• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious More Letheal STROMS Hurricanes Cyclones Tyhpoons due to Global Warming

matamafia

Alfrescian
Loyal
Storms etc collects moisture (vapor clouds rain) via heating up water from essentially oceans for the Giant Storms. More heat makes more moisture more heavy huge thick clouds, more high speed wind spinning with higher energy level, hence more lethal storms. When they hit, not only at more weight (of water) momentum, speed, more rainfall and flooding, more damages and deaths and hurt more people. Water and air are only medium to carry these energy from Sun in terms of heat. Essentially the energy will bring tremendous quantity of water from oceans, and throw it on our cities and farms and factories and roads and our shipping routes - more violently. Man fucked with planet earth, it will kill man in return.


https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/ClimateStorms/page2.php



NASA
Earth Observatory

Home
Images
Global Maps
Features
News & Notes

Storms are Getting Stronger

What exactly does it mean for storms to get “stronger”? Does it mean faster winds? A larger wind field? Lower pressure at the center? More rain and snowfall? Higher storm surges?

“You have to remember that storms aren’t one-dimensional,” says Del Genio. “There are many types of storms, and sorting out how aspects of each type respond to warming is where the science really gets interesting.”
sandy_sst_2012302
As Sandy was moving up the U.S. East Coast, unusually warm ocean temperatures allowed the storm to stay strong after it left tropical waters. (Map by Robert Simmon, using data from the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory.)

Rising sea levels exacerbated Sandy’s storm surge, for example, a direct link between global warming and storm damage. And abnormally high sea surface temperatures in the Atlantic probably intensified the storm. But pinning all of Sandy’s fury—its hybrid nature, the scale of its winds, its unusual track—on global warming is premature, says Shepherd, the current president of the American Meteorological Society.

Weather forecasters use terms like snowstorms, derechos, hailstorms, rainstorms, blizzards, low-pressure systems, lightning storms, hurricanes, typhoons, nor‘easters, and twisters. Research meteorologists and climatologists have a simpler way of dividing up the world’s storms: thunderstorms, tropical cyclones, and extra-tropical cyclones. All are atmospheric disturbances that redistribute heat and produce some combination of clouds, precipitation, and wind.
Satellite image of the 3 fundamental types of storms.

Tropical cyclones, extra-tropical cyclones, and thunderstorms are the three fundamental types of storms studied by the climate change community. (Image ©2013 EUMETSAT.)

Thunderstorms are the smallest type, and they are often part of the larger storm systems (tropical and extra-tropical cyclones). All storms require moisture, energy, and certain wind conditions to develop, but the combination of ingredients varies depending on the type of storm and local meteorological conditions.

For example, thunderstorms form when a trigger—a cold front, converging near-surface winds, or rugged topography—destabilizes a mass of warm, humid air and causes it to rise. The air expands and cools as it ascends, increasing the humidity until the water vapor condenses into liquid droplets or ice crystals in precipitation-making clouds. The process of converting water vapor into liquid water or ice releases latent heat into the atmosphere. (If this doesn’t make sense, remember that the reverse—turning liquid water into water vapor by boiling it—requires heat).

Storms feed off of latent heat, which is why scientists think global warming is strengthening storms. Extra heat in the atmosphere or ocean nourishes storms; the more heat energy that goes in, the more vigorously a weather system can churn.
Diagram showing convection within a thunderstorm as it forms.

Thunderstorms derive their energy from the heat released by the condensation of water vapor. This “latent heat” energy drives thunderstorm clouds high into the atmosphere. Thunderstorms dissipate when the cold downdraft created by falling rain drops stifles rising warm air. (Image adapted from NOAA National Weather Service Life Cycle of a Thunderstorm.)

Already, there is evidence that the winds of some storms may be changing. A study based on more than two decades of satellite altimeter data (measuring sea surface height) showed that hurricanes intensify significantly faster now than they did 25 years ago. Specifically, researchers found that storms attain Category 3 wind speeds nearly nine hours faster than they did in the 1980s. Another satellite-based study found that global wind speeds had increased by an average of 5 percent over the past two decades.

There is also evidence that extra water vapor in the atmosphere is making storms wetter. During the past 25 years, satellites have measured a 4 percent rise in water vapor in the air column. In ground-based records, about 76 percent of weather stations in the United States have seen increases in extreme precipitation since 1948. One analysis found that extreme downpours are happening 30 percent more often. Another study found that the largest storms now produce 10 percent more precipitation.
Graph showing the global increase in humidity since 1970.

Increases in global temperature have raised atmospheric humidity. (Graph by Robert Simmon, based on data from the NOAA National Climatic Data Center.)

William Lau, a scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, concluded in a 2012 paper that rainfall totals from tropical cyclones in the North Atlantic have risen at a rate of 24 percent per decade since 1988. The increase in precipitation doesn’t just apply to rain. NOAA scientists have examined 120 years of data and found that there were twice as many extreme regional snowstorms between 1961 and 2010 as there were from 1900 to 1960.

But measuring a storm’s maximum size, heaviest rains, or top winds does not capture the full scope of its power. Kerry Emanuel, a hurricane expert at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, developed a method to measure the total energy expended by tropical cyclones over their lifetimes. In 2005, he showed that Atlantic hurricanes are about 60 percent more powerful than they were in the 1970s. Storms lasted longer and their top wind speeds had increased by 25 percent. (Subsequent research has shown that the intensification may be related to differences between the temperature of the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.)


thunderstorm_convection_diagram.jpg




https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming-and-hurricanes/


Global Warming and Hurricanes
An Overview of Current Research Results

Last Revised: March 17, 2017
Contents

Summary Statement
Global Warming and Atlantic Hurricanes
Global Tropical Cyclone Activity and Climate Warming
Recent Relevant GFDL Papers and Animations
WMO Expert Team 2010 Assessment of Tropical Cyclones and Climate Change
Early GFDL Research on Global Warming and Hurricanes
Related links

1. Summary Statement

Two frequently asked questions on global warming and hurricanes are the following:

Have humans already caused a detectable increase in Atlantic hurricane activity or global tropical cyclone activity?
What changes in hurricane activity are expected for the late 21st century, given the pronounced global warming scenarios from current IPCC models?

In this review, we address these questions in the context of published research findings. We will first present the main conclusions and then follow with some background discussion of the research that leads to these conclusions. The main conclusions are:
Likelihood Statements

The terminology here for likelihood statements generally follows the conventions used in the IPCC AR4, i.e., for the assessed likelihood of an outcome or result:

Very Likely: > 90%,
Likely: > 66%
More Likely Than Not (or Better Than Even Odds) > 50%

It is premature to conclude that human activities–and particularly greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming–have already had a detectable impact on Atlantic hurricane or global tropical cyclone activity. That said, human activities may have already caused changes that are not yet detectable due to the small magnitude of the changes or observational limitations, or are not yet confidently modeled (e.g., aerosol effects on regional climate).
Anthropogenic warming by the end of the 21st century will likely cause tropical cyclones globally to be more intense on average (by 2 to 11% according to model projections for an IPCC A1B scenario). This change would imply an even larger percentage increase in the destructive potential per storm, assuming no reduction in storm size.
There are better than even odds that anthropogenic warming over the next century will lead to an increase in the occurrence of very intense tropical cyclone in some basins–an increase that would be substantially larger in percentage terms than the 2-11% increase in the average storm intensity. This increase in intense storm occurrence is projected despite a likely decrease (or little change) in the global numbers of all tropical cyclones.
Anthropogenic warming by the end of the 21st century will likely cause tropical cyclones to have substantially higher rainfall rates than present-day ones, with a model-projected increase of about 10-15% for rainfall rates averaged within about 100 km of the storm center.

2. Global Warming and Atlantic Hurricanes
A. Statistical relationships between SSTs and hurricanes

Observed records of Atlantic hurricane activity show some correlation, on multi-year time-scales, between local tropical Atlantic sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and the Power Dissipation Index (PDI) —see for example Fig. 3 on this EPA Climate Indicators site. PDI is an aggregate measure of Atlantic hurricane activity, combining frequency, intensity, and duration of hurricanes in a single index. Both Atlantic SSTs and PDI have risen sharply since the 1970s, and there is some evidence that PDI levels in recent years are higher than in the previous active Atlantic hurricane era in the 1950s and 60s.

Model-based climate change detection/attribution studies have linked increasing tropical Atlantic SSTs to increasing greenhouse gases, but the link between increasing greenhouse gases and hurricane PDI or frequency has been based on statistical correlations. The statistical linkage of Atlantic hurricane PDI to and Atlantic SST suggests at least the possibility of a large anthropogenic influence on Atlantic hurricanes. If the correlation between tropical Atlantic SSTs and hurricane activity is used to infer future changes in Atlantic hurricane activity, the implications are sobering: the large increases in tropical Atlantic SSTs projected for the late 21st century would imply very substantial increases in hurricane destructive potential–roughly a 300% increase in the PDI by 2100 (Figure 1a).
Figure 1 (click to enlarge)

On the other hand, Swanson (2008) and others have noted that Atlantic hurricane power dissipation is also well-correlated with other SST indices besides tropical Atlantic SST alone, and in particular with indices of Atlantic SST relative to tropical mean SST (e.g., Figure 1b from Vecchi et al. 2008). This is in fact a crucial distinction, because the statistical relationship between Atlantic hurricanes and local Atlantic SST shown in the upper panel of Figure 1 would imply a very large increases in Atlantic hurricane activity (PDI) due to 21st century greenhouse warming, while the statistical relationship between the PDI and the alternative relative SST measure shown in the lower panel of Figure 1 would imply only modest changes of Atlantic hurricane activity (PDI) with greenhouse warming. In the latter case, the alternative relative SST measure in the lower panel does not change very much over the 21st century in global warming projections from climate models, because the warming projected for the tropical Atlantic in the models is not very different from that projected for the tropics as a whole.

A key question then is: Which of the two future Atlantic hurricane scenarios inferred from the statistical relations in Figure 1 is more likely? To try to gain insight on this question, we have first attempted to go beyond the ~50 year historical record of Atlantic hurricanes and SST to examine even longer records of Atlantic tropical storm activity and second to examine dynamical models of Atlantic hurricane activity under global warming conditions. These separate approaches are discussed below.
B. Analysis of century-scale Atlantic tropical storm and hurricane records
Figure 2 (click to enlarge)

To gain more insight on this problem, we have attempted to analyze much longer (> 100 yr) records of Atlantic hurricane activity. If greenhouse warming causes a substantial increase in Atlantic hurricane activity, then the century scale increase in tropical Atlantic SSTs since the late 1800s should have produced a long-term rise in measures of Atlantic hurricanes activity.

Existing records of past Atlantic tropical storm or hurricane numbers (1878 to present) in fact do show a pronounced upward trend, which is also correlated with rising SSTs (e.g., see blue curve in Fig. 4 or Vecchi and Knutson 2008). However, the density of reporting ship traffic over the Atlantic was relatively sparse during the early decades of this record, such that if storms from the modern era (post 1965) had hypothetically occurred during those earlier decades, a substantial number would likely not have been directly observed by the ship-based “observing network of opportunity.” We find that, after adjusting for such an estimated number of missing storms, there is a small nominally positive upward trend in tropical storm occurrence from 1878-2006. But statistical tests reveal that this trend is so small, relative to the variability in the series, that it is not significantly distinguishable from zero (Figure 2). In addition, Landsea et al. (2010) note that the rising trend in Atlantic tropical storm counts is almost entirely due to increases in short-duration (<2 day) storms alone. Such short-lived storms were particularly likely to have been overlooked in the earlier parts of the record, as they would have had less opportunity for chance encounters with ship traffic.
Figure 3 (click to enlarge)
Figure 4 (click to enlarge)

If we instead consider Atlantic basin hurricanes, rather than all Atlantic tropical storms, the result is similar: the reported numbers of hurricanes were sufficiently high during the 1860s-1880s that again there is no significant positive trend in numbers beginning from that era (Figure 3, black curve, from CCSP 3.3 (2008)). This is without any adjustment for “missing hurricanes”.

The evidence for an upward trend is even weaker if we look at U.S. landfalling hurricanes, which even show a slight negative trend beginning from 1900 or from the late 1800s (Figure 3, blue curve). Hurricane landfalling frequency is much less common than basin-wide occurrence, meaning that the U.S. landfalling hurricane record, while more reliable than the basin-wide record, suffers from degraded signal-to-noise characteristics for assessing trends.

