• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Serious Dear @jw5, are my eyes deceiving me, or have you finally ATTACKED ME in a very CLEAR/OBVIOUS way for the very FIRST time?

empathizerofeatshitndie

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jan 23, 2020
Messages
1,647
Points
113
Or was the following post of yours (in one of my threads) meant for another member:
sammyboy.com/posts/3676730
Dear @glockman, many very belated thanks for loving the above post of mine roughly four months ago!
bow-gif.40441
:inlove:
And dear @bart12, many very belated thanks to you too for liking it!
bow-gif.40441
:thumbsup:
And dear @sweetiepie and @Cottonmouth, many very belated thanks to both of you too for "reacting" to it with "Haha"!
bow-gif.40441
:laugh: :roflmao: :tongue:
Jeremy Quek

Why are you thanking yourself? Are you a moron? :roflmao:

View attachment 159216
But if you sincerely meant to reply to me, then here's my reply to you:

1. Are you really 100% sure (i.e. with ZERO doubt) that my real-life identity is indeed the "Jeremy Quek" (including that photo) that you mentioned in your post? If you're not 100% sure, please let me know, so that I understand that you're only suspecting me; because right now, my understanding is that you are really 100% sure! :eek:

2. Once again, I feel the need to repeat what I said (roughly four months ago) in the above same thread (in which you attacked me for the first time):
sammyboy.com/posts/3601763
I swear that if my real-life identity is the "Jeremy Quek" that @ginfreely keeps calling me, I will die a violent death!
:cool:

Now let's see whether @ginfreely will dare to swear that if we are really not monikers that are used by the same man that she keeps calling "Jeremy Quek", then she will die a violent death!
:wink:

3. You asked me, "Why are you thanking yourself?" and my reply is that I'm not thanking myself, simply because the following monikers are really NOT mine:
@glockman
@bart12
@sweetiepie
@Cottonmouth

4. You then asked me, "Are you a moron?" and my reply is a question for you, i.e. "Do you think I'm a moron?" :o-o:

5. Unlike the fact that there are more than enough proofs that @ginfreely's real-life identity is indeed "Gan (颜) Siok Bin (淑敏)":
facebook.com/siokbin.gan
parliament.gov.sg/sconlinefalsehoods
parliament.gov.sg/docs/default-source/sconlinefalsehoods/written-representation-3.pdf
sammyboy.com/posts/3073876
who is obviously a Chinese Sinkie woman, who I strongly suspect was born in 1970/71 and who is, therefore, 51/52 years old this year, according to:
sammyboy.com/posts/2699016
And people who never heard people calling someone a slut until age 38
and:
sammyboy.com/posts/2571169
KT Latha's unprofessional comments are : "someone is acting like a slut today"

Thus happened in early 2009 in a company excursion to Spore flyer.
(which I believe to be true); and who owns one small Sinkie condo unit in:
propertyguru.com.sg/project/the-mayfair-176
according to:
sammyboy.com/posts/3675010
and who also owns at least one semi-detached house in "Nusa Duta" in JB, according to:
sammyboy.com/posts/2837407
you have still not provided any proof that "Jeremy Quek" is the real-life identity of any sammyboy.com member; nor have you proven that all those monikers that you have accused to be "Jeremy Quek" (since last year, 2021) are indeed being used by one man, right? If you have posted those proofs in the past, I don't remember seeing them, so please post them again or post the links to those posts, please! :wink:

I will never call you a "moron", especially since I discovered (roughly two years ago) that you have "a first class honours and a master's degree":
sammyboy.com/posts/3211411
but I dare say that anyone else who also has "a first class honours and a master's degree" will probably agree with me that you have ZERO credibility whenever you accuse any sammyboy.com member of being "Jeremy Quek" without proof.

6. Finally, I feel the need to say that you made a VERY BAD/BIG mistake when you started to strongly and steadfastly support @ginfreely in June/July 2021 (last year), just because you wanted to use her as an ALLY against your enemies, "Mark Yeo" and "Jeremy Quek"! :rolleyes:

In my humble but strong opinion, you would have been better off attacking all those monikers in threads that were not related to @ginfreely and also attacking them in a way that did not show that you were supporting her!

Unfortunately, you CHOSE to manipulate her into supporting you against "Mark Yeo" and "Jeremy Quek" by simply supporting her against @Cottonmouth, @sweetiepie, @glockman and a few others, followed by insisting that they are all monikers used by either "Mark Yeo" or "Jeremy Quek"; and because she's so desperate for someone to support her (in order to feed her vanity), it's easy to manipulate her!

Most importantly, you should be well aware that she has offended many other members since late 2015 (nearly seven years ago) and that by strongly and steadfastly supporting her since last year, your credibility (in the eyes of those members) would have nose-dived by now, right?

