What about a Chinese man having a child with a Caucasian woman?
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Serious Race Is Important in SG
- Thread starter ckmpd
- Start date
What about a Chinese man having a child with a Caucasian woman?
When you are not sure, refer to SG's NRIC
That is usually classified as rape....:*:
In inverted commas?
The child is legally chinese by race.
Any chinese man who allows his child to be known as Eurasian is b.ll less and a disgrace to his ancestors
Last edited:
In any true democracy...the Police, Army, Judiciary and public servants are totally independent of the gahmen.
In SG you say lah.....
The Singaporean convention is to follow the father. So the answer to your question is 'Indian'.
Of course, in a matrilear society, there's no reason why one can't follow the mum.
Ultimately, race and ethnicity are social constructions, but that's another topic altogether.
Race is of course an important part of the social sphere in Singapore....even when you want to sell your HDB, it must be to a certain race.
Consistency is the operative word. If the state chooses to define race in a particular way for policy making and demographic purposes, then it has to abide by it in all situations. Then again, when was the PAP known for its integrity?
If you can remember on the basis of the formation of GRCs (after Potong Pair won by Chiam), you will now better appreciate why the sudden need for a reserved race EP election this time round.
"Race" is not a social construction it is biological.
Even if you accept the need for a reserved race EP, is there a need to morph and mangle the racial definition for 'Malay' to the extent that Indians, Pakistanis, Arabs and maybe even your pet corgi can now be considered 'Malay'?
Disagree. Clines are biologically derived constructions. Race and ethnicity are socio-cultural constructions, and hence arbitrary to a certain degree.
My dog must be Malay because he does not like Pork. He also spends most of his time relaxing in his favorite corner.
Who else you think now can come close to being a likely candidate wearing PAP pants...especially when you set such a high qualification bar on Malays too?
I'll vote for your dog any day over Halimah Yacob.
And who raised the bar so high, pray tell?
That was before they realised to their horror...Halimah is a actually a keling :o
Similar threads
