• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

You can bet your last dollar that Tiongs will steal / copy this

Howitzer

Alfrescian
Loyal


Regardless whether good or lousy.... :biggrin:


US Navy considers electromagnetic railgun for futuristic new warship


PUBLISHED : Monday, 15 February, 2016, 2:49pm
UPDATED : Monday, 15 February, 2016, 2:49pm

Associated Press in Bath, Maine

c982b88c-d3ae-11e5-855c-84ae337d929d_1280x720.jpg


A projectile blasts through a barrier in a test of a railgun by US Navy researchers, in this image captured by a high-speed camera. Photo: US Navy

Development of a futuristic weapon depicted in video games and science fiction is going well enough that a Navy admiral wants to skip an at-sea prototype in favour of installing an operational unit aboard a destroyer planned to go into service in 2018.

The Navy has been testing an electromagnetic railgun and could have an operational unit ready to go on one of the new Zumwalt-class destroyers under construction at Bath Iron Works in Maine.

Admiral Pete Fanta, the Navy’s director of surface warfare, has floated the idea of foregoing the current plan to put a prototype on another vessel this year and instead put it directly on the future USS Lyndon B. Johnson, though no final decision has been made.

c9b41ff8-d3ae-11e5-855c-84ae337d929d_486x.jpg


A prototype railgun is displayed aboard the USS Millinocket in San Diego in 2014. Photo: US Navy

“The Zumwalt-class is one of a number of options being explored for the electromagnetic railgun,” said Lt. Cmdr. Hayley Sims, a Navy spokeswoman. “Due to the size, weight and power requirements, some platforms will be better suited for the technology than others.”

Railguns use electricity instead of gunpowder to accelerate a projectile at six or seven times the speed of sound — creating enough kinetic energy to destroy targets.

It’s advanced technology that holds the possibility of providing an effective weapon at pennies on the dollars compared to smart bombs and missiles.

There has been talk since the inception of the Zumwalt programme that the massive stealth destroyers would be a likely candidate for the weapon because of its power plant. The USS Johnson will be the third and final destroyer in the Zumwalt class.

cc6c77ea-d3ae-11e5-855c-84ae337d929d_486x.jpg


The USS Zumwalt is guided by tugboats as it arrives in Portland Harbour, in Maine in December. Photo: AP

The180-metre-long warship uses marine turbines similar to those that propel the Boeing 777 to help produce up to 78 megawatts of electricity for use in propulsion, weapons and sensors. That’s more than enough power for the railgun.

If it’s placed on the warship, the system could replace one of the forward turrets housing a 155mm gun that fires rocket-propelled projectiles.

For now, however, the official plan remains for the railgun prototype to be tested aboard a joint high speed vessel this year. But there are concerns that the plan may be pushed back into 2017, and Fanta suggested skipping it altogether.

The railgun, along with laser weaponry, are two futuristic technologies that Fanta said have evolved from being a matter of scientific research to one of practical engineering.

The Navy is interested in those weapons — along with smart munitions that can improve existing naval guns — because of their low cost as well as lethality.

“The Navy is determined to increase the offensive punch of the surface warships,” said Loren Thompson, a defense analyst at the Lexington Institute. “To do that with a limited budget, it needs to look at everything from smart munitions to railguns to lasers.”

Bath Iron Works, a subsidiary of General Dynamics, had no comment about the railgun.



 

ThrillSeeker

Alfrescian
Loyal


Tiongs are LAZY and have no creativity. The other being..... all fake goods manufacturers are financed, nurtured, subsidized under the table by the Chinese Govt. because it helps them two ways - one, it gets them revenue big time and helps them in their grand scheme of dominating the market and wiping out the original branded manufacturers - leading them to ruins.

China sellers like this is insulting the intelligence of those who can read and write english and identify real from fakes. :biggrin: below is so obvious that it's an attempt to copy Samsung EVO in design and color but without the Samsung logo. I say let Tiongs scam their own kind. :biggrin:

luJPtvf.jpg



Original Samsung EVO below

mbmp128daapc-3.jpg




 

ByTheWay

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

By the way sometimes i buy cheap fakes so that u guys don't have to and then do reviews, then pass them on to rogue retailers at dirt cheap prices.
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
dont be stupid do u think theres any difference between a $5000 gucci bag and a $50 tiong made gucci?both cost $50 to make.do you think theres any difference between a $100 SD card versus a $20 tiong made SD card?both cost $20 to make and made by tiongs,do you think theres any difference between a $2000 apple laptop and a $700 tiong made laptop?both shits are made by foxconn!!!!!

china is helping u save tons and tons of money and u are so ungrateful?????nobody force u to buy tiong stuff!!!!go and buy apple shit and drink starbucks if u want!!!!!
 