While major hurricanes (Figure 3, red curve) show more evidence of a rising trend from the late 1800s, the major hurricane data are considered even less reliable than the other two records in the early parts of the record. Category 4-5 hurricanes show a pronounced increase since the mid-1940s (Bender et al., 2010) but again, we consider that these data need to be carefully assessed for data inhomogeneity problems before such trends can be accepted as reliable.

The situation for Atlantic hurricane long-term records is summarized in Figure 4. While global mean temperature and tropical Atlantic SSTs show pronounced and statistically significant warming trends (green curves), the U.S. landfalling hurricane record (orange curve) shows no significant increase or decrease. The unadjusted hurricane count record (blue curve) shows a significant increase in Atlantic hurricanes since the early 1900s. However, when adjusted with an estimate of storms that stayed at sea and were likely “missed” in the pre-satellite era, there is no significant increase in Atlantic hurricanes since the late 1800s (red curve). While there have been increases in U.S. landfalling hurricanes and basin-wide hurricane counts since the since the early 1970s, Figure 4 shows that these increases are not representative of the behavior seen in the century long records. In short, the historical Atlantic hurricane record does not provide compelling evidence for a substantial greenhouse warming-induced long-term increase.
C. Model simulations of greenhouse warming influence on Atlantic hurricanes

Direct model simulations of hurricane activity under climate change scenarios offer another perspective on the problem. We have developed a regional dynamical downscaling model for Atlantic hurricanes and tested it by comparing with observed hurricane activity since 1980. This model, when forced with observed sea surface temperatures and atmospheric conditions, can reproduce the observed rise in hurricane counts between 1980 and 2012, along with much of the interannual variability (Figure 5). Animations showing the development and evolution of hurricane activity in the model are available here.
Figure 5 (click to enlarge)

Turning to future climate projections, current climate models suggest that tropical Atlantic SSTs will warm dramatically during the 21st century, and that upper tropospheric temperatures will warm even more than SSTs. Furthermore, most of the models project increasing levels of vertical wind shear over parts of the western tropical Atlantic (see Vecchi and Soden 2007). Both the increased warming of the upper troposphere relative to the surface and the increased vertical wind shear are detrimental factors for hurricane development and intensification, while warmer SSTs favor development and intensitification. To explore which effect of these effects might “win out”, we can run experiments with our regional downscaling model.

Our regional model projects that Atlantic hurricane and tropical storms are substantially reduced in number, for the average 21st century climate change projected by current models, but have higher rainfall rates, particularly near the storm center. The average intensity of the storms that do occur increases by a few percent (Figure 6), in general agreement with previous studies using other relatively high resolution models, as well as with hurricane potential intensity theory (Emanuel 1987).
Figure 6 (click to enlarge)

Earlier, Knutson and Tuleya (2004) estimated the rough order of magnitude of the hurricane sensitivity to be about 4% per deg C SST warming for maximum intensities and about 12% per deg C for near-storm (100 km radius) rainfall rates (see also Knutson and Tuleya (2008) abstract here). These sensitivity estimates have considerable uncertainty, as CCSP 3.3 (2008) , gives an estimated range of 1-8% per deg C SST warming for hurricane intensity, and 6-18% per deg C for near-storm rainfall rates.

A review of existing studies, including the ones cited above, lead us to conclude that it is likely that greenhouse warming will cause hurricanes in the coming century to be more intense globally and have higher rainfall rates than present-day hurricanes.

Turning now to the important question of the frequency of very intense hurricanes, the regional model of Knutson et al. (2008) has an important limitation in that it does not simulate such very intense hurricanes. For example, the maximum surface wind in the simulated hurricanes from that model is less than 50 m/s (which is borderline category 3 hurricane intensity). Furthermore, the idealized study of Knutson and Tuleya (2004) assumed the existence of hurricanes and then simulated how intense they would become. Thus, that study could not address the important question of the frequency of intense hurricanes.

In our latest Atlantic basin dynamical downscaling studies (Bender et al. 2010; Knutson et al. 2013), we have tried to address both of these limitations by letting the Atlantic basin regional model of Knutson et al. (2008) provide the overall storm frequency information, and then downscaling each individual storm from the regional model study into the GFDL hurricane prediction system. The GFDL hurricane model (with a grid spacing as fine as 9 km) is able to simulate the frequency, intensity, and structure of the more intense hurricanes, such as category 3-5 storms, much more realistically than the regional (18 km grid) model.

Using this additional downscaling step, the GFDL hurricane model reproduces some important historical characteristics of very intense Atlantic hurricanes, including the wind speed distribution and the change of this distribution between active and inactive decadal periods of hurricane activity (Fig. 1 of Bender et al. 2010). The model also supports the notion of a substantial decrease (~25%) in the overall number of Atlantic hurricanes and tropical storms with projected 21st century climate warming. However, using the CMIP3 and CMIP5 multi-model climate projections, the hurricane model also projects that the lifetime maximum intensity of Atlantic hurricanes will increase by about 5% during the 21st century in general agreement with previous studies. The hurricane model further projects a significant increase (+90%) in the frequency of very intense (category 4 and 5) hurricanes using the CMIP3/A1B 18-model average climate change projection (Fig. 7). Downscaled projections using CMIP5 multi-model scenarios (RCP4.5) as input (Knutson et al. 2013) still show increases in category 4 and 5 storm frequency, but these are only marginally significant for the early 21st century (+45%) or the late 21st century (+40%) CMIP5 scenarios. Downscaling individual CMIP3 model projections instead of the multi-model ensemble, we find that three of ten models produced a significant increase in category 4 and 5 storms, while the other seven produced no significant change. While multi-model ensemble results are probably more reliable than individual model results, each of the individual model results can be viewed as at least plausible at this time.
Figure 7 (click to enlarge)

Returning to the issue of future projections of aggregate activity (PDI, as in Fig. 1), while there remains a lack of consensus among various studies on how Atlantic hurricane PDI will change, no model we have analyzed shows a sensitivity of Atlantic hurricane PDI to greenhouse warming as large as that implied by the observed Atlantic PDI/local SST relationship shown in Figures 1 (top panel). In other words, there is little evidence from current dynamical models that 21st century climate warming will lead to large (~300%) increases in tropical storm numbers, hurricane numbers, or PDI in the Atlantic. As noted above, there is some indication from high resolution models of substantial increases in the numbers of the most intense hurricanes even if the overall number of tropical storms or hurricanes decreases. In the Bender et al. 2010 study, we estimate that the effect of increasing category 4-5 storms outweighs the reduction in overall hurricane numbers such that we project (very roughly) a 30% increase in potential damage in the Atlantic basin by 2100. This estimate does not include the influence of future sea level rise or other important factors such as coastal development or changes in building practices.

Finally, one can ask whether the change in Category 4-5 hurricanes projected by our model is already detectable in the Atlantic hurricane records. Owing to the large interannual to decadal variability of SST and hurricane activity in the basin, Bender et al (2010) estimate that detection of this projected anthropogenic influence on hurricanes should not be expected for a number of decades. While there is a large rising trend since the mid 1940’s in category 4-5 numbers in the Atlantic, our view is that these data are not reliable for trend calculations, until they have been further assessed for data homogeneity problems, such as those due to changing observing practices.
D. Other possible human influences on Atlantic hurricane climate

Apart from greenhouse warming, other human influences conceivably could have contributed to recent observed increases in Atlantic hurricanes. For example, Mann and Emanuel (2006) hypothesize that a reduction in aerosol-induced cooling over the Atlantic in recent decades may have contributed to the enhanced warming of the tropical North Atlantic, relative to global mean temperature. However, the cause or causes of the recent enhanced warming of the Atlantic, relative to other tropical basins, and its effect on Atlantic tropical cyclones, remains highly uncertain (e.g., Booth et al. 2012; Zhang et al. 2013;Dunstone et al. 2013; Villarini and Vecchi 2013). A number of anthropogenic and natural factors (e.g., aerosols, greenhouse gases, volcanic activity, solar variability, and internal climate variability) must be considered as potential contributors, and the science remains highly uncertain in these areas. Finally recent work (Kossin et al. 2014; see GFDL Research Highlight) indicates that the latitude at which the maximum intensity of tropical cyclones occurs has expanded poleward globally in recent decades, although the causes for this have not been firmly established and a significant change was not seen in the Atlantic basin statistics.

Sea level rise must also be considered as a way in which human-caused climate change can impact Atlantic hurricane climate–or at least the impacts of the hurricanes at the coast. The vulnerability of coastal regions to storm-surge flooding is expected to increase with future sea-level rise and coastal development, although this vulnerability will also depend upon future storm characteristics, as discussed above. There are large ranges in the 21st Century projections for both Atlantic hurricane characteristics and for the magnitude of regional sea level rise along the U.S. coastlines. However, according to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the average rate of global sea level rise over the 21st Century will very likely exceed that observed during 1971-2010 for a range of future emission scenarios.
E. Summary for Atlantic Hurricanes and Global Warming

In summary, neither our model projections for the 21st century nor our analyses of trends in Atlantic hurricane and tropical storm counts over the past 120+ yr support the notion that greenhouse gas-induced warming leads to large increases in either tropical storm or overall hurricane numbers in the Atlantic. One modeling study projects a large (~100%) increase in Atlantic category 4-5 hurricanes over the 21st century, but we estimate that this increase may not be detectable until the latter half of the century.

Therefore, we conclude that despite statistical correlations between SST and Atlantic hurricane activity in recent decades, it is premature to conclude that human activity–and particularly greenhouse warming–has already caused a detectable change in Atlantic hurricane activity. (“Detectable” here means the change is large enough to be distinguishable from the variability due to natural causes.) However, human activity may have already caused some some changes that are not yet detectable due to the small magnitude of the changes or observation limitations, or are not yet confidently modeled (e.g., aerosol effects on regional climate).

We also conclude that it is likely that climate warming will cause hurricanes in the coming century to be more intense globally and to have higher rainfall rates than present-day hurricanes. In our view, there are better than even odds that the numbers of very intense (category 4 and 5) hurricanes will increase by a substantial fraction in some basins, while it is likely that the annual number of tropical storms globally will either decrease or remain essentially unchanged. These assessment statements are intended to apply to climate warming of the type projected for the 21st century by IPCC AR4 scenarios, such as A1B.

The relatively conservative confidence levels attached to these projections, and the lack of a claim of detectable anthropogenic influence at this time contrasts with the situation for other climate metrics, such as global mean temperature. In the case of global mean surface temperature, the IPCC 5th Assessment Report (2013) presents a strong body of scientific evidence that most of the global warming observed over the past half century is very likely due to human-caused greenhouse gas emissions.
3. Global Tropical Cyclone Activity and Climate Warming
Figure 8 (click to enlarge)

The main focus of this web page is on Atlantic hurricane activity and global warming. However, an important question concerns whether global warming has or will substantially affect tropical cyclone activity in other basins.

In terms of historical tropical cyclone activity, a 2010 WMO assessment of tropical cyclones and climate change concluded that “it remains uncertain whether past changes in tropical cyclone activity have exceeded the variability expected from natural causes.” This conclusion applied to all basins around the globe.

For future projections, GFDL atmospheric modelers have developed global models capable of simulating many aspects of the seasonal and year-to-year variability of tropical cyclone frequency in a number of basins, using only historical sea surface temperatures as input. Examples of the performance of this model on historical data are provided on this web page.

Our latest study examines the impact of 21st-century projected climate changes (CMIP5, RCP4.5 scenario) on a number of tropical cyclone metrics, using the GFDL hurricane model to downscale storms from a lower resolution global atmospheric model. Key findings from these experiments include: fewer tropical cyclones globally in a warmer late-twenty-first-century climate (Figure 8), but also an increase in average cyclone intensity, the number and occurrence days of very intense category 4 and 5 storms in most basins (Figure 9) and in tropical cyclone precipitation rates (Figure 10). These global changes are similar to the consensus findings from a review of earlier studies in the 2010 WMO assessment. These changes do not necessarily occur in all basins. For example, there is a projected increase in tropical storm frequency in the Northeast Pacific and near Hawaii, and a projected decreases in category 4-5 storm days over much of the southern hemisphere basins and parts of the northwest Pacific basin. These differences in responses between basins seem to be linked to how much SSTs increase in a given region compared to the tropical mean increase in SST. Basins that warm more than the tropical average tend to show larger increases in tropical cyclone activity for a number of metrics. Our simulations show little projected change in the median size of tropical cyclone projected globally; the model framework does show some skill at simulating the differences in average storm size between various basins in the present-day climate.