Therefore, I strongly believe this means that you decided to sacrifice your credibility, in order to make one last gamble to "defeat" those two real-life enemies of yours (which, ironically, you still do not know in your own real life) by supporting @ginfreely and hoping that she really attacks them in her own real life one day or reports them to the police! :eek:
That is probably the main reason for the following replies by you to her last year (in my thread):
sammyboy.com/posts/3409335
If you knew the identity of your main harrasser, what would you do? Go to his facebook and scold him? :unsure:
and get pofma?
Then what will you do? Hire thugs to go after him? :unsure::biggrin:
And in my humble opinion, this should prove how malicious you have become! :thumbsdown:

Ironically, @ginfreely has still not posted the names of "Mark Yeo" and/or "Jeremy Quek" on her Facebook page (i.e. using her real-life name) because she's still sensible enough to be aware that her only "proof" is that an anonymous moniker (i.e. you, @jw5) on an online forum simply told her (without proof) that they are the ones who have been attacking her!

Also, unlike during 2020 when she used to post the names of some of those sammyboy.com monikers in her Twitter posts, she has not done it again (not even her own moniker, @ginfreely) in her Facebook posts since she started posting on Facebook last year (2021); so I'm strongly suspecting that her Twitter experience taught her this lesson! :wink:
 

Attachments

  • 49485395-A5BB-4927-81AC-075993B4465E.jpeg
    49485395-A5BB-4927-81AC-075993B4465E.jpeg
    182.5 KB · Views: 135
Last edited:
Also, unlike during 2020 when she used to post the names of some of those sammyboy.com monikers in her Twitter posts, she has not done it again (not even her own moniker, @ginfreely) in her Facebook posts since she started posting on Facebook last year (2021); so I'm strongly suspecting that her Twitter experience taught her this lesson!
Sorry. Can I ask what kind of lesson do you think gansiokbin Twitter experience had taught her ?
:geek::sick:
 
jw5 and ginfreely is boyfriend and girlfriend liao.
dog man woman
she needs a lover and she found one
 
Ironically, @ginfreely has still not posted the names of "Mark Yeo" and/or "Jeremy Quek" on her Facebook page (i.e. using her real-life name) because she's still sensible enough to be aware that her only "proof" is that an anonymous moniker (i.e. you, @jw5) on an online forum simply told her (without proof) that they are the ones who have been attacking her!
Also were you thinking along the line that partly gansiokbin worried about being potentially sue by the real life MAY and JQ hence she dare not mentioned about their names in her fb ? :eek: :geek:
 
Sorry. Can I ask what kind of lesson do you think gansiokbin Twitter experience had taught her ?
:geek::sick:
@empathizerofeatshitndie
Is your suspicion anything related to the sudden removal of the account as in
https://www.sammyboy.com/threads/br...account-has-been-leemoved.295752/post-3272852

Could it be that gansiokbin was warned by spf for reposting all those swollen labias pictures ? :eek::sneaky:
Dear @hollowman, many thanks for gracing another humble thread of mine!
bow-gif.40441
:inlove:
I believe her Twitter experience taught her at least two things:

1. Claiming that she is the user of an anonymous "FEMALE" moniker that has been "sexually harassed" by anonymous "MALE" monikers in an online forum can never be good enough to prove that any real-life person has truly committed the crime of sexually harassing her.

2. I believe she did not voluntarily delete her Twitter account because I believe that either the Sinkie police complained to Twitter, followed by Twitter deleting/suspending her account; or she finally met some Sinkie police officers in person, who warned her to stop harassing the Sinkie police via Twitter and who also told her to delete some/many of her posts, so that might have motivated her to totally give up on Twitter, which resulted in her simply deleting her entire account, rather than going through the trouble of deleting many of her posts.
 
Last edited:
Dear @hollowman, many thanks for gracing another humble thread of mine!
bow-gif.40441
:inlove:
I believe her Twitter experience taught her at least two things:

1. Claiming that she is the user of an anonymous "FEMALE" moniker that has been "sexually harassed" by anonymous "MALE" monikers in an online forum can never be good enough to prove that any real-life person has truly committed the crime of sexually harassing her.

2. I believe she did not voluntarily delete her Twitter account because I believe that either the Sinkie police complained to Twitter, followed by Twitter deleting/suspending her account; or she finally met some Sinkie police officers in person, who warned her to stop harassing the Sinkie police via Twitter and who also told her to delete some/many of her posts, so that might have motivated her to totally give up on Twitter, which resulted in her simply deleting her entire account, rather than going through the trouble of deleting many of her posts.
Make complete sense :thumbsup::whistling:
 
Dear @hollowman, many thanks for gracing another humble thread of mine!
bow-gif.40441
:inlove:
I believe her Twitter experience taught her at least two things:

1. Claiming that she is the user of an anonymous "FEMALE" moniker that has been "sexually harassed" by anonymous "MALE" monikers in an online forum can never be good enough to prove that any real-life person has truly committed the crime of sexually harassing her.

2. I believe she did not voluntarily delete her Twitter account because I believe that either the Sinkie police complained to Twitter, followed by Twitter deleting/suspending her account; or she finally met some Sinkie police officers in person, who warned her to stop harassing the Sinkie police via Twitter and who also told her to delete some/many of her posts, so that might have motivated her to totally give up on Twitter, which resulted in her simply deleting her entire account, rather than going through the trouble of deleting many of her posts.
@ginfreely did you learnt these lessons?
Or you 死性不改。:sneaky:
 
Back
Top