ting
15. Opened of two casinos

16. Online gambling ban exemption for two cronies, SG Pools and Turf Club
17. Profiteering from poor, sick, aged Singaporeans
18. Favoured foreigners, discriminated against Singaporeans
19. NS for Singaporeans, jobs for foreigners

20. Meted out lighter sentence for foreign offenders, heavier sentence for Singaporeans
21. Gave away SG citizenship to 3rd world foreigners like toilet paper
22. Accused patriotic Singaporeans of xenophobia when they objected to Filipinos wanting to celebrate their Independence Day in a public area in Downtown Orchard road
23. Resorted to amend SG's Constitution to prevent a popular Singaporean patriot from contesting the Elected Presidency
24. Displayed arrogance, lack of accountability, lack of transparency when asked to explain their mistakes

25. Accused Singaporeans of adopting a blame culture when the pap was criticised for bad mistakes
26. Used GRC as a disguise to bring in sub standard cronies
27. Started $2 company AIM to subvert Opposition Party
28. Reneged on promise to return Singaporeans CPF when they reach 55yrs old
29. Covered up structural defects of MRT trains
30. Suspicious awarded contracts to non bid tenderers

31. Turned SG into a junta
32. Arbitrarily and unilaterally manipulated the CPF Retirement Account to deny Singaporeans their hard earned savings
33. Covered up the Hep C outbreak at SGH for several months despite the loss of 8 lives
34. Used law to harass patriotic Singaporeans, eg Dr Ting
35. Used law to intimidate true blue Singaporeans eg Roy Ngerng

36. Used law to charge concerned citizens eg Han Hui hui
37. PM sued an unemployed Singapore
38. Honoured SPF Officers who fled from stone throwing foreigners
39. Condoned SPF Officers who braved themselves to handcuff Singapore children for alleged petty crime
 
Last edited:
If I did not have first hand experience of the excellence of the Singapore health system I would reserve comment.

However I have personally experienced just how good the system is when I was taking care of my aging parents and their health related issues.

Many Singaporeans in NZ who kept their sinkie citizenship invariably go back to Singapore for treatment should they come face to face with a serious illness. Although NZ healthcare is funded by the taxpayer it takes forever to get treatment because the queues are so long.

People like myself who don't trust the NZ public health system have to fork out a huge amount every month for private healthcare in order to receive prompt treatment.

Private health insurance is a booming business in NZ as a result of an inadequate public health system. I've ended up having to pay twice over because my taxes are supposed to fund my treatment should things go wrong.

When was this experience? 2015? 2016?
 
The PAP haters are blind and illogical. They simply cannot accept that Singapore is ranked highly by the rest of the world. They question the validity of the figures with no data to the contrary whatsoever.

Even WHO isn't trusted. They'll accuse the PAP of feeding false information without a shred of evidence that this is happening.

They then accuse those who appreciate the PAP of "lying". :rolleyes:

If healthcare is so bad and people are left to die then why is Singapore's life expectancy one of the highest in the world?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy

Are all the organisations that calculate the figures being fed lies? Are death certificates being falsified? If this is so then where is the proof?

I believe experiences from singaporeans who cant afford Singapore's health care. Try do some checking yourself and dont just read from published articles
 
Very few other places are as good as Singapore but you in your jealousy ryt to sabotage the good life here. You should stop this nonsense as some of the less intelligent here can start to believe what you post , since you post often enough to deceive them. I maintain that you have a sinister agenda and that you post irresponsibly.

I am enjoying my life in SG. But I feel that many singaporeans have been deprived of their lives by pap. and I have been proven right many times.

Instead of talking nonsense, why dont you prove me wrong?
 
I hear that many who were once anti PAP have seen the error of their ways as they grew older and mellowed in their views and became more realistic in their expectations. They now agree that were it not for the PAP we would be overwhelmed by our the countries around us. I daresay that you are not a Singaporean but one of those jealous neighbours who actively wish for our downfall.

why dont you just show one of them?
 
Pap is a fair weather friend

PAP doesnt believe in permanent friends. As long as that friend doesnt serve pap's interests, pap will turn away from him.

Look at how PAP behaves with regards to China. China will teach LHL a hard lesson. I heard that a Chinese Minister came to SG for an Official visit. He was speaking to SG businessmen in an official function. He taunted the SG businessmen:

"Your govt has sided with USA on the South China Seas issue. I want to hear your stand on it!"

There was dead silence after that. They knew China means business and they expect bad times ahead for SG businesses in China.

Let us see how a deteriorating USA can help LHL
 
Last edited:
why dont you just show one of them?