Figure 9 (click to enlarge)
Figure 10 (click to enlarge)
4. Recent Relevant GFDL Papers and Animations

Global Projections of Intense Tropical Cyclone Activity for the Late Twenty-First Century from Dynamical Downscaling of CMIP5/RCP4.5 Scenarios (J. Climate, Sept. 2015).
The poleward migration of the location of tropical cyclone maximum intensity, (Kossin, Emanuel, and Vecchi; Nature 2014). (see GFDL Research Highlight)
Dynamical Downscaling Projections of Twenty-First-Century Atlantic Hurricane Activity: CMIP3 and CMIP5 Model-Based Scenarios, J. Climate 2013.
TC-permitting GCM simulations of hurricane frequency response to sea surface temperature anomalies projected for the late 21st century. J. Climate 2012.
Modeled Impact of Anthropogenic Warming on the Frequency of Intense Atlantic Hurricanes. Science 2010
FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) on our recent Science paper (updated Jan. 25, 2010)
How well do we know past Atlantic hurricane activity? A web site on adjusting for “missing storms” in the past Atlantic hurricane data.
Simulations of global hurricane climatology, interannual variability, and response to global warming using a 50km resolution GCM. J. Climate, 2009.
Simulated reduction in Atlantic hurricane frequency under twenty-first-century warming conditions, Nature Geoscience, doi:10.1038/ngeo202(Published online May 2008)
FAQ (Frequency Asked Questions) on our recent Nature Geoscience study (Posted June 11, 2008)
On Estimates of Historical North Atlantic Tropical Cyclone Activity — J. Climate (July 15, 2008 issue)
Simulation of the recent multidecadal increase of Atlantic hurricane activity — BAMS (October 2007 issue)
Simulated Hurricane Animations Web Page

5. WMO Expert Team 2010 Assessment of Tropical Cyclones and Climate Change

“Tropical Cyclones and Climate Change“, an assessment by a World Meteorological Organization Expert Team on Climate Change Impacts on Tropical Cyclones is now available. This assessment was published in Nature Geoscience (March 2010). For more information on the expert team, see this WMO web page.

This report assesses published research on “Tropical Cyclones and Climate Change” from the international scientific literature.
6. Early GFDL Research on Global Warming and Hurricanes
Figure 11 (click to enlarge)

The strongest hurricanes in the present climate may be upstaged by even more intense hurricanes
 

matamafia

Alfrescian
Loyal
gettyimages-835977482-60-a225358323cb21628e9a1689420ac3d463ca6f27-s1100-c15.jpg



http://www.npr.org/sections/goatsan...-just-in-texas-are-a-challenge-for-aid-groups



Epic Floods — Not Just In Texas — Are A Challenge For Aid Groups

Facebook
Twitter
Google+
Email

August 29, 20173:42 PM ET
Malaka Gharib 2016 square

Malaka Gharib
Twitter

A boy on the outskirts of Bogra, Bangladesh, on Aug. 20.
Turjoy Chowdhury/NurPhoto via Getty Images

With a reported 50 inches of rainfall, flash flooding and high, murky waters, Hurricane Harvey in Houston has gripped America's attention. But halfway around the world, another flood has wreaked havoc on historic levels. Two weeks ago, record monsoon rains hit parts of Bangladesh, India and Nepal, bringing the worst floods the region has seen in years. Over 1,200 people have been killed and 24 million affected.

Relief agencies like the Red Cross, Islamic Relief and Save the Children are on the ground in both areas, juggling resources to address the crises. On its face, the humanitarian needs are the same, explains Jono Anzalone, vice president of international services at the American Red Cross, who just returned from Bangladesh, where he witnessed flood relief efforts. But for workers and volunteers in South Asia and the U.S., the conditions to deliver aid couldn't be any more different.

NPR interviewed Anzalone, Minhaj Hassan of Islamic Relief and Laura Cardinal, senior director of humanitarian response at Save the Children about the situation in both disaster areas. The interviews have been edited for length and clarity.

Editor's note: In investigative stories by NPR, the Red Cross was criticized for "poorly managed projects, questionable spending and dubious claims of success" after the earthquake in Haiti and Superstorm Sandy. The Red Cross has defended its record. Addressing concerns about the Red Cross role in the wake of Hurricane Harvey, a spokesperson told NPR: "We respect donor intent and assure Americans that all donations raised for Hurricane Harvey relief efforts will enable the Red Cross to prepare for, respond to and help people recover from this specific disaster."

A flooded street during heavy rain in Mumbai, India, on Tuesday.
Imtiyaz Shaikh/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

Interview Highlights

Is having two flood disasters putting a strain on relief efforts?

Anzalone: What is challenging is that this is just another disaster on top of four famines in Africa and the Middle East, a cholera crisis in Yemen, protracted emergencies in Syria, Afghanistan. Donor fatigue is a significant concern. When you have this many simultaneous disasters, it's hard to draw attention to any particular one.

What do the floods in Houston and South Asia have in common?

Cardinal: Whether it's here at home or across the ocean, children and families have been stranded in their homes. Many have lost everything. Education has been disrupted. Businesses have been closed, destroyed. It will take a long time for people to restart their lives. In Nepal, for example, 80 percent of the fields were destroyed, which has a huge impact on the agricultural sector and food security.

Are the needs similar?

Cardinal: Children and adults need safe places and access to food and water. Children need psychosocial support. We need to get children back in school as quickly as possible. In both places, the situation is still in the first phase: We are delivering life-saving support right in the middle of the emergency. In Nepal, the waters have started to recede, but there's another forecast of rain.

And what's different?

Anzalone: Infrastructure. If you compare the shelter conditions in Bangladesh to Texas, as dire as the condition may seem in Texas, typically, we would at least have safe structures on safe ground — not in flood plains.

What about health needs?

Anzalone: In Bangladesh, India and Nepal every single year, things like bed nets [to keep away mosquitoes that can spread malaria and dengue], oral rehydration salts [to prevent diarrheal disease and cholera] can save a person's life. Those are priority items to distribute when a disaster like this strikes.

In the U.S., it's uncommon to see the distribution of mosquito nets and rehydration salts. Even though in Texas we do have mosquitoes, we're very fortunate that the shelters have well-contained vector control [methods to shut out mosquitoes and other disease-carrying animals].

What about recovery efforts? How will those differ?

Anzalone: For better or for worse, when people look at the U.S. response system, we have a very mature federal disaster response system, starting with FEMA [the Federal Emergency Management Agency]. It's a machine. Immediately before landfall of Hurricane Harvey, the governor of Texas requested aid for long-term recovery projects.

You don't see that in Nepal, Bangladesh or India. In Nepal and Bangladesh, the government simply doesn't have the resources. There is no tax base to support that robust response and recovery system. Their process to rebuild is complicated by underlying development issues that are inherent in those countries.

What lessons could both disasters learn from each other?

Cardinal: Preparedness is key. Nepal, Bangladesh and India are no strangers to emergency. They've done a lot over the last decade: making sure people evacuate and know where to seek shelter, making sure governments are ready to support the population. We've seen that in both [Texas and South Asia].
Want To Help Hurricane Harvey Victims? Experts Say Donate Cash
Around the Nation
Want To Help Hurricane Harvey Victims? Experts Say Donate Cash

Anzalone: And no one agency can do it alone. Aid groups work together to see where they can help.

How do aid groups divvy up the work in times of crisis?

Hassan: In the case of Hurricane Harvey, we are working with the American Red Cross. Everyone knows their responsibilities, so stepping on each other's toes is not a problem. Right now, our volunteers are assisting in emergency shelters in Dallas, providing support and counseling to the evacuees.

In Bangladesh and India, we're more independent. We've had an office in Bangladesh a long time, we have roots there.

What do people need right now in both places?

Hassan: Right now, cash is king. Material goods aren't as effective as cold, hard cash. We've been stressing all along: whoever wants to donate, please give cash.

In Bangladesh, we're giving cash cards with about $50 a person to help [flood evacuees] get back on their feet and provide themselves with the essential goods. In Bangladesh, that amount can go a pretty long way.

Is one disaster more urgent than the other?

Anzalone: No one life is greater than the other.
 

matamafia

Alfrescian
Loyal
[video=youtube_share;pogDZ75CBDk]https://youtu.be/pogDZ75CBDk[/video]


[video=youtube_share;rujjERm5iH0]https://youtu.be/rujjERm5iH0[/video]
 

matamafia

Alfrescian
Loyal
[video=youtube_share;klVE0a3REkU]https://youtu.be/klVE0a3REkU[/video]

[video=youtube_share;VfQZgUvWuc0]https://youtu.be/VfQZgUvWuc0[/video]
 

matamafia

Alfrescian
Loyal
[video=youtube_share;RQOf-zvf25o]https://youtu.be/RQOf-zvf25o[/video]

[video=youtube_share;F2a_0UvZetY]https://youtu.be/F2a_0UvZetY[/video]
 

matamafia

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...urricane-harvey-editorials-debates/105130334/


Climate change juiced Hurricane Harvey
The Editorial Board, USA TODAY Published 6:47 p.m. ET Aug. 30, 2017 | Updated 7:20 p.m. ET Aug. 30, 2017
This isn’t just happening here. A thousand died from monsoons half a world away: Our view
editorial083017

(Photo: Henrietta Wildsmith, The Shreveport (La.) Times, USA TODAY Network)
1 CONNECTTWEETLINKEDIN 1 COMMENTEMAILMORE

Even as floodwaters raged this week in Texas and Louisiana, so did the debate over the possible link between Hurricane Harvey and man-made climate change.

Climate activists pointed to the historic rainfall and epic flooding as exactly the type of extreme event forecast to occur as the globe warms. Skeptics cited a long list of tropical storms that slammed Texas even before the buildup of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

So who’s right?

In some ways, the question is premature, even unseemly, while search and rescue efforts continue. And a definitive answer won’t come until scientists conduct post-storm “attribution” studies. In all likelihood, though, the conclusion will be that climate change didn’t cause Harvey, but it almost surely made the storm worse.

OUR VIEW:Hurricane Harvey images show America at its best

Harvey produced 40- to 50-inch rainfall totals that left parts of Houston looking like Venice and rivaled snowfall accumulations from blizzards in the Northeast. It was, in fact, the most extreme rainfall event on the continental United States in recorded history.

Such events are consistent with the basic science of climate change: Warmer than normal water temperatures, in places such as the Gulf of Mexico, provide heat energy that fuels the formation and rapid strengthening of tropical storms. Warmer air holds more water vapor, which in turn produces more rainfall. And rising sea levels exacerbate storm surge and inland flooding.

According to the National Climate Assessment, “Heavy downpours are increasing nationally (in recent decades), with the largest increases in the Midwest and Northeast. Increases in extreme precipitation are projected for all U.S. regions.”

This isn’t just happening in North America.

Even as Harvey riveted the nation’s attention this week, the death toll topped 1,000 from unusually severe monsoonal rains half a world away in Bangladesh, India and Nepal.

In the coming days and weeks, expect to hear politicians describe Harvey as an “act of God” that had little or nothing to do with human-induced climate change. Even if climate change is real, they’ll add, a serious effort to curb greenhouse gas emissions, through a carbon tax or other means, would be too expensive.

On Wednesday, the private company AccuWeather estimated that Harvey could end up costing $190 billion, making it the priciest natural disaster in U.S. history, equal to the combined cost of Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy.

With that kind of price tag atop a torrent of human misery, the question isn’t whether the nation can afford to get serious about global warming. We can’t afford not to.

USA TODAY's editorial opinions are decided by its Editorial Board, separate from the news staff. Most editorials are coupled with an opposing view — a unique USA TODAY feature.

To read more editorials, go to the Opinion front page or sign up for the daily Opinion email newsletter. To respond to this editorial, submit a comment [email protected].
 

matamafia

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...opes-flood-1-000-die-india-monsoon/617173001/

As Houston copes with catastrophic flooding, more than 1,000 die in India monsoon

Siddhant Mohan and Prashun Mazumdar, Special for USA TODAY Published 3:43 p.m. ET Aug. 30, 2017 | Updated 4:07 p.m. ET Aug. 30, 2017

Hours of heavy monsoon downpour and thunderstorms bring life in the Indian capital to a grinding halt as hundreds of thousands of commuters were stranded on waterlogged roads across the region. Video provided by AFP Newslook
AP INDIA RAIN I WEA IND

(Photo: Rajanish Kakade, AP)
18 CONNECTTWEETLINKEDINCOMMENTEMAILMORE

NEW DELHI — Heavy rains paralyzed India, Bangladesh and Nepal for the second day Wednesday, as the worst monsoon in years has caused more 1,000 deaths.

