• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Are SG Public Transport Companies Losing $ or What?

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
In fact, they are making hundreds of millions of dollars. So why is the FAP giving them so much taxpayer funded kang tao to make them to work? Notice that when the MRT system first started, there were several LED time arrival signboards along the entire platform. Ever since that Msian woman became took over, they were taken down and replaced by just 1 miserable plasma TV showing the arrival time and you could hardly read it if you're some distance away from it. And lagi worse, it is being used to show noisy ads more than to show the arrival time. Who is real beneficiary of the public transport companies' insatiable greed?

Bus financing framework to be refined
By Hetty Musfirah | Posted: 07 March 2012 1721 hrs
display_image.php
Photos 1 of 1<INPUT id=btnPrev disabled value="<< Previous" src="/images/butt_previous.gif" width=18 height=15 type=image><INPUT id=bntPlay value="Play - Stop" src="/images/butt_stop.gif" width=19 height=15 type=image><INPUT id=btnNext disabled value=" Next >> " src="/images/butt_next.gif" width=18 height=15 type=image>

<TBODY>
</TBODY>
dotline_240.gif

Passengers boarding a bus. (Photo by: Hester Tan, channelnewsasia.com)

<TBODY>
</TBODY>
<!-- for social media sharing functions -->

<fb:like class=" fb_edge_widget_with_comment fb_iframe_widget" ref=".T1d0-rroHhE.like" action="recommend" layout="button_count" show_faces="false" font="arial" href="http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1187557/1/.html" width="120"><IFRAME style="BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; WIDTH: 130px; HEIGHT: 21px; BORDER-TOP: medium none; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none" id=f328c892661e28 class=fb_ltr title="Like this content on Facebook." src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?action=recommend&api_key=101910072318&channel_url=https%3A%2F%2Fs-static.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fconnect%2Fxd_proxy.php%3Fversion%3D3%23cb%3Df324e7f6243e252%26origin%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.channelnewsasia.com%252Ff325ca232091c02%26relation%3Dparent.parent%26transport%3Dpostmessage&extended_social_context=false&font=arial&href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.channelnewsasia.com%2Fstories%2Fsingaporelocalnews%2Fview%2F1187557%2F1%2F.html&layout=button_count&locale=en_US&node_type=1&ref=.T1d0-rroHhE.like&sdk=joey&show_faces=false&width=130" frameBorder=0 allowTransparency name=fa5283262f0f2c scrolling=no></IFRAME></fb:like>

<IFRAME style="WIDTH: 115px; HEIGHT: 20px" class="twitter-share-button twitter-count-horizontal" title="Twitter Tweet Button" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets/tweet_button.1331069346.html#_=1331131643590&count=horizontal&counturl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.channelnewsasia.com%2Fstories%2Fsingaporelocalnews%2Fview%2F1187557%2F1%2F.html&id=twitter-widget-0&lang=en&original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.channelnewsasia.com%2Fstories%2Fsingaporelocalnews%2Fview%2F1187557%2F1%2F.html&size=m&text=Bus%20financing%20framework%20to%20be%20refined%20-%20Channel%20NewsAsia%3A&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.channelnewsasia.com%2Fstories%2Fsingaporelocalnews%2Fview%2F1187557%2F1%2F.html%23.T1d0-nDA9f8.twitter&via=AddThis" frameBorder=0 allowTransparency scrolling=no></IFRAME>

inShare0





<TBODY> </TBODY>
<!-- END social media sharing functions -->
SINGAPORE: The bus financing framework will be refined, to help achieve greater level of parity with the rail financing framework.

Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew said in Parliament that there remains a marked difference between the support given to the bus and rail sectors.

For instance, the government funds the development and land costs for rail depots, and grants rail operators the right to generate and retain non-fare revenue such as advertising revenue in their MRT stations.

Such support is comparatively lacking in the bus sector.

So going forward, consistent with what is done for the rail industry, the government will bear the development and land costs for bus depots and bus parking infrastructure, and lease these to bus operators at a nominal fee.

=> $1?

This will also lower the entry barriers for new operators when contestability in the bus industry is introduced, as bus parking and depots are key infrastructure for running bus services.

Mr Lui said operators will also be allowed to retain a portion of the advertising revenue from bus shelters, which today is retained by the government.

He said this will provide the PTOs some help to cope with rising costs in the future.

- CNA/cc
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
not another of those forumers, explain already still do not understand.
already resort to explain with muppets, still cannot get it.

do i have to explain all over again from start? can't you people read up or use common sense? if you think the investors of these transport companies making a lot of money , giving out a lot of dividend, why dun you buy the shares and earn money, why complain about something you cannot understand. I tried to in the past, but it is a loss cause.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
not another of those forumers, explain already still do not understand.
already resort to explain with muppets, still cannot get it.

do i have to explain all over again from start? can't you people read up or use common sense? if you think the investors of these transport companies making a lot of money , giving out a lot of dividend, why dun you buy the shares and earn money, why complain about something you cannot understand. I tried to in the past, but it is a loss cause.

Because it is a matter of principle. Not everyone who invests likes to fiddle with gor pio.
And not everyone is as gian png as you, wanting to reward poor corporate behavior by purchasing its shares.
 
Z

Zombie

Guest
So going forward, consistent with what is done for the rail industry, the government will bear the development and land costs for bus depots and bus parking infrastructure, and lease these to bus operators at a nominal fee.

for consistency, why not make rail operators pay for the land costs... ie the govt pays for all the developments (infrastructure) but the transport companies (railway and bus) pay for the usage of those developments...

payment for the usage of land is consistent to all other biz in sg
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Because it is a matter of principle. Not everyone who invests likes to fiddle with gor pio.
And not everyone is as gian png as you, wanting to reward poor corporate behavior by purchasing its shares.

like putting money in bank, now citizens get a part of country wealth by investing in a transport company and get dividend like interests.

gov inject money to transport company so to improve public transport,what wrong with that, you do want good public transport?

you actually want our transport company to lose millions and share price drop to a few cents, who would want to invest in our transportation? it will not improve public transport.

you want it to be totally public right? well we are in 2012, there is WTO, free trade, opening of markets. Time will not turn back.
 
Top