Your reply to @ginfreely reminds me of a similar post of mine over a month ago in another thread:
sammyboy.com/posts/2724686
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Foreigner assaulters in Singapore
- Thread starter ginfreely
- Start date
sammyboy.com/posts/2724686
Dude I almost spat out my buk kut tell when I saw this.Yes, according to:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esophageal_cancer#Adenocarcinoma
"The long-term erosive effects of acid reflux (an extremely common condition, also known as gastroesophageal reflux disease or GERD) have been strongly linked to this type of cancer. Longstanding GERD can induce a change of cell type in the lower portion of the esophagus in response to erosion of its squamous lining. This phenomenon, known as Barrett's esophagus, seems to appear about 20 years later in women than in men, maybe due to hormonal factors. Having symptomatic GERD or bile reflux makes Barrett's esophagus more likely, which in turn raises the risk of further changes that can ultimately lead to adenocarcinoma.
Being obese or overweight both appear to be associated with increased risk. The association with obesity seems to be the strongest of any type of obesity-related cancer, though the reasons for this remain unclear. Abdominal obesity seems to be of particular relevance, given the closeness of its association with this type of cancer, as well as with both GERD and Barrett's esophagus."
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Esophageal_cancer-2626-02.jpg
("日本語: 下部食道癌。81歳 女性。印鑑細胞癌 いわゆるバレット食道癌
English: Esophageal cancer(lower part) ; Barrettʼs cancer
81y.o. Female. Japanese. short-segment-BE. She died a month later.")
If a sinkie dared to kick a popo in the abdomen,he would be tasered and batoned,pile drived and curbstomped within an inch of his life before being left for dead and crack sprinkled on his body as evidence.it will be an open and shut case,nigga died of drug overdose and tripped down the stairs and broke his neck.
See everyone? Proven conman talking rubbish making all kinds of WRONG assumptions. Do you know me? How do you assume since twenties I eat a lot of meat or drink a lot of sugar drinks? Excuse me I hardly take soft drinks since young. And I drink coffee or tea without sugar. And I consciously avoided preserved stuff and bbqs that will involve eating carcinogenic chao tar meat. I didn’t even want to eat McDonald’s then as I considered it junk food with junk meat, hey that was in 1990s way advanced than most people that only started such awakening in recent years. The only sugary stuff I eat is cheesecake and that is not often.Since your "early twenties" until now, are meat, which contains:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans_fatty_acids#Health_risks
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans_fatty_acids#Coronary_artery_disease
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans_fatty_acids#Other_health_risks
and sugary food:
healthline.com/nutrition/9-reasons-to-avoid-sugar
part of your usual diet?
And I dare say that sugar is certainly one of the main activators of "cancer genes" to produce cancer cells or to cause small, natural and benign cancer cells to grow bigger and become malignant:
Sugar Doesn't Just Feed Cancer, It Causes Cancer - Cancer Defeated Newsletter #77
cancerdefeated.com/newsletters/Sugar-feeds-cancer-and-causes-cancer.html
There's something different about fructose. I'm going to briefly explain what it is. If you have a taste for science and you'd like to know the details, check out a 90-minute Youtube lecture by an M.D. named Robert Lustig, Professor of Pediatrics at the University of California, San Francisco.
Dr. Lustig is an expert on child obesity and a leading critic of sugar — both table sugar and HFCS — because both these sugars basically come down to fructose. He's the source of most of what was in the New York Times Magazine article and most of what I'm telling you here.
He didn't conduct the scientific studies himself, but he's a very effective speaker and he passionately believes sugar is a poison. He actually uses the word "poison" 13 times in his lecture. You can quickly find his talk by Googling "Sugar: The Bitter Truth".
youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM
Sugar: The Bitter Truth - UCTV - University of California Television
http://www.uctv.tv/shows/Sugar-The-Bitter-Truth-16717
("Robert H. Lustig, MD, UCSF Professor of Pediatrics in the Division of Endocrinology, explores the damage caused by sugary foods. He argues that fructose (too much) and fiber (not enough) appear to be cornerstones of the obesity epidemic through their effects on insulin. Recorded on 05/26/2009.")
The two-minute explanation of how fructose messes you up
The quick summary is that, unlike glucose, fructose has to be metabolized in the liver by way of a very complex and inefficient process. Your digestive system quickly breaks down a potato or a grain of rice into glucose, the "good" sugar. The glucose then passes through your intestinal wall into your bloodstream, and your cells are able to take it up and "eat it" with no problem.
Not so with fructose. Your liver has to convert fructose into glucose, the food your cells can take up. It's about like trying to turn a bowl of fish soup into a fish. The resulting process is so complex it puts a great strain on the liver. And here's the thing researchers say is key: 30 percent of the fructose is converted into fat and stays in your liver.
The growing load of fat in your liver causes disastrous damage over a period of many years. It appears to be the main cause of "metabolic syndrome" or "insulin resistance syndrome" — the breakdown in your insulin system that leads to heart disease, diabetes, hypertension — and cancer.
Glucose good (sort of), fructose bad (definitely)
If you eat "good" glucose-generating carbs, only one calorie out of five is stored in the liver. What's more, it's stored in a harmless form called glycogen. Your liver can store any amount of glycogen without getting sick.
When you eat fructose, three calories out of five are stored in the liver — three times as many as when you eat glucose. And the fructose calories are stored in the liver as a highly toxic fat.
The researchers in the field believe this accumulation of toxic fat in the liver is THE cause of the chronic degenerative diseases such as cancer and heart disease.