In the western India city of Mumbai, many of its 20 million residents waded through waist-high water trying to get home from work after being stuck there overnight. Buses and trains were halted as roads became impassable.

India is used to regular flooding during monsoon season from June to September, especially in Mumbai, where millions live in shantytowns with poor drainage. Still, this year's floods are unusually severe. And now, the weather service is predicting continuing rain through the week.

Shikha Joshi, 32, a banker in Mumbai, had to spend the night inside a local train that was trapped because the railway tracks were under water.

“No one could move anywhere, so it was better to sit and let the time pass,” said Joshi, who fretted about her 12-year-old brother left home alone — until neighbors went to look after him.

Shivam Arora, 43, a trader in Mumbai, was luckier.

"I have taken the local train to work every day for the past 17 years and never have I seen the network be so adversely affected. It was a complete breakdown of the system," he said.
Commuters make their way through a flooded street following

Commuters make their way through a flooded street following heavy rains in Mumbai, India, Aug. 29, 2017. (Photo: Rajanish Kakade, AP)

"Trains were canceled, stations were closed, places (to take shelter) were jammed, and the situation on the roads was catastrophic," he added. Thankfully, my Facebook feed was filled with people offering their homes as shelters. And I had to crash at my friend's place."

Schools were shut, offices closed early or remained shuttered as the city experienced power outages. People opened their doors to stranded residents and some took to the streets to distribute water and food.

The staggering number of deaths in India and its neighbors occurred when the rains triggered landslides and destroyed thousands of houses, schools, hospitals and farmland, the United Nations said this week.

Over the past two days, Indian officials said at least five people, including two children, died because of the flooding in and around Mumbai. In the state of Bihar in eastern India — one of the worst areas affected — at least 400 have died.

Mahesh Yadav, 42, a farmer from the Araria district of Bihar, had to flee from his home as the nearby Koshi River rose.
Indian villagers stay in temporary shelters along

Indian villagers stay in temporary shelters along National Highway 34 after their houses were flooded in the state of West Bengal on Aug. 22, 2017. (Photo: Diptendu Dutta, AFP/Getty Images)

“I took my family and few canisters of grains and beans on a boat before fleeing the house. Now, one cannot see my house anywhere. It has gone well under the water,” he said after taking refuge with his wife and two children in a makeshift shelter with about 200 other families.

“It is difficult to feed children even after successfully fleeing the flood," said his wife, Aarti Devi, 38. "Every other person is fighting for food.”

In other parts of India, especially remote villages, rescue workers are struggling to get to people left homeless or injured, but the continuous rains are delaying the work, according to police and residents.

Sunder Kumar, 53, a construction worker from the village Valmiki Nagar in the state of Bihar, said in a phone call that he is worried.

“We are living in a temporary shelter which is just a few feet from the floodwater. The situation will get worse if the water rises," he said. "Relief and rescue teams do not know this location, as it is far from their reach.”

King Edward Memorial Hospital in Mumbai and other medical centers were hit with flooding. Some wards were closed and supplies delayed as officials struggled to keep the dirty water out of the facility.

Bilal Bhat, 37, who runs a small shop in Srinagar, was trying to get his son to the doctor. “My son is sick for the last seven days, and the flood has crippled us to move anywhere,” he said. "Now I have to hire a boat to take my son to the hospital."
People walk through a flooded train station during

People walk through a flooded train station during heavy rains in Mumbai, India, Aug. 29, 2017. (Photo: Rajanish Kakade, AP)

The forecast for more rain was terrible news for Mohammad Faizan, 33, a small-goods trader who had to flee his house in Uttar Pradesh’s Bahraich district after the area started filling with the floodwater.

“I could not take anything with me," he said. "I left my family at their grandfather’s home. I am living on the roof of my house, which is the only part left un-submerged, waiting for the water to pass.”

Most just hope the water goes away soon.

Poonam Kumari, 32, used to run a small clothing boutique at her house in Kishanganj in Bihar, but she lost her sewing machine in the flood. She's not sure how she will recover her business, much less manage the next few days.

“My 8-year-old son is suffering from a stomach infection because we had to live on the relief packets that several agencies distributed,” she said. "Even now I cannot provide him good food or treatment because I have no money. All I can wish for is the floodwater to go down very soon.”

Mohan reported from Varanasi, India.

More: 'Catastrophic flooding' persists even as Houston waterways recede

More: Port Arthur mayor: 'Our whole city is underwater'

More: On the heels of Hurricane Harvey, Tropical Storm Irma forms; U.S. impact unknown
 

thumbsdown

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Global warming gives more energy to the storm cells which in turn under the correct circumstances produce these super typhoons.
 

Taksama_b_l

Alfrescian
Loyal
Flooded Texas Chemical plants Goes BANG! BANG!

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...flooded-arkema-chemical-plant-in-crosby-texas


Explosions Reported At Flooded Arkema Chemical Plant In Crosby, Texas


Facebook
Twitter
Google+
Email

August 31, 20176:49 AM ET

Bill Chappell
Twitter

The Arkema plant in Crosby, Texas, is northeast of Houston. The company says it received reports of two explosions at the plant in the early hours of Thursday, Aug. 31.
Google Maps

Updated at 7:50 a.m. ET

The Arkema plant in Crosby, Texas, was the site of a fire and chemical releases Thursday, confirming worries about volatile organic peroxides that had forced the evacuation of the surrounding community over fears that they could explode.

Due to flooding from Hurricane Harvey, the plant lost power — and the ability to safely store chemicals that can explode and cause intense fires. The company had pulled its employees from the facility earlier this week, out of concern for their safety.

Early Thursday, Arkema said that two explosions were reported at the plant northeast of Houston, adding that the Harris County Emergency Operations Center had also told it black smoke was rising from the plant.

Explosions and Smoke Reported at our Arkema Inc. Crosby Plant https://t.co/j2K6RYwMZ8
— ARKEMA (@Arkema_group) August 31, 2017

At a briefing hours later, the county's emergency and safety officials insisted that nothing at the plant had exploded.

"It wasn't an explosion, I want to be very clear. It was not an explosion," Harris County Sheriff Ed Gonzalez said of the incident, which he said was due to containers "basically popping."

Briefing on #Crosby #Arkama https://t.co/KciDWKBSgx
— Harris Co. FMO (@hcfmo) August 31, 2017

As for the gas and smoke rising from the plant, Gonzalez said, "It is not anything toxic, it's not anything we feel is a danger to the community at all."

The sheriff's department says that 15 of its deputies went to the hospital after getting close to the Arkema plant, and that while eight deputies have been released, seven others are still being evaluated. The agency has said the deputies inhaled a "non-toxic irritant."

Gonzalez compared the fumes his deputies encountered to "standing over a barbecue pit, or something like that."
Chemicals At Flooded Texas Plant In Danger Of Exploding
The Two-Way
Chemicals At Flooded Texas Plant In Danger Of Exploding

Whether they're called pops, bangs or explosions, the incident centers on chemical containers in 18-wheeler boxes, said Bob Royall, assistant chief of the Harris County Fire Marshal's Office. Three of the nine boxes have lost refrigeration, but the others are still refrigerated — for now, he said.

"What will happen with these containers that are inside these box vans is, they will pop. And they will heat up, and they will catch on fire. And as such, they will burn with intensity until the fuel is consumed — and then they will die down again."

Royall and Gonzalez refused to call the incident an explosion — a distinction that drew questions from reporters at a dawn briefing in Crosby.

Royall replied that he doesn't want people thinking of "a high-order explosion — something that would be devastating."

He later added, "We haven't had massive explosions, because that's not what we expect."

In this case, Royall said, "We've heard these containers pop ... basically, they had container over-pressure."

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration lists organic peroxides under two hazard categories: one for fire, and one for "exploding bomb."

"Explosions of peroxides have caused many fatal accidents," says the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. In terms of toxicity, the agency says they are "often highly toxic and irritating to the skin, eyes, and mucous membranes."

Arkema says it had planned for the worst — but that Harvey surpassed those plans, flooding the facility with six feet of water. The plant was shut down last Friday, before Harvey made landfall as a category 4 hurricane.

NPR's Debbie Elliott reports from Beaumont, Texas:

"The plant lost power, and its emergency generators. That knocked out refrigeration that keeps the chemicals stable. They're extremely flammable and burn intensely. A chain reaction of explosions is likely, and Arkema warns an environmental release into floodwaters is possible.

"It's not safe to have anyone on site, so the plan is to let the fire burn out. People within a mile and half radius in Crosby were evacuated before the fire."

The company says it began warning officials of the safety risk at the plant days ago, after its contingency plans were defeated.

Saying that the chemicals — which are used in producing plastics, resins, and other materials — "could now explode and cause a subsequent intense fire," the company added, "The high water and lack of power leave us with no way to prevent it."

Arkema says the plant "is in a rural area with no hospitals, schools, correctional facilities or recreational areas or industrial/commercial areas in the vicinity."

As NPR's Wade Goodwyn reports:

"According to the EPA, nearly 4,000 people live within a 3-mile radius. The chemical facility too is abandoned since the last 11 employees who had remained to try to keep the products from igniting were pulled out."





https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...on-as-flooded-chemical-plant-nears-explosion/



Multiple explosions, fire and smoke reported at storm-crippled Texas chemical plant
By Alex Horton and J. Freedom du Lac August 31 at 8:25 AM

The flooded Arkema Inc. chemical plant is seen on Wednesday. (Godofredo A. Vasquez/Houston Chronicle via AP)

CROSBY, Tex. — The operators of a chemical plant left without power by floodwaters said Thursday that multiple explosions have been reported at the facility, and they warned that more problems could occur as rising temperatures make the compounds inside volatile and dangerous.

Arkema, the French chemicals group that runs the plant, said in a statement that it was notified by the Harris County Emergency Operations Center “of two explosions and black smoke” coming from the facility, which was under about six feet of water from the relentless rains unleashed by Harvey.

“A threat of additional explosion remains,” Arkema said in the statement, which urged residents to stay clear of a temporary evacuation zone set up Wednesday.

The Harris County Fire Marshal’s Office reported “a series of chemical reactions” and “intermittent smoke” at the facility; a county official said there weren’t “massive explosions,” and instead referred to the reactions as “pops” followed by fire.

Smoke from the plant left at least one sheriff’s deputy in need of medical treatment. The deputy was taken to a hospital after inhaling fumes from the plant. A total of at least 15 deputies were evaluated by medical teams as a precaution, according to the Harris Country Sheriff’s Office, and some were later released. Arkema officials told the sheriff’s department that the smoke inhaled by deputies is believed to be “a non-toxic irritant.”

The plant in Crosby, about 25 miles northeast of Houston, manufactures organic peroxides, a family of compounds used in everything from pharmaceuticals to construction materials such as counter tops and pipes.

But the material must remain cold — otherwise it can combust. “The material naturally degrades and some types can be unstable unless refrigerated,” Arkema explained.

The facility’s coolant system and inundated backup power generators failed, according to the company: Primary power at the plant went out on Sunday, and two sources of emergency backup power were lost shortly thereafter.

At that point, Richard Rowe, chief executive of Arkema’s North American unit, warned that trouble was likely.

[Residents warned to ‘get out or die’ as Harvey unleashes new waves of punishing rains and flooding]

“We have lost critical refrigeration of the materials on site that could now explode and cause a subsequent intense fire,” Rowe said in a statement Wednesday. “The high water and lack of power leave us with no way to prevent it. We have evacuated our personnel for their own safety. The federal, state and local authorities were contacted a few days ago, and we are working very closely with them to manage this matter. They have ordered the surrounding community to be evacuated, too.”

In the statement, Rowe apologized “to everyone impacted by our situation.”

A mandatory evacuation zone was established for a 1.5-mile radius Wednesday as the last remaining workers at the facility attempted to resolve the problem. Police cruisers and SUVs sealed off access to the plant on Highway 90, which connects Houston and Beaumont. Parts of the highway nearby were underwater.

