- Joined
- Jan 23, 2020
- Messages
- 1,647
- Points
- 113
..."falsely accused" her of being a non-virgin; then to be FAIR, she should LEAD by EXAMPLE by SWEARING FIRST that if all her various accusations against them (e.g. of being "Cantonese" or "clones" or "Jeremy Quek", etc.) are FALSE, then SHE HERSELF will "DIE a VIOLENT death", right?
Both @ginfreely and her enemies/victims have been accusing each other of being various types of people; and even if we ignore the fact that she was the one who started falsely accusing some sammyboy.com members first back on "Sep 17, 2015" (over eight years ago!):
sammyboy.com/threads/boss-leongsam-can-verify-these-are-clones.216526
I think it should be very safe to say that even she will agree that she was the one who STARTED DEMANDING some members to SWEAR that they will "DIE a VIOLENT death", right?
She has sworn many times that she's a "virgin", but that's not enough because it's not fair, right?
For example, I've also sworn that I'm not "Jeremy Quek" (but I've only done it a few times, or maybe only twice, because I don't like to spam and I also don't have enough time and energy to spam); so may I also demand her to swear that I am "Jeremy Quek"?
If she's still not willing to swear that I am "Jeremy Quek", just like how she first refused to swear back on "May 2, 2022" (nearly two years ago) after I first swore that I'm not "Jeremy Quek":
sammyboy.com/posts/3601748
sammyboy.com/posts/3601763
then to be FAIR, she should also not demand me to swear that she's a non-virgin, right?
By the way, I have never clearly accused her of being a non-virgin (i.e. having lost 100% of her virginity due to full penetration of her vaginal canal by a man's erect penis), simply because I still don't have enough proof.
Some of her other enemies/victims have clearly accused her of being a non-virgin because of various reasons; and although that's not my style of counterattacking her, I have "liked" (or even "loved") some of their posts or "reacted" to them with "Haha", simply because they were quite amusing!
Anyway, I believe that most of the currently active members who have been active since before Sepetmeber 2015 (especially during 2016) should be well aware that @ginfreely started losing her credibility after she started the above thread (about asking @Leongsam to "verify these are clones"), followed by her frequent malicious trolling and, especially, spamming!
And as long as she continues being so stubbornly conceited/vain/arrogant/imperious/overbearing/domineering, i.e. refusing to humble herself to repent (and repentance includes atoning for her various offences, while refraining from committing the same old, and also new, offences), then this very bad habit (among other very bad habits) of hers (to which she is obviously addicted) will only worsen and it will become even harder for her to repent, just like how it is very difficult for cigarette/drug addicts to go:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_turkey
especially if they still have more than enough money to buy the cigarettes/drugs.
Usually, something very shocking needs to happen in real life, in order to force such addicts to go "cold turkey", such as a long hospitalization or prison sentence!
In @ginfreely's case, I think it's highly unlikely that she will ever end up in a prison cell (because she seems to be careful enough to refrain from committing any obvious crime in her real life), so the only other alternative that I can think of now is a long hospitalization, because of one of the following:
1. Physical illness
2. Mental/Psychological illness
3. Serious injury caused by an accident
4. Serious injury caused by at least one person physically attacking her
Otherwise, her evil spiritual presence is likely to continue plaguing this forum for at least the next ten years (assuming that this forum continues existing, of course) until she reaches her early/mid sixties (because I strongly suspect she's 53 or 54 years old this year)! 
Both @ginfreely and her enemies/victims have been accusing each other of being various types of people; and even if we ignore the fact that she was the one who started falsely accusing some sammyboy.com members first back on "Sep 17, 2015" (over eight years ago!):
sammyboy.com/threads/boss-leongsam-can-verify-these-are-clones.216526
I think it should be very safe to say that even she will agree that she was the one who STARTED DEMANDING some members to SWEAR that they will "DIE a VIOLENT death", right?
She has sworn many times that she's a "virgin", but that's not enough because it's not fair, right?
For example, I've also sworn that I'm not "Jeremy Quek" (but I've only done it a few times, or maybe only twice, because I don't like to spam and I also don't have enough time and energy to spam); so may I also demand her to swear that I am "Jeremy Quek"?
If she's still not willing to swear that I am "Jeremy Quek", just like how she first refused to swear back on "May 2, 2022" (nearly two years ago) after I first swore that I'm not "Jeremy Quek":
sammyboy.com/posts/3601748
sammyboy.com/posts/3601763
then to be FAIR, she should also not demand me to swear that she's a non-virgin, right?
By the way, I have never clearly accused her of being a non-virgin (i.e. having lost 100% of her virginity due to full penetration of her vaginal canal by a man's erect penis), simply because I still don't have enough proof.
Some of her other enemies/victims have clearly accused her of being a non-virgin because of various reasons; and although that's not my style of counterattacking her, I have "liked" (or even "loved") some of their posts or "reacted" to them with "Haha", simply because they were quite amusing!
Anyway, I believe that most of the currently active members who have been active since before Sepetmeber 2015 (especially during 2016) should be well aware that @ginfreely started losing her credibility after she started the above thread (about asking @Leongsam to "verify these are clones"), followed by her frequent malicious trolling and, especially, spamming!
And as long as she continues being so stubbornly conceited/vain/arrogant/imperious/overbearing/domineering, i.e. refusing to humble herself to repent (and repentance includes atoning for her various offences, while refraining from committing the same old, and also new, offences), then this very bad habit (among other very bad habits) of hers (to which she is obviously addicted) will only worsen and it will become even harder for her to repent, just like how it is very difficult for cigarette/drug addicts to go:
wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_turkey
especially if they still have more than enough money to buy the cigarettes/drugs.
Usually, something very shocking needs to happen in real life, in order to force such addicts to go "cold turkey", such as a long hospitalization or prison sentence!
In @ginfreely's case, I think it's highly unlikely that she will ever end up in a prison cell (because she seems to be careful enough to refrain from committing any obvious crime in her real life), so the only other alternative that I can think of now is a long hospitalization, because of one of the following:
1. Physical illness
2. Mental/Psychological illness
3. Serious injury caused by an accident
4. Serious injury caused by at least one person physically attacking her
Otherwise, her evil spiritual presence is likely to continue plaguing this forum for at least the next ten years (assuming that this forum continues existing, of course) until she reaches her early/mid sixties (because I strongly suspect she's 53 or 54 years old this year)!
Last edited:
