Damn Nikon user now kick the balls of canon user. We being laughing at them stuck in DX for years then later stuck at puny 12 MP, now they come out and step on us canon user.
I joined the wrong boat, and it is time to switch.
You can see the noise in the "Geisha" image even though ISO is set to 100. MF is still a better option for portraiture.
Canon still ok...wait till u join Olympus like me...nothing new for like a million years...those burger now oni interested in making M43...4/3 user r left alone 2 die n rot...oni goot ting ish...no bleeding...
i thought you are nikon user? you are not going to get one ?
kingrant said:Impressive! But to see the real results of 36 Megapix, one got to see them on larger life size screens, not on PCs.
The Nikon is fine for action shots. My D3 is still going great and is fantastic when it comes to shooting my favourite sporting activities.
However, my camera of choice for studio work is the Phase One with a nice big sensor.
I'm skipping the D4. If I'm still around when the D5 comes by, I might bite.
The 36 Megapixel might mean very much unless the picture is blown up but full frame does make a big difference to the picture.
Canon still ok...wait till u join Olympus like me...nothing new for like a million years...those burger now oni interested in making M43...4/3 user r left alone 2 die n rot...oni goot ting ish...no bleeding...
singveld said:full frame myth is not correct, aps-c is perfectly capable to take great quality pictures. the problem for me, it turn 50mm lens into 85mm, 85mm is not wide enough for general use. take nex-7 , it better some old full frame camera.
Possible Canon 5DX spotted in wild alongside 1DX?
http://www.eoshd.com/content/6941/canon-5d-mark-iii-safari