A continuous flow of trucks, many hauling boats to participate in flood rescue efforts, approached the police barricade near the facility Wednesday afternoon only to be turned away as Crosby Volunteer Fire Department trucks crisscrossed the highway cut-through roads.
A Crosby, Tex. volunteer fireman with an evacuee in tow answers questions on road closures from bystanders near a chemical plant authorities said is going to explode. (Alex Horton/The Washington Post)

The facility, the company noted, “is in a rural area with no hospitals, schools, correctional facilities or recreational areas or industrial/commercial areas in the vicinity.” Arkema said the plant, which employs 57 people, “has never experienced flooding of this magnitude before.”

Ahead of Harvey’s arrival, “the plant made extensive preparations,” bringing extra backup generators to the facility, along with diesel-powered refrigerated tank trailers, Arkema said. But the generators were inundated by water and failed. At that point, the company said, “temperature-sensitive products” were transferred into the diesel-powered refrigerated containers.

Still, the company said Wednesday, “the most likely outcome is that, anytime between now and the next few days, the low-temperature peroxide in unrefrigerated trailers will degrade and catch fire. There is a small possibility that the organic peroxide will release into the flood waters but will not ignite and burn. … In the alternate, there could be a combination event involving fire and environmental release. Any fire will probably resemble a large gasoline fire. The fire will be explosive and intense. Smoke will be released into the atmosphere and dissipate. People should remain clear of the area.”

The Associated Press reported that Arkema was previously required “to develop and submit a risk management plan to the Environmental Protection Agency, because it has large amounts of sulfur dioxide, a toxic chemical, and methylpropene, a flammable gas.”

The plans are supposed to detail the effects of a potential release, evaluate worst-case scenarios and explain a company’s response. In its most recently available submission from 2014, Arkema said potentially 1.1 million residents could be impacted over a distance of 23 miles (37 kilometers) in a worse case scenario, according to information compiled by a nonprofit group and posted on a website hosted by the Houston Chronicle.

But, Arkema added, it was using “multiple layers of preventative and mitigation measures” at the plant, including steps to reduce the amount of substances released, and that made the worst case “very unlikely.”

On Wednesday, James and Deborah Hyer sat, frustrated, in a white pickup truck with a plant water tower in view. They were waiting with their three young children for the police to clear out so they could return to their home in Dayton, about 10 miles north of the barricade.

They were out of milk and water, with local stores either closed or cleaned out of supplies.

Their newly purchased double-wide trailer on top of a hill escaped much of the floodwaters, Deborah Hyer said, but some of their friends living at the bottom experienced complete devastation.

“They lost everything,” she said. One friend of hers, a single mother of five children, lived in a house on 17-foot stilts, but the water rose so high she had to evacuate, she said.

In tiny Kenefick to the northeast, neighborhoods built on the floodplains and banks of the Trinity River were destroyed, and relatives of friends who tried to evacuate were still missing.

[‘Worst fears have been realized’: Family found dead in van swept away by Harvey flood]

As in other areas like Houston and its western suburb of Katy, residents remarked on the quick response of volunteers with fishing boats fanning out as self-deputized rescue units.

“Some authorities are helping, but civilians like the Cajun Navy are helping the most,” James Hyer said.

A Crosby Volunteer Fire Department truck with flashing lights stopped as another man flagged him down to get updates on alternate routes to Dayton.

“We have nowhere to go,” James Hyer pleaded to the firefighter.

“I’d go away from here,” the firefighter responded, though he conceded he did not know which nearby back roads were flooded or, like Highway 90, sealed by police. The Hyer family, resigned, turned around with their backs to Dayton.
Cleveland Walters, Jr. waits for a police barricade to close down on Highway 90 in Crosby, Tex. Police sealed off the highway following reports of an imminent explosion at a chemical plant after floodwaters damaged its coolant systems. (Alex Horton/The Washington Post)

Cleveland Walters Jr., who also lives in Dayton, waited more than an hour outside his black GMC pickup to get home, where his wife and elderly 92-year old father needed to be cared for, he said.

“Dayton is where all my medicine is,” he said, ticking off the medical issues stemming from Agent Orange he said he was exposed to while serving in the U.S. Air Force in Guam during the final years of the Vietnam War.

The runways for B-52 Stratofortress bombers taking off were choked with jungles, and the defoliant sprayed around his tent sparked skin and gastrointestinal problems. He takes about 30 pills a day, he said, and had only a limited supply with him as he sat on Highway 90.

But Walters wasn’t overly concerned about the plant’s reported impending explosion, after working in the oil industry for many years after his service.

“I drive by it about every day. It is what it is,” he said. He left soon after, and like the Hyer family, put more distance between himself and Dayton as rescue vehicles roared to Beaumont.

du Lac reported from Washington. Steven Mufson, Brian Murphy and Mark Berman contributed to this report, which has been updated.

More from The Washington Post:

Before-and-after visuals of the massive flooding in Texas

Harvey’s death toll rises amid stories of harrowing attempts to escape rising waters

What 500-year flooding could look like around five cities

In flooded Houston, the search for bodies begins
 

Polygamist

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Flooded Texas Chemical plants Goes BANG! BANG! What Can Trump do about this?

Will these happen to Jurong Island plants?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ana-texas-border-as-water-recedes-in-houston/
Chemicals ignite at flooded plant in Texas as Harvey’s devastation lingers
By Alex Horton and Mark Berman August 31 at 1:45 PM

CROSBY, Tex. — The remnants of Hurricane Harvey carried its wrath up the Mississippi Delta on Thursday, but not before hammering the Gulf Coast with more punishing cloudbursts and growing threats that included reports of “pops” and “chemical reactions” at a crippled chemical plant and the collapse of the drinking water system in a Texas city.

Authorities warned of the danger posed by the plant in Crosby, located 30 miles northeast of Houston, and the French company operating the facility said explosions were possible. Still, officials offered differing accounts regarding what occurred at the Crosby plant, which makes organic peroxides for use in items such as counter tops and pipes.

The plant’s operators, which had earlier Thursday reported explosions, later said they believe at least one valve “popped” there, though they noted it was impossible to know for sure since all employees had left the site.

The Environmental Protection Agency said it had dispatched personnel to the scene, including aircraft to check the smoke cloud as well as other officials, and did not immediately detect issues regarding toxic material.

“EPA has emergency response personnel on the scene and the agency is currently reviewing data received from an aircraft that surveyed the scene early this morning,” Scott Pruitt, the EPA administrator, said in a statement. “This information indicates that there are no concentrations of concern for toxic materials reported at this time.”

[Threats grow at disabled chemical plant in Texas]

As attention focused on the chemical plant, which Thursday sat under about 6 feet of water following Harvey’s relentless rains, other areas battered by the storm awoke to lingering flooding and the misery left behind.

The storm’s fury was far from over to the east and beyond, as flash flood watches were posted as far away as southern Ohio. The National Weather Service said 4 inches of rain was expected to soak parts of Arkansas, Kentucky and Tennessee with up to 10 inches possible in some isolated areas in western Tennessee.

In Crosby, the chemical plant’s operators, citing local officials, initially said two blasts rocked the facility after it was rendered powerless by floodwaters.

“We were notified by the Harris County Emergency Operations Center of two explosions and black smoke coming from the” plant, the company, Arkema, said in its initial statement.

Other accounts soon followed. The Harris County Fire Marshal’s Office reported “a series of chemical reactions” and “intermittent smoke” at the facility; a county official said there weren’t “massive explosions,” and instead referred to the reactions as “pops” followed by fire.

William “Brock” Long, administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, had called the potential for a chemical plume “incredibly dangerous” at a briefing Thursday morning. A spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, which includes FEMA, said later Thursday that this view had shifted as more information became available from the EPA. She said the EPA is the lead agency on the situation and that FEMA would defer to them.

Still, the operators Arkema warned that there was still a potential for more danger in Crosby. “A threat of additional explosion remains,” said the statement.

Authorities on Wednesday set up an evacuation zone in a 1.5-mile radius from the plant, though the risks could also could be carried by the winds.

[Houston’s floodwaters are receding, but they remain dangerously high in many areas]

The Harris County Sheriff’s Office said that one deputy was hospitalized after inhaling fumes from the plant, while several others sought medical care as a precaution. Some were still being evacuated at a local hospital, the sheriff’s office said, while others had been released.

The Crosby plant manufactures organic peroxides, a family of compounds used in everything from pharmaceuticals to construction materials. But the stores must remain cold otherwise it can combust. A variety of federal agencies have warned about the dangers of organic peroxides the Crosby plant produces. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration warns that “contact of organic peroxides with the eyes should be avoided. Some organic peroxides will cause serious injury to the cornea, even after brief contact, or will be corrosive to the skin.” It added that “many organic peroxides also burn vigorously.”

An earlier study done for the EPA found that organic peroxides are skin and eye irritants and could also cause liver damage.

Water will dilute the chemicals in the plant, but also make them difficult to contain; just as the plant was unable to keep water from flowing in, it will have trouble controlling water flowing out.

An industry safety guide notes that fire or explosion will release a variety of chemicals, including carbon dioxide, as well as flammable vapors including methane or acetone. This could accelerate the decomposition of the chemicals. The guide said that water is “usually the agent of choice to fight fire,” though warm water could accelerate the breakdown, and ignition, of the organic peroxides.

David Guillory, who lives in Crosby, said he was skeptical of local authorities warning people near the plant of the danger, because the region has seen intense flooding. He pointed out that people who remain trapped or haven’t yet evacuated because of road closures might not know about the danger.

Local police told him everyone was safely evacuated, but his brother, who lives right on the edge of the 1.5-mile radius, was still home when Guillory called Wednesday. Guillory’s destroyed home is closer to the plant.

“It’s in my backyard. Literally,” he said. Guillory is the safety director at another plant and said the safety radius established was also due to the possibility of ammonia inhalation, which is incredibly dangerous.

“There’s a lot of ammonia there if the radius is a mile and a half,” he said.

[Harvey is pulling away from Texas and Louisiana, and taking the flood risk with it]

Elsewhere in Texas, seemingly endless water continued to create other issues. Police in Houston, still confronting flooded streets, carried out 18 water rescues overnight Wednesday into Thursday, according to Mayor Sylvester Turner.

“Crisis ebbing but far from over,” Turner tweeted Thursday morning.

In city of Beaumont, which sits near the Louisiana border and was pummeled with rain Wednesday, the water system pumps failed after being swamped by spillover from the swollen Neches River. City officials said in a statement that a secondary water source from nearby wells was also lost.

To the east — in the town of Orange, Tex. — the water rose so high and so fast that people had to rush from their homes.

“It was unbelievable,” said Robin Clark, who was ferried, along with her mother and three dogs, out of her home on a volunteer’s boat.

Dozens of rescued residents stood in a pelting rain outside a Market Basket supermarket waiting for what was next.

“We don’t know what’s going to happen,” said Keeleigh Amodeo, 15, who was waiting with her sister and mother.

[Residents warned to ‘get out or die’ as Harvey unleashes new waves of punishing rains and flooding]

She and others had been told they would be getting on a bus and be taken to a shelter. Where? No one knew. And the buses had failed to show yet. Several people noted that another shelter in town had to be evacuated after it was flooded.

Leonard Teal, however, refused to evacuate his flooded home in Orange. The reason: Someone had to keep watch over all the pets abandoned by neighbors as they fled the flooding.

“It’s shocking but I’ve got several dogs and cats here,” said Teal, whose was huddled with animals on the second floor of his home. He said he would keep the animals for as long as possible.

Orange and other small Texas communities were rendered islands as Harvey dumped record amounts of rain. Interstate 10, which runs close by, was closed to everyone but volunteers in pickup trucks with boats and emergency personnel. Two to three feet of water covered parts of the interstate, while the storm’s death toll had risen to at least 37 people and was expected to increase.

Particularly hard-hit was the coastal city of Port Arthur, which local officials said is now largely underwater. Officials estimated that water had entered a third of the city’s buildings.

Max Bowl, a bowling alley and arcade, had become a way station for residents fleeing the rising water — a dry place with food, water and donated clothing. Getting to the building required a boat on one side to navigate the deep waters. On the other, all it took was a good pair of boots to wade through ankle-deep water.

Overhead, Coast Guard and military helicopters flew past.

“It’s been chaotic, to say the least,” said Mason Simmons, a mechanical engineering student at Lamar University, standing with a group of friends and family on the curb of Max Bowl. They were working as volunteers to help people off boats or out of pickup trucks.

[After disastrous rain around Beaumont and Port Arthur, Harvey surges inland]

Simmons said he’s seen hundreds of people in the roughly six hours he’d been at the bowling alley. Someone nearby said one boat rescued 60 people.