Guardiola

Alfrescian
Loyal
dont be stupid do u think theres any difference between a $5000 gucci bag and a $50 tiong made gucci?both cost $50 to make.do you think theres any difference between a $100 SD card versus a $20 tiong made SD card?both cost $20 to make and made by tiongs,do you think theres any difference between a $2000 apple laptop and a $700 tiong made laptop?both shits are made by foxconn!!!!!

china is helping u save tons and tons of money and u are so ungrateful?????nobody force u to buy tiong stuff!!!!go and buy apple shit and drink starbucks if u want!!!!!

It fails, are not durable or fake :biggrin:

NG4MkV7.jpg
 
Last edited:

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
The Tiongs can steal it because US cybersecurity is lax, and nowhere close to the way it is exaggerated in the movies. It is shocking that external vendors can steal a ton of top secret intelligence from Uncle Sam and post it on the Internet. Perhaps the Americans should learn from Singapore a thing or two about cybersecurity. We don't allow such nonsense to happen here.
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The Tiongs can steal it because US cybersecurity is lax, and nowhere close to the way it is exaggerated in the movies. It is shocking that external vendors can steal a ton of top secret intelligence from Uncle Sam and post it on the Internet. Perhaps the Americans should learn from Singapore a thing or two about cybersecurity. We don't allow such nonsense to happen here.

Sinkapore helps the Ah Tiongs to steal US technology. That is a fact.
 

Sturridge

Alfrescian
Loyal
The Tiongs can steal it because US cybersecurity is lax, and nowhere close to the way it is exaggerated in the movies. It is shocking that external vendors can steal a ton of top secret intelligence from Uncle Sam and post it on the Internet. Perhaps the Americans should learn from Singapore a thing or two about cybersecurity. We don't allow such nonsense to happen here.

Your cyber security sucks too. I will dig out dirt when i am free and feel like it
 

Howitzer

Alfrescian
Loyal


Chinese national Su Bin admits hacking US defence firms to steal plans for fighter jets


Wealthy Vancouver businessman conspired with two people in China and translated stolen data, US prosecutors say

PUBLISHED : Thursday, 24 March, 2016, 2:31pm
UPDATED : Thursday, 24 March, 2016, 2:31pm
Agence France-Presse

zyHs7rV.jpg


A Chinese national pleaded guilty Wednesday to charges stemming from the hacking of trade secrets from US defence contractors, including plans for transport and fighter jets, officials said.

Su Bin, 50, had been charged in a 2014 indictment with hacking into the computer networks of Boeing and other contractors, as part of a scheme to steal plans for the F-22 and F-35 fighter jets and C-17 transport aircraft.

In a plea agreement filed in a California federal court, the wealthy resident of Vancouver, Canada, admitted to conspiring with two unnamed persons in China from October 2008 to March 2014 to gain unauthorised access to the computer networks of defence firms to obtain “sensitive military information and to export that information illegally from the United States to China,” the Justice Department said in a statement.

Ol6MEcz.jpg


The F-35 stealth fighter was one of the targets of Su Bin’s hacking efforts. Photo: AFP

Court documents did not indicate to whom Su was sending the plans, but the case highlighted growing concerns in the United States about Chinese hacking of American trade secrets, a topic which has been addressed by President Barack Obama and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping.

“Su Bin admitted to playing an important role in a conspiracy, originating in China, to illegally access sensitive military data, including data relating to military aircraft that are indispensable in keeping our military personnel safe,” Assistant Attorney General John Carlin said.

“This plea sends a strong message that stealing from the United States and our companies has a significant cost; we can and will find these criminals and bring them to justice.”

Su was initially arrested in Canada in July 2014 on a warrant based on a US request. He was sent to the United States in February 2016.

Su Bin, also known as Stephen Su and Stephen Subin, was a businessman in the aviation and aerospace fields.

According to prosecutors, Su would e-mail the co-conspirators pictures and other documents, with guidance regarding what persons, companies and technologies to target for hacking.

After the data was stolen, Su translated the information from English into Chinese.

Su and his co-conspirators each wrote, revised and emailed reports about the information and technology they had acquired “to the final beneficiaries of their hacking activities,” the Justice Department said.

Sentencing was set for July 13. Su faces a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a fine of US$250,000 or twice the gross gain from the offence.

Last September, Obama and Xi addressed the issue of cybertheft at their Washington meeting, and both leaders agreed it was unacceptable.

Obama said after the talks that “we’ve agreed that neither the US or the Chinese government will conduct or knowingly support cyber-enabled theft of intellectual property.”

Xi said “China strongly opposes and combats the theft of commercial secrets and other kinds of hacking attacks.”

Analysts have been cautious, warning that it remained to be seen if Beijing would live up to its agreement to crack down on hacking.

One report by a cybersecurity firm said hackers linked to the Chinese government kept up efforts to break into US computer networks shortly after the cybersecurity agreement.



 
Top