I am one of them. I used to hate the PAP but after broadening my mind and living in other countries I realised just how good the PAP is.
 
I am one of them. I used to hate the PAP but after broadening my mind and living in other countries I realised just how good the PAP is.

why dont you justify why you hated the pap?
 
why dont you just show one of them?

Just as you now know a Mr Lau who just became aware of the 'evils' of the PAP , I know a Mr Tan and a Ms Lim who have come to realise that but for the good that the PAP had done, they would be in a hopeless situation now in their old age.
 
why dont you just show one of them?
Last year's GE results already showed that at least 100,000 GE2011 Opposition voters flipped and voted for the PAP, which I've already explained to you only two days ago for at least the second time, so now it's at least the third time:
sammyboy.com/showthread.php?236261-Collection-of-PAP-s-Misdeeds&p=2522016#post2522016
I think it's safe to say that between GE2011 and GE2015, more Sinkies became much more knowledgeable about the PAP, and yet what was the result? :rolleyes:
Or if you think there was a miscount, does that mean the opposition parties failed in their double-checking last year? :eek:

As I've said before about two weeks ago, at least 100,000 (that's about 4% of the eligible voters) GE2011 opposition voters flipped and voted for the PAP last year:
sammyboy.com/showthread.php?235838-This-Is-Terrible-and-Horrible&p=2515882#post2515882
I have never taken part in such a useless way of rebelling/protesting, whether at Hong Lim Park or anywhere else.
And the GE2015 result is the proof:
sammyboy.com/showthread.php?216301-VALID-Opposition-votes-for-GE2011-was-803-482-but-654-289-(ex-TP-GRC)-for-GE2015

I dare say that at both GE2011 and GE2015, at least roughly 45% of the valid votes were from women, and at least another roughly 15% from male civil/public servants (including regulars in the SAF and Police), male employees of GLCs, and old men in their 60s and 70s.

And for GE2015, the remaining 10% came from new citizens, ignorant/delusional/cowardly/greedy male Sinkie first-time voters in their 20s, and finally at least 100,000 (at least 4% of the eligible voters) male voters who voted for some opposition party at GE2011 but flipped and voted for the PAP at GE2015. :*:
 
Just as you now know a Mr Lau who just became aware of the 'evils' of the PAP , I know a Mr Tan and a Ms Lim who have come to realise that but for the good that the PAP had done, they would be in a hopeless situation now in their old age.

That's good.

Can elaborate more on how Mr Tan was for the Opposition and what made him turn to pap now?

Can you tell us more abt Ms Lim? Which party she supported and why she is thankful to the pap now?
 
3. Increased SG suicide rate from 271 in 1995 to 467 in 2012. An increase of 70%.
sammyboy.com/showthread.php?236261-Collection-of-PAP-s-Misdeeds&p=2522912#post2522912
Couple of points:

1. That is not a suicide rate, but the total number of suicides (possibly also including foreigners). ;)
According to the "Samaritans of Singapore":
sos.org.sg/images/facts-figures/Nationalstats.pdf
the total number of suicides in 1995 was 401, not 271.
Therefore, the increase was only about 16%, even though the total population (including foreigners) increased by over 40%. ;)

2. Even if all 467 suicides in 2012 were committed by Sinkie citizens; the citizen population was slightly over 3 million, let's say 3.2 million; so the suicide rate was actually 467 / 3.2 million x 100,000 = about 15 suicides per 100,000 citizens in 2012.
Which means that the suicide rate in 2012 was at most only slightly higher than, or even nearly the same as, the rate in 1995. ;)
 
Last edited:
why dont you justify why you hated the pap?

There's nothing to justify. When I lived in Singapore I had the impression that the PAP was oppressive and their policies were poor but that is because I had no basis of comparison.

After spending time abroad I came to realise why certain policies are necessary and how efficient the government is.
 
That's good.

Can elaborate more on how Mr Tan was for the Opposition and what made him turn to pap now?

Can you tell us more abt Ms Lim? Which party she supported and why she is thankful to the pap now?

So finally you see the light and admit that it is a good thing that people come to their senses and turn to the PAP. You have hope yet.
 
There's nothing to justify. When I lived in Singapore I had the impression that the PAP was oppressive and their policies were poor but that is because I had no basis of comparison.

After spending time abroad I came to realise why certain policies are necessary and how efficient the government is.

why did you think the pap was oppressive?
 
There's nothing to justify. When I lived in Singapore I had the impression that the PAP was oppressive and their policies were poor but that is because I had no basis of comparison.

After spending time abroad I came to realise why certain policies are necessary and how efficient the government is.

what were the policies you considered poor?
 
Back
Top