“I think the most incredible part is it’s been community organized, really,” he said. “There’s no one person leading anything. We’re just doing what we can.”

Inside Max Bowl, some people slept at the edge of bowling lanes. Luggage and plastic bags filled with clothing competed for space with racks holding bowling balls.
A close-up view of the flooding in Houston View Graphic

In nearby Beaumont, roads flooded and businesses shuttered as large parking lots were eerily empty. The carpet of a fifth-floor Hampton Inn was soggy after strong winds blasted rain through the inner workings of the room’s air conditioner Tuesday evening.

Fast-food restaurants and other eateries were closed around the hotel, leaving evacuees wet, stranded and hungry.

Hotel staff laid out impromptu ingredients of the classic Texas dish of Frito pie: chili, ground beef, Fritos and tortilla chips, canned cheese and jalapeños, sending its guests back to their rooms full and earning gratitude the next morning. A Hampton Inn employee confirmed Wednesday the chili was served without beans, a faithful rendering of the traditional Texas recipe.

Others still sought supplies elsewhere. The Energy Department said Thursday it would release 500,000 barrels of crude oil from the nation’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve to help with fuel supplies in storm-ravaged areas. It is the first emergency release from the reserve since 2012, the Reuters news agency reported.

Cots are set up in the Burton Coliseum as volunteers prepare for Harvey evacuees in Lake Charles, La., on Wednesday (Jonathan Bachman/Reuters)

Even as Harvey moved away from the Gulf, leaving behind as much as 52 inches of record-breaking rain, forecasters warned of another possible storm that could emerge near Texas early next week.

It hasn’t yet formed, but there are early indications that yet another tropical storm is possible in the western Gulf of Mexico next week. Though rainfall is impossible to predict in a storm that hasn’t yet developed, any additional rain would be significant for the already-devastated region. Not only would it impact and delay recovery efforts, but it could also lead to additional flooding.

“If this system does develop, it could bring additional rainfall to portions of the Texas and Louisiana coasts,” the National Hurricane Center said on Thursday.

[Two volunteer rescuers killed in Harvey floodwaters after bringing families to safety]

New Orleans officials on Wednesday expressed relief that Harvey spared their city, and they encouraged residents to support for those impacted by the storm in Texas. Mayor Mitch Landrieu noted that Houston welcomed many displaced New Orleanians after Hurricane Katrina in 2005.

“This week marked the 12th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina,” Landrieu said. “No city was more welcoming for the citizens of New Orleans than the people of Houston. … This is our opportunity to begin to pay it forward and support those who stood by us.”

Landrieu said that, since Katrina, the city had erected among world’s largest storm surge barriers and most powerful pumping stations. Though pumps had failed in days before Harvey made landfall, city officials said 93 percent of the city’s drainage pumps are now operable.

Officials announced that the 2017 AdvoCare Texas Kickoff game, which was set to take place in Houston and feature the Louisiana State University and Brigham Young University football teams, will instead be held this Saturday at the Mercedes-Benz Superdome in New Orleans. Proceeds from tickets, concessions and parking will still go to organizers in Texas, said Stephen Perry, chief executive of New Orleans’s Convention and Visitors Bureau.

“We’re not doing this for us. We’re doing this for Texas,” Perry said.

But the state of Louisiana did not escape Harvey’s deluge completely. Mike Steele, communications director of the Louisiana Governor’s Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness, said 368 evacuees are being sheltered in the Lake Charles area, with that number growing as people are brought in from communities on the Texas-Louisiana border.

Officials opened Burton Coliseum in Lake Charles to handle the overflow of people displaced from their homes, including Texas residents.

State officials said Louisiana has offered to provide additional shelter space to Texas and is prepared to take on as many as 3,400 Texans in Shreveport.

Louisiana residents themselves were suffering from power outages, and Gov. John Bel Edwards (D) said hundreds of roads across the state were flooded.

“Southwest Louisiana, for now, remains the center of gravity as it relates to this storm in Louisiana,” Edwards said during a news conference Wednesday afternoon. “I would again remind people in Louisiana that we have another 24 hours or so before this storm is out of our state.”

Berman reported from Washington. Todd C. Frankel in Orange, Tex., Lee Powell in Port Arthur, Tex., Ashley Cusick in New Orleans, Leslie Fain in Lake Charles, La., and Brian Murphy, Steven Mufson and Angela Fritz in Washington contributed to this report, which will be updated throughout the day.
 

Polygamist

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Flooded Texas Chemical plants Goes BANG! BANG! What Can Trump do about this?

Fuel Prices Up by Hurricane Harvey


https://www.thestreet.com/story/142...oline-prices-and-prompts-reserve-release.html



Hurricane Harvey Shuts Pipeline, Ups Gasoline Prices and Prompts Reserve Release
The move comes as U.S. gasoline prices skyrocketed Thursday morning due to an East Coast pipeline shutdown by the nation's largest gasoline transporter, Colonial Pipeline Co.
Tom Terrarosa
Aug 31, 2017 11:57 AM EDT

Oil prices were rebounding Thursday morning after the U.S. Department of Energy said it would release 500,000 barrels of crude oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to help mitigate the effects Tropical Storm Harvey is having on motor fuel supply and prices.

West Texas Intermediate crude contracts for October delivery were up almost 3% to $47.27 a barrel, while Brent futures traded up more than 2% to around $52 a barrel.

Refiner Phillips 66 Co. (PSX) will take delivery of the oil at its facility in Lake Charles, La., which has not been affected by Harvey. It is possible the U.S. DOE reaches further arrangements with other area refiners, as the U.S. consumes roughly 20 million barrels of petroleum products daily and more than a fifth of the country's refining capacity has been taken offline by the storm.

U.S. to Block Russia Crude Refinery Deal With Venezuela
How Apple Can Make People Feel Better About Spending $1,000 for the iPhone 8

The Strategic Petroleum Reserve, set up in the early 1970s after the Arab oil embargo caused panics over fuel supply, contained 684 million barrels of oil in May.

"The Department will continue to provide assistance as deemed necessary, and will continue to review incoming requests for SPR crude oil," DOE spokeswoman Jess Syzmanski said in an emailed statement. "Should the Secretary decide to approve additional requests for an emergency exchange of crude oil from the SPR, the public will be notified."

The news comes as gasoline futures were trading at their highest point since mid-2015 on Thursday. The movement in gas is largely due to Wednesday remarks from one major gasoline pipeline operator, Colonial Pipeline Co., which has shutdown its facilities west of Lake Charles and said it would temporarily suspend service of its pipeline delivering gasoline from Houston to Linden, N.J.

Scenes from Hurricane Harvey.
Scenes from Hurricane Harvey.

"Due to supply constraints caused by storm-related refinery shut-downs and the impact to Colonial's facilities west of Lake Charles, Colonial's Line 2, which transports primarily diesel and aviation fuels, will suspend service this evening," the company wrote in a Wednesday evening statement. "For the same reasons, we expect that Line 1, which transports gasoline and is currently operating at reduced rates, will suspend service tomorrow (Thursday)."

The Alpharetta, Ga.-based company said once it able to ensure its facilities are safe to operate and refiners in and east of Lake Charles, La. have the ability to move product to Colonial, it will resume operations.

Tropical Storm Harvey, formerly a Category 4 hurricane, has resulted in thirteen refinery closures so far, including the largest plant in the U.S., Motiva with 603,000 barrels per day of capacity. Motiva, formerly a joint venture between Royal Dutch Sell plc RDS.A and Saudi Arabian Oil Co., is now fully operated by an affiliate of Saudi Refining Inc.

Questions Surround Uber's Chance to Turn a Profit

Motiva is one of three mega-refineries to be shuttered in the Port Arthur/Beaumont region of Texas, according to analysts. Valero Energy Corp. (VLO) and Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) also have shuttered their refineries in the area, both with between 350,000 and 400,000 barrels per day of capacity.

Colonial said that 13 of the 26 refineries that connect to the its system are located between Houston and Lake Charles.

And several Gulf Coast refinery and chemical plant operators have reported leaks and explosions at facilities in recent days, including Exxon Mobil and Arkema SA.

The extent of damage to Gulf Coast refineries and the duration of outages is uncertain at this point, but Goldman, Sachs & Co. estimated Thursday that 10% of the currently offline capacity could remain unavailable for several months.

In the meantime, analysts are betting refiners in the Midwest and Mid-Continent will see elevated stock prices, including CVR Refining LP (CVRR) , Delek US Holdings Inc. (DK) and HollyFrontier Corp. (HFC) ; Marathon Petroleum Corp. (MPC) and PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) and Valero.
 

Taksama_b_l

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Flooded Texas Chemical plants Goes BANG! BANG! What Can Trump do about this?

One more Hurricane on the way to US again and one more Typhoon on the way again to HK.


http://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/31/us/hurricane-irma-forecast-weather/index.html


Powerful Hurricane Irma could be next weather disaster


By Brandon Miller, CNN Meteorologist

Updated 0555 GMT (1355 HKT) September 1, 2017
IN SPACE - In this handout photo provided by NASA, Hurricane Patricia is seen from the International Space Station. The hurricane made landfall on the Pacfic coast of Mexico on October 23. (Photo by Scott Kelly/NASA via Getty Images)
IN SPACE - In this handout photo provided by NASA, Hurricane Patricia is seen from the International Space Station. The hurricane made landfall on the Pacfic coast of Mexico on October 23. (Photo by Scott Kelly/NASA via Getty Images)

IN SPACE - In this handout photo provided by NASA, Hurricane Patricia is seen from the International Space Station. The hurricane made landfall on the Pacfic coast of Mexico on October 23. (Photo by Scott Kelly/NASA via Getty Images)
What you should know about hurricanes
how hurricanes are named orig_00002729.jpg
How are hurricanes named?
This picture taken on July 26, 2015 shows a child playing in a fountain on a square to cool himself amid a heatwave in Binzhou, eastern China's Shandong province. CHINA OUT AFP PHOTO (Photo credit should read STR/AFP/Getty Images)
What NOT to do in a heat wave
Heat wave breaks records in the West
NEW YORK - JULY 10: A man wipes sweat from his face July 10, 2007 in New York City. New York City is experiencing a second day of a heat wave with temperatures in the upper 90`s and uncomfortable humidity levels. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Nighttime 'lows' more dangerous than highs
Storm chasing photographers take photos underneath a rotating supercell storm system in Maxwell, Nebraska on September 3, 2016. Although multiple tornado warnings were issued throughout the area, no funnel cloud touched down. / AFP / Josh Edelson / XGTY RESTRICTED TO EDITORIAL USE / MANDATORY CREDIT: &quot;AFP PHOTO / Josh EDELSON&quot; / NO MARKETING / NO ADVERTISING CAMPAIGNS / DISTRIBUTED AS A SERVICE TO CLIENTS == (Photo credit should read JOSH EDELSON/AFP/Getty Images)
Is it a tornado watch or warning?
4-year-old girl blown away by wind
A charter MD83 slid off Runway 23L upon departure from Willow Run Airport at 2:55 Eastern Time this afternoon. The intended destination of the aircraft was Dulles International Airport, Washington DC. The FAA is investigating.
Strong winds blow team's plane off runway
Lightning strike causes tree trunk to explode
2016: The hottest year on record
freezing rain sleet snow orig_00000810.jpg
Freezing rain vs sleet
lake-effect snow orig_00000000.jpg
What is lake-effect snow?
A man carries personal items through a flooded street caused by remnants of Hurricane Matthew on October 11, 2016 in Fair Bluff, North Carolina. Thousands of homes have been damaged in North Carolina as a result of the storm and many are still under threat of flooding.
Wind isn't the biggest worry during a hurricane
water rescues human chain jnd orig vstan_00004203.jpg
Woman trapped in car during flash flood
blizzard explainer defintion nws orig_00011424.jpg
Is this storm really a blizzard?
Story highlights

Hurricane Irma is a powerful Category 3 and has rapidly intensified on Thursday
Irma is in the open Atlantic, and it's too early to know where it will hit

(CNN)While much of the United States' focus is still on Texas and the destruction left behind by Hurricane Harvey and its historic rainfall, powerful Hurricane Irma is rapidly intensifying in the open Atlantic and poses a major threat to the Caribbean and potentially the United States next week.
Irma was named as a tropical storm on Wednesday morning and by Thursday afternoon it had strengthened into a large Category 3 hurricane, with winds of 115 mph.