Fructose is a dietary catastrophe
According to Dr. Lustig, eating a high-fructose diet is effectively like eating a high-fat diet. That means you can think you're following a so-called low-fat diet when you really aren't at all. For more than 30 years, conventional medicine has told us to cut way back on fats for a healthy heart. Eat all the carbs you want, they've told us, eat all the pasta you want, but give up fats, especially saturated fats like those found in beef or butter or even guacamole.
In his lecture, Dr. Lustig provides persuasive evidence that this advice is all nonsense. You can eat a very low fat diet, but if you eat a lot of sugar — and Americans eat MASSIVE amounts of it — you'll still get fat. You'll still have an unhealthy heart and unhealthy arteries, you'll have hypertension, and very likely you'll get diabetes or cancer.
You can eat and eat and still feel hungry
Fructose has another oddity: You can eat a huge amount of calories and still feel hungry. Dr. Lustig says a kid can drink a Coke containing 200 calories and still go into McDonald's raving hungry and eat a heaping plate of food. The reason is that fructose does not suppress ghrelin, the "hunger hormone."
When you're hungry, your stomach and pancreas secrete ghrelin, and this hormone signals your brain that you need to eat. You feel hungry. Once you've eaten, ghrelin production falls off and you don't feel hungry anymore. Unless you've eaten fructose.
Ghrelin levels don't go down after consuming fructose, according to Dr. Lustig. You still feel hungry even though you've taken on board a huge dose of calories.
It gets worse. Most food stimulates the body to produce leptin, a chemical that signals the brain you've had something to eat. According to Dr. Lustig, this response fails to occur if the food is high in fructose. Your brain never gets the message you're full.
Fructose literally changes the way your brain perceives what you've eaten. You don't know whether you're hungry or not, you don't know whether you've eaten or not. Sometimes a new-agey alternative doctor will tell a sick person, "You're out of touch with your body." I"ll say!
Now you know why you're sick. . .
Fructose is a likely answer if not THE answer. There are other factors involved — certainly toxic chemicals and heavy metals, in the case of cancer. But fructose looks more and more like a major explanation for our problems. I'm convinced we'd see a rapid increase in health and well-being in our society if every gram of sugar disappeared tomorrow, for good.
Instead, we eat five times the amount of fructose people ate a hundred years ago. And most of their fructose calories were from fruit. Most of ours are from the pure junk, like mainlining heroin.
Here's a thought form the New York Times article: "One of the diseases that increases in incidence with obesity, diabetes and metabolic syndrome is cancer. . .The connection between obesity, diabetes and cancer was first reported in 2004 in large population studies by researchers from the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer. It is not controversial." (We wrote about the diabetes-cancer connection in issue #35.)
The Times also quotes Craig Thompson, President of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York. While the article does the usual song and dance that we need more studies (and it's true; we do), Dr. Thompson dropped this bombshell:
"I have eliminated refined sugar from my diet and eat as little as I possibly can, because I believe that ultimately it's something I can do to decrease my risk of cancer."
This comes from the very heart of America's cancer establishment. If the world's leading enemies of alternative medicine are saying this. . .well, you do the math.
Hey conman do you know what is called assault? It is called “voluntarily causing hurt” by the police. So if people like kt latha want to insult me by saying shit lies of “someone is acting like a slut today” and worse block me at the door exit, then be prepared for the consequences. I should have slapped her instead of just giving her a slight nudge for blocking me. Anyway it’s called provoked and self Defence not assault.
Impressive sleuth work as always!
As usual con job is praised by fellow con man as impressive sleuth work when it is fraudulent misleading opinion.
See everyone? How disgusting Malaysian dogs can twist a simple sentence of “see everyone “ to anything that fit that agenda to call me self entitled when they are the self entitled Malaysian bastards that think they can insult people slut whore mistress etc evil and I have no right to insult them back or say “see everyone?” for highlighting.
Knnbccb Malaysian dog your slutty mother wife daughters vagina look like that.
Tak Nang is Teochew. But Kua is Hokkien."See everyone" is so hokkien dialect-kie way of speaking.
Tak Nang Kua... Lol
Hokkien will say : Kua Tio Bo ?
And Hokkien will never be Hokkien without ending with: KNNCCB !
Interesting how it's "imported" into spoken English...
Interesting how it's "imported" into spoken English...
Your need to score A1 in English to understand. Apparently, your English is not good enough.
That's why lor...Now collect card boards and beer cans in Little India... Life is tough after they restrict alcohol there...Your need to score A1 in English to understand. Apparently, your English is not good enough.
I asked you a simple question; is that the same as making an "assumption"?
You scored "A1" for O-Level English and even English Literature, right?
That's good, but is that good enough?
By the way, I think you meant to say:
collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/conscientiously
("involving or taking great care; painstaking; diligent")
right?
Last edited:
Not only have you not proven that she was talking about you, it is also not possible to prove it, right?
Do you have any witnesses?
Otherwise, she can also say that you were blocking her way, right?
Did she touch you at all?
Last edited:
Once again, have you apologized for starting (nearly three years ago!) this ongoing online war with your many truly innocent sammyboy.com enemies by assuming that we are either your real-life enemies (i.e. people that you've actually met in your real life) or clones of those particular sammyboy.com members who slandered you first in the JB sub-forum:
sammyboy.com/threads/boss-leongsam-can-verify-these-are-clones.216526
Furthermore, even your "proofs" that we are "clones" is also ridiculous because, once again:
sammyboy.com/posts/2729568
KNN see everyone translate to hokkien have to use KNN so is KNN ni lang kua KNN"See everyone" is so hokkien dialect-kie way of speaking.
Tak Nang Kua... Lol
Agree...See Everyone is Ni Lang Kua...
Your need to score A1 in English to understand. Apparently, your English is not good enough.
Hey you got read to kill a mockingbird? Even the uneducated black maid knows that one can speak differently in different environment. This is shit forum not office not school ok?
Similar threads
