Pritam Singh and Andrew Loh face-off online

[BuiKia]

Why ah neh all like that. Like to beat around the bush when they talk.

 

[ChaoPappyPoodle]

What Pritam is saying is that Andrew is a PAP mole lah...just say directly lah.

Wah! You cannot make this kind of statement online leh. You can get into trouble for defamation. If WP is really PAP buddy then you can sure that your ass can be fired easily even if you are a small time PAPzi dog. WP is bigger dog than small time PAPzi internet dog.

 

[Kinana]

Why ah neh all like that. Like to beat around the bush when they talk.

Looked exactly like an exchange between an ah neh n a Chinese. Ah neh snake n Chinese try to nail him.
This thing sounds real stupid when it involves an MP doesn't it?

 

[ChaoPappyPoodle]

Looked exactly like an exchange between an ah neh n a Chinese. Ah neh snake n Chinese try to nail him.
This thing sounds real stupid when it involves an MP doesn't it?

It only sounds stupid because you have made a number of racist remarks in your post!

 

[BuiKia]

Okay, then maybe I should say, "Pritam seems to insinuate that Andrew has closer links to the PAP than it appears to be." Like that will kenna sued?

Fuck lah! That is exactly what Pritam trying to say. I'm not indian so dunno how to beat around the bush. Unless it is the bush near a pussy.

Wah! You cannot make this kind of statement online leh. You can get into trouble for defamation. If WP is really PAP buddy then you can sure that your ass can be fired easily even if you are a small time PAPzi dog. WP is bigger dog than small time PAPzi internet dog.

 

[Huat-Ah]

It seems the other way around sir. Pritam doesn't even know what he is taking about and got stuck when asked to clarify what he spewed on his FB.
He then cry foul and make wild alledgations. What shameful behavior for an MP.

Well if you think you are better than him, SHOW US ...

 

[Kinana]

Okay, then maybe I should say, "Pritam seems to insinuate that Andrew has closer links to the PAP than it appears to be." Like that will kenna sued?

Fuck lah! That is exactly what Pritam trying to say. I'm not indian so dunno how to beat around the bush. Unless it is the bush near a pussy.

N now we see these opposition worshipers defending this snake

 

[tanwahp]

Havin tea with the PM had made Andrew all cloudy in his head..

He seems starstruck by the presence of the PM.. Pinky had successfully worked his Ah Kua magic on Andrew.. Somethin special in the Tea that Andrew had drank in the Istana the other day..

I'm with Pritam on this matter..

Anyone who has followed the literature of Andrew Loh will know he is not a PAP or opposition supporter. However he is not neutral either. I think he is more seasonal than neutral. During the time, when a party does something fantastic, he will support that party for a few weeks.

 

[tanwahp]

Pritam Singh,
Dear George Wong: Fortunately I have no powers to "attack" anyone, and thank God for that. Unfortunately, Andrew Loh has a particular penchant for going to after the WP. If you trace his online behaviour, the pattern is painfully apparent - his questions and modus operandi seek to "expose" the WP as an incapable party. There is nothing wrong with such an opinion per se. Absolutely not. But when you repeatedly do it - that conduct borders on pathalogical. As a self-annointed citizen journalist, that is not the normal behaviour of a person interested in civil discourse. What bad blood he has with WP I have no clue. For the record, I don't disagree with his view that he expects the WP to do more - every Singaporean has a right to feel that way. And Raymond Anthony Fernando may well be right that Andrew is deeply interested about "minority" issues. And kudos to Andrew for that. But I think we need to be honest about Andrew's deeper frustrations with the WP as does Andrew. Maybe he can tell us why he left the WP after to two years? What really happened? Is it true that he was in the YPAP originally? Who is funding publichouse.sg? Molly Meek's thoughtful piece ought to engage us in critical self-reflection. We are mature enough for that.
8 hours ago · Edited · Like · 11

I think Pritam overdid this.

 

[hurley]

Joshua Chiang and some former TOC members are enjoying the face-off

 

[zeddy]

Looked exactly like an exchange between an ah neh n a Chinese. Ah neh snake n Chinese try to nail him.
This thing sounds real stupid when it involves an MP doesn't it?

I have personally met, and had a chat with Pritam last year.. He even replied to my email swiftly.. He's a nice chap.. I may have a distaste towards the Foreign Pundeks from India but I'll not call Pritam a snake.. There're many more poisonous snakes in the PAP camp like Shanmugam, Puthucheery.. These PAP snakes are more dangerous..

 

[hurley]

TOC is turning everything into a circus

 

[Extremist]

http://wp.sg/2012/09/office-bearers-of-the-workers-party-for-the-term-of-2012-to-2014/


Pritam Singh got demoted? Jane Leong has replaced Pritam Singh as the Vice-Chair of The Workers' Party's Media Team

 

[Kinana]

I have personally met, and had a chat with Pritam last year.. He even replied to my email swiftly.. He's a nice chap.. I may have a distaste towards the Foreign Pundeks from India but I'll not call Pritam a snake.. There're many more poisonous snakes in the PAP camp like Shanmugam, Puthucheery.. These PAP snakes are more dangerous..

Just because he reply your mail you go gaga already.
It's just PR bro, says nothing about the intelligence

 

[zeddy]

Just because he reply your mail you go gaga already.
It's just PR bro, says nothing about the intelligence

Its not because of the email lah you Kotek..

Many of my friends staying in his constituency said before that Pritam is a good MP, takes good care of the needs of his residents, friendly, and approachable..

If you want to talk about Public Relations, no one can beat the PAP in terms of wayang..

Very nice to you before a GE, then they screw you as usual after the GE.. I'm sure by now you're used to the screwing in the arse and completely numb by the pain..

 

[Fook Seng]

I think Pritam overdid this.

If he doesn't say it as it? Who will say it? You? This Andrew guy had been insinuating at every opportunity and so are some forummers here.

 

[tanwahp]

If he doesn't say it as it? Who will say it? You? This Andrew guy had been insinuating at every opportunity and so are some forummers here.

I shared in another post that this AL guy is seasonal. He has been about anti-SDP once and pro-WP twice, anti-WP four times and in two seasons pro-SDP, at one time pro-PAP. This is the season he is pro-SDP, a bit pro-PAP and anti-WP.

In that debate, however, AL merely posed an innocent question