Hurricane Irma satellite image
Hurricane Irma satellite image
Such explosive strengthening is known as "rapid intensification," defined by the National Hurricane Center as having its wind speed increase at least 30 knots (35 mph) in 24 hours.
"Irma has become an impressive hurricane," the National Hurricane Center said on Thursday, noting the rapid intensification, and saying "this is a remarkable 50 knot [58 mph] increase from yesterday at this time."
How are hurricanes named?
how hurricanes are named orig_00002729

How are hurricanes named? 01:38
Hurricane Harvey underwent rapid intensification last week, just before landfall, which brought it from a tropical storm to a Category 4 hurricane when it moved onshore near Corpus Christi.
Irma is a classic "Cape Verde hurricane," a type of hurricane that forms in the far eastern Atlantic, near the Cape Verde Islands (now known as the Cabo Verde Islands) and tracks all the way across the Atlantic. Cape Verde storms frequently are some of the largest and most intense hurricanes. Examples are Hurricane Hugo, Hurricane Floyd, and Hurricane Ivan.
Hurricane Irma is forecast to continue to strengthen as it moves westward over the next five days and the official forecast from the National Hurricane Center puts a dangerous Category 4 Hurricane Irma on the doorstep of the Caribbean by the end of the five-day forecast on Tuesday afternoon.

#Irma has continued to strengthen over the eastern Atlantic and is now a major hurricane. Details at https://t.co/tW4KeGdBFb pic.twitter.com/gRAl1hzRnN
— NHC Atlantic Ops (@NHC_Atlantic) August 31, 2017

A strong high-pressure ridge to the north of Irma, over the Atlantic, is steering the storm to the west and limiting the wind shear in the upper levels of the atmosphere, which has allowed the storm to grow so quickly. Wind shear is like hurricane kryptonite, and prevents storms from forming or gaining strength.
Unfortunately, Irma will remain in a low-shear environment for the next several days, so there isn't much hope that Irma will weaken any time soon.
2017 Atlantic Hurricane Season Fast Facts
2017 Atlantic Hurricane Season Fast Facts
TRACK THE STORM HERE
There is considerable confidence that Hurricane Irma will track to the west through the weekend and then take a slight jog to the southwest early next week in response "to a building ridge [of high pressure] over the central Atlantic."
From there the forecast becomes a lot less clear, with some major differences among some of the key models meteorologists use to forecast hurricanes, differences so drastic that in one instance Irma slides harmlessly back out to sea and in another it makes multiple disastrous landfalls in the Caribbean and likely the United States after that.
The European model, or ECMWF, and the American GFS model have had some notable showdowns before, most notably with Hurricane Sandy.
Hurricane Sandy Fast Facts
Hurricane Sandy Fast Facts
With Sandy, the ECMWF correctly predicted a landfall in the northeast nearly a week ahead, while the GFS continually kept the storm offshore in what became a major black eye for the US weather modeling industry. There have been other examples where the GFS model has performed better than the European model, such as with a few major snowstorms in the northeast.
Right now, the GFS has Irma taking a more northerly track that curves to the north before it reaches the Caribbean, thus making a US landfall much less likely.
The European model keeps the storm tracking further west and into the Caribbean by the middle of next week.
European vs American weather models
European vs American weather models
Ryan Maue, a meteorologist with WeatherBell Analytics, said, "The ECMWF sees a much stronger ridge or Bermuda High [than the GFS] which forces Irma west, whereas the GFS has a weaker ridge and a more rightward, parabolic track."
"The prospects for major impacts anywhere from Cuba to Carolinas is concerning for this very reliable model," Maue said.
Irma is still more than 1,700 miles east of the Leeward Islands and any impacts from the storm shouldn't be felt until Tuesday or Wednesday for the Leeward Islands and Puerto Rico.
The forecast picture should become clearer after the weekend as we see which model correctly predicts Irma's path.
Bottom line: Hurricane Irma is already a powerful hurricane and looks to only become more so. Those with interests in the Caribbean and southeast US coast should pay close attention to the forecast.

CNN Meteorologist's Dave Hennen and Taylor Ward contributed to this piece.



170524205250-hurricane-patricia-exlarge-169.jpg




http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...kong-set-typhoon-standby-third-time-two-weeks



Tropical storm Mawar expected to be closest to Hong Kong on Sunday afternoon


After batterings by Typhoon Hato and Severe Tropical Storm Pakhar, city on standby for more rain and wind
PUBLISHED : Friday, 01 September, 2017, 10:26am
UPDATED : Friday, 01 September, 2017, 2:01pm

Nikki Sun
Nikki Sun
Share

PrintEmail
Related topics
Hong Kong weather
Typhoon Hato
Severe Tropical Storm Pakhar
Tropical depression Mawar
More on this story
The Heng Fa Chuen waterfront in Hong Kong takes another beating from Pakhar. Photo: Handout
Education & Community
Pakhar lands second punch on battered Hong Kong, Macau
28 Aug 2017
Related Articles
A beach raft that washed ashore in Shek O after Severe Tropical Storm Pakhar hit Hong Kong on Sunday. Phone: Nora Tam
Health & Environment
‘Third major storm in two weeks due to hit Hong Kong on Sunday’
31 Aug 2017
Pollution hangs over Hong Kong. Photo: Felix Wong
Health & Environment
Hong Kong residents told to limit time outdoors due to pollution
30 Aug 2017
Hongkongers could be in for more bad weather. Photo: Sam Tsang
Health & Environment
Another tropical storm threatens Hong Kong
30 Aug 2017

Tropical depression Mawar, which is threatening to bring Hong Kong its third typhoon in only two weeks, was expected to be closest to the city on Sunday afternoon when it makes landfall in Shantou, eastern Guangdong, according to weather officials.

Senior science officer Cheng Yuen-chung from the Observatory said the depression might intensify into a typhoon over the weekend, but whether it would trigger the signal No 8 warning depended on its strength as it edged closer to land.

If Mawar prompts the No 8 warning signal, it would be the first time a T8 is issued for five consecutive storms to hit Hong Kong since tropical cyclone records began in 1946.

As of early Friday morning Mawar was lingering over the northeastern South China Sea and was expected to move slowly into eastern Guangdong province and the Pearl River Estuary over the weekend, the Observatory said.

“When Mawar takes on a more definite northerly track and edges closer to the coast of Guangdong, the Observatory will consider issuing the standby signal No 1 on Friday,” authorities said in a statement released in the morning.

The latest forecast, issued at 10.15am on Friday, indicated that Mawar could indeed take a more northerly track, with landfall expected on Sunday.

Mawar’s arrival in the region comes quick on the heels of Typhoon Hato, which caused flooding and flight cancellations in Hong Kong before wreaking even more destruction in Macau and Guangdong around August 23, and Severe Tropical Storm Pakhar, which forced hundreds of flights to be cancelled in Hong Kong less than a week later.
Only one plane lands in Hong Kong as Typhoon Hato wreaks havoc with flight schedules

As schools reopened after a long summer holiday on Friday, the weather was likely to be bad, with showers and thunderstorms expected in the afternoon. It was expected to be hot and hazy during the day, with a maximum temperature of 32 degrees Celsius.

Heavy rain and strong winds were expected over the weekend.
 

matamafia

Alfrescian
Loyal
33% of Bangladesh is FLOODED now!

https://www.vox.com/world/2017/8/30...bangladesh-monsoon-nepal-41-million-1000-dead



Log In or Sign Up

Explainers
Politics & Policy
More

Photos: Devastating monsoon rains affect 41 million people in South Asia
Two weeks of flooding have devastated communities across India, Nepal, and Bangladesh.
Updated by Sarah Wildman Aug 30, 2017, 3:20pm EDT

tweet
share

Mumbai floods August 29, 2017 Imtiyaz Shaikh /Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

While all eyes have been on the devastation from Hurricane Harvey in Texas, catastrophic floods have also been wreaking havoc more than 8,000 miles away in South Asia. Unusually heavy monsoon rains over the last several weeks have killed over 1,000 people across India, Nepal, and Bangladesh. In all, over 41 million people have suffered the direct impact of the rain.

Already deeply impoverished rural communities have been devastated as landslides and rising waters have taken away homes — as well as people. In Nepal, villagers traveled on makeshift rafts to escape rising waters, and elephants were used to help rescue trapped tourists and residents.

The most recent city hit is Mumbai, India’s financial center, parts of which are under several feet of water. On Tuesday, traffic in parts of the city came to a near total halt, schools were closed, and the city’s largest hospital was partially flooded.

These images from the scenes of the flooding give you a sense of the scale of the catastrophe across the region.
Indians wade along a flooded street during heavy rain in Mumbai, India on August 29, 2017. Imtiyaz Shaikh /Anadolu Agency/Getty Images
Indians wade through a flooded street during heavy rain showers in Mumbai on August 29, 2017. PUNIT PARANJPE/AFP/Getty Images
Nepali residents swim with a rubber ring in a flooded area in the Birgunj Parsa district, some 200km south of Kathmandu, on August 13, 2017. MANISH PAUDEL/AFP/Getty Images
Nepali residents move their buffalos across a flooded area at Birgunj Parsa district, some 200km south of Kathmandu, on August 13, 2017. AFP/Getty Images
Bystanders look on as floodwaters rage near a house in Kurigram, northern Bangladesh on August 14, 2017. STRINGER/AFP/Getty Images
Flood-affected villagers on makeshift banana rafts come to collect flood relief near the river Brahmaputra in Pokoria village, east of Gauhati, northeastern Assam state, India. AP Photo/Anupam Nath
Nepali men cross floodwaters in Tilathi Village in Saptari District, some 450km southeast of the capital Kathmandu, on August 15, 2017. PRAKASH MATHEMA/AFP/Getty Images
Children in Mumbai’s flooded streets August 29, 2017 AP Photo/Rajanish Kakade
Flood-affected villagers on makeshift banana rafts come to collect flood relief near the river Brahmaputra in Pokoria village, east of Gauhati, northeastern Assam state, India. AP Photo/Anupam Nath



 

yblzh

Alfrescian
Loyal
郑海船 Singapore Casket pse help USA Funerals no enough

Russia & Putin will no longer help because they are already on fighting terms.




http://www.chron.com/news/houston-t...morgue-pushed-to-limit-as-Harvey-12168466.php


Harris County morgue pushed to limit as Harvey death toll rises
Harvey's rising death toll prompts call for additional storage facilities

By Cindy George Updated 10:31 pm, Friday, September 1, 2017

The rising death toll from Tropical Storm Harvey has stressed the operations of the Harris County morgue, prompting officials to call for extra storage support.

The Harris County Institute of Forensic Sciences has capacity for 203 bodies. As of Friday afternoon, there were 134 bodies in storage, according to Tricia Rudisill Bentley, a spokeswoman for the agency.

In response, the state has provided a refrigerated truck for "extra storage capacity as ongoing search and recovery efforts continue over the next several weeks," Bentley said.

As of 9 p.m. Friday, the institute had confirmed 28 storm-related deaths in Harris County - all but one from drowning in floodwaters.

The demand for space has eased as the week has progressed and bodies have been released. On Thursday, the medical examiner's office sent 30 cases to funeral homes.

A week after the storm made landfall as a Category 4 hurricane on the night of Aug. 25, local officials had reported more than 50 people were confirmed dead or feared deceased in the state as a result of Harvey and the catastrophic flooding the storm unleashed.

Volunteers among dead

The medical examiner's office on Friday night confirmed the deaths of two missing volunteer rescuers who were tossed into Greens Bayou after their boat struck a power line on Monday, sending an electrical jolt through the vessel.

Officials said the bodies of Gustavo Rodriguez, 40, and a 33-year-old man were found on the banks of Greens Bayou on Thursday.

Relatives and friends had hoped that Rodriguez and Benjamin Vizuet, 33, had managed to survive the incident, which killed two other volunteer rescuers: Jorge Raul Perez, 33, and 45-year-old Yanir Rubio-Vizuet.

The four were part of a group of five, accompanied by two journalists with the London-based Daily Mail, who ventured out Monday afternoon to rescue neighbors in the Northshore area. The boat disappeared while headed toward a wheelchair-bound resident's home.

The journalists, senior reporter Alan Butterfield and photographer Ruaridh Connellan, were found alive with the fifth volunteer, Jose Vizuet. The trio were clinging to trees along the bayou until they were rescued Tuesday and transported to a hospital for treatment, the Daily Mail reported.

Meanwhile, deaths that appear to be the result of medical emergencies during the storm continued to add up.

Among the recently confirmed storm deaths was Wilma Ratliff Ellis, 73. The medical examiner's office reported that she was found floating Monday during a Coast Guard rescue operation.

Her story had appeared to be a joyous one after she was rescued earlier in the day. Family members put the elderly woman on a boat when rescuers arrived with only one seat left, the (New Orleans) Times-Picayune newspaper reported. She was taken to a local high school, but remained without relatives because the boat never returned for other stranded family members. Ellis apparently wandered from the school and was swept away in floodwaters.

She was discovered floating face-down and lifeless by Joshua Lincoln of Madisonville and two other rescuers, who resuscitated her, the newspaper reported Monday. She was wearing a hospital bracelet at the time of the second rescue, said Ellis, who gave details of the incident.

The men dropped Ellis at a gas station where a local businessman promised to look after her, then left to continue pulling people from flooded homes.

Lincoln said he had received frantic calls on Wednesday from family members asking him to help locate Ellis. The medical examiner's office confirmed Thursday that she was pronounced dead at LBJ Hospital at around 6:30 p.m. Monday.

Officials also removed the case of another elderly resident, Ronald Zaring, from the list of storm-related deaths. The 83-year-old, having been evacuated from a Friendswood nursing home, died Tuesday of a heart attack while aboard a charter bus taking patients to Huntsville. He also had pneumonia.

Nine outside Houston

Other drowning victims confirmed this week include Calvin Oran Montalbano, 54, found Tuesday in a grassy area near the Eastex Freeway; Benito Cavazos Juarez, 42, found face-down in a parking lot on Tuesday after waters receded at the East Freeway and Holland Avenue; Martin Salazar, 49, found Wednesday on Preston Avenue in Pasadena after evacuating his home; Michael Tucker, 66, who was found Tuesday in 4 feet of water after leaving his residence; Keisha Monique Williams, 32, found Wednesday on Woodforest Boulevard in Houston; and Colby Henry Osorno, 24, found Thursday in the Greens Bayou/Houston Ship Channel area. Victor Manuel Acevedo, 67, found Monday in an alley on Arkansas Street in East Houston.

The medical examiner's office late Friday confirmed one other additional victim: Efrain Angel, 26, who was found Tuesday in a drainage ditch near Harris County Katy Park.

At least nine people outside the Houston area have also perished, and details have emerged about some of those deaths.

On Monday night, Joshua Aedan Feuerstein, 33, of The Woodlands was caught in rapid floodwater on Fish Creek Thoroughfare near the Woodforest subdivision, according to Montgomery County Sheriff's Office. Feuerstein became distressed and tried to get help, but rescuers and bystanders were unable to get to him before he drowned, authorities said. He is one three persons to die on Montgomery County. Two people were killed in Jasper County around late Tuesday when a tree fell on their truck as they travelled down FM 777. The Texas Department of Public Safety identified the deceased Wednesday as Russell Barnes, 51, and Ginger Barnes, 43, both of Alvin.

Jay R. Jordan and Margaret Kadifa contributed to this report.
Most Read

1 Photos: Alley Theatre destroyed by Harvey
2 Maps show what Harvey's impact would look like in other U.S....
3 After Harvey, Houstonians eye long road to recovery
4 GoFundMe to send Houston meteorologist Jeff Lindner on...
5 Texas woman finds giant wolf spider outside her home after Harvey
6 Inmates inside Beaumont's federal prison share stories of grim...
7 Houston Chronicle photo editors: These are the most moving...
8 NASA image shows Harvey's muddy flood waters washing into Gulf...
9 Don't throw out carpets, appliances, sofas just yet
10 Harris County morgue pushed to limit as Harvey death toll rises

Get News Sent to You
Choose from our most popular newsletters below. Or, visit www.chron.com/newsletters to see more options.
Breaking News
Morning News Update
Bayou City Buzz (evening)
Preview: Weekly Houston Entertainment Guide
E-mail:


View Comments





9e2e9448689f4eab8b9518487a81bba4.jpg


www.bostonherald.com/news/national/...blems_plague_texas_as_funerals_for_dead_begin



Post-Harvey problems plague Texas as funerals for dead begin

Associated Press Saturday, September 02, 2017
Credit: The Associated Press
In this Aug. 30, 2017, photo, barges are secured by tugboats in the flood-swollen Burnet Bay along the Houston Ship Channel in Houston. (Tom Fox/The Dallas Morning News via AP)
prev next
comments

HOUSTON — One week after Harvey roared into the Gulf Coast, residents of a Texas city struggled with no drinking water, fires continued to erupt at a stricken chemical plant and funerals began for some of the mounting toll of victims.

In Beaumont, Texas, home to almost 120,000, people waited in a line that stretched for more than a mile to get bottled water after the municipal system failed earlier this week.

Thick black smoke and towering orange flames shot up Friday after two trailers of highly unstable compounds blew up at Arkema, a flooded chemical plant in Crosby, the second fire there in two days.

And in Houston, friends and family gathered Friday evening to remember 42-year-old Benito Juarez Cavazos, one of 42 people whose deaths are attributed to Harvey. Cavazos came to Texas illegally from Mexico 28 years ago and was in the process of getting his green card.

"It's very unfortunate that right when he finally had hopes of being able to maybe go to Mexico soon to go see his family it all went downhill," his cousin, Maria Cavazos, said. "Sadly, he's going back to Mexico, but in an unfortunate way."

President Donald Trump announced plans Friday to make his second visit to the region devastated by Harvey. On Saturday, he will be in Houston and Lake Charles, Louisiana, to survey the damage. The White House said he would have time during the visit with the first lady to talk to residents.

Earlier Friday, Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner announced that ongoing releases of water from two reservoirs could keep thousands of homes flooded for up to 15 days. He told residents that if they stayed and later needed help, first responders' resources could be further strained.

Residents of the still-flooded western part of Houston were asked to evacuate due to the releases from two reservoirs protecting downtown. The ongoing releases were expected to keep some homes flooded that had been filled with water earlier in the week. Homes that are not currently flooded probably will not be affected, officials said.

Some of the affected houses have several feet (meters) of water in them, and the water reaches to the rooftops of others, district meteorologist Jeff Lindner said.

Turner pleaded for more high-water vehicles and more search-and-rescue equipment as the nation's fourth-largest city continued looking for any survivors or corpses that might have somehow escaped notice in flood-ravaged neighborhoods.

Search teams quickly worked their way down streets, sometimes not even knocking on doors if there were obvious signs that all was well — organized debris piles or full cans of trash on the curb, for instance, or neighbors confirming that the residents had evacuated.

Authorities considered it an initial search, though they did not say what subsequent searches would entail or when they would commence.

Turner also asked the Federal Emergency Management Agency to provide more workers to process applications from thousands of people seeking government help. The mayor said he will request a preliminary aid package of $75 million for debris removal alone.

The storm had lost most of its tropical characteristics but remained a source of heavy rain that threatened to cause flooding as far north as Indiana.

By Friday evening, Harvey had dumped more than 9 inches (23 centimeters) of rain in parts of Arkansas and Tennessee and more than 8 inches (20 centimeters) in spots in Alabama and Kentucky. Its remnants were expected to generate another 1 to 3 inches (2.5 to 8 centimeters) over parts of Kentucky, Indiana, Ohio and West Virginia.

National Weather Service meteorologists expect Harvey to break up and merge with other weather systems over the Ohio Valley late Saturday or Sunday.

An estimated 156,000 dwellings were damaged by flooding in Harris County, or more than 10 percent of all structures in the county database, according to the flood control district for the county, which includes Houston.

Figures from the Texas Department of Public Safety indicated that nearly 87,000 homes had major or minor damage and at least 6,800 were destroyed.

Harvey initially came ashore Aug. 25 as a Category 4 hurricane, then went back out to sea and lingered off the coast as a tropical storm for days. The storm brought five straight days of rain totaling close to 52 inches (1.3 meters) in one location, the heaviest tropical downpour ever recorded in the continental U.S.

Far out over the Atlantic, Hurricane Irma was following a course that could bring it near the eastern Caribbean Sea by early next week. The Category 2 storm was moving northwest at nearly 13 mph (20 kph). No coastal watches or warnings were in effect.

___

Amy reported from Beaumont, Texas. Associated Press writers Johnny Clark in Beaumont, Texas; Brian Melley in Houston; Paul Weber and Will Weissert in Austin; Diana Heidgerd, David Warren, Jamie Stengle, Emily Schmall and Adam Kealoha Causey in Dallas; Michael Kunzelman in Baton Rouge, Louisiana; and Tammy Webber in Chicago contributed to this report.

___

Sign up for AP's daily newsletter showcasing our best all-formats reporting on Harvey and its aftermath: http://apne.ws/ahYQGtb .
Related Articles
 

yblzh

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: 郑海船 Singapore Casket pse help USA Funerals no enough

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/09/01/us/hurricanes-harvey-and-irma/index.html


Hurricane redux? Storms sometimes hit the same area


By Ralph Ellis, CNN

Updated 0106 GMT (0906 HKT) September 2, 2017
Track of Hurricane Rita compared to Hurricane Katrina in 2005.
Track of Hurricane Rita compared to Hurricane Katrina in 2005.

(CNN)A week after Hurricane Harvey slammed into the Gulf coast, the people of Texas are still reeling. They need food, water and shelter -- not the news that another hurricane has formed in the Atlantic Ocean.
Yet Hurricane Irma is out there right now, growing in strength and tracking in a westward direction.
Can anyone blame the beleaguered people of Texas and Louisiana for asking, "Is this storm going to hit here?"

The short answer: Probably not.
With Irma days away from any possible landfall, the chances of that storm making its way into the Gulf of Mexico are very slim, CNN meteorologist Brandon Miller said Friday.
Powerful Hurricane Irma could be next weather disaster
Powerful Hurricane Irma could be next weather disaster
The East Coast faces a much greater threat from potential impacts from Hurricane Irma than those areas of Texas and Louisiana that were devastated by Harvey, he said.
Nobody knows where Irma will go, Miller stressed. The storm is probably five days from affecting the Bahamas and a week from impacting any part of the United States, he said.
But he cautions that there have been recent instances in which storms have packed a one-two punch.
The people of the Gulf Coast, for instance, still talk about how Rita came hard on the heels of Katrina.
August 29, 2005: Katrina made landfall in Louisiana after passing over south Florida and gaining power in the Gulf of Mexico. The storm topped the levees in New Orleans and flooded large parts of the city. When it was all over, Katrina had caused $108 billion in damages in several states and had a death toll of 1,833.
September 24, 2005: Hurricane Rita made landfall near the Texas-Louisiana border while the Katrina cleanup effort was just getting started in earnest. Flooding reoccurred in New Orleans. At least seven deaths were attributed to Rita and damages were estimated at $12 billion.
Four hurricanes crossed Florida in 2004
Four hurricanes crossed Florida in 2004
Let's not forget about Florida in 2004, when four storms struck, including three hurricanes that moved across the central part of the Sunshine State. Though not as deadly as Katrina, the storms caused billions of dollars in damages and killed at least 40 people in the United States, plus many more in the Caribbean.
August 13, 2004: Hurricane Charley made landfall south of Fort Myers, on the west coast of the state, as a Category 4 storm.
September 5, 2004: Hurricane Frances made landfall near Stuart, on Florida's east coast, as a Category 2 storm.
September 26, 2004: Hurricane Jeanne, a Category 4 storm, struck Florida near the spot where Frances made landfall 21 days earlier.
Adding to Florida's misery in 2004 was Hurricane Ivan, which didn't make landfall in the state, but struck just 10 miles west near Gulf Shores, Alabama.
Jeff Krauskopf, mayor of Stuart when the storm hit, said the city was suffering from hurricane fatigue, according to a CNN.com article from 2004.
"It just doesn't stop," he said. "It's like that song, Frances to the left of me, Ivan to the right, and Jeanne, I'm stuck in the middle with you."
Tornadoes have also come one after the other, Miller noted.
A devastating twister hit Moore, Oklahoma, on May 20, 2013, killing at least 24 people.
Eleven days later, reports reached the town of another approaching storm. Residents panicked and tried to drive away from danger, but only drove into the storm's path, CNN affiliate WPTV reported.
At least eight people died that day.


170901162306-katrina-vs-rita-2005-large-169.jpg


170901161503-florida-4-storms-2004-large-169.jpg
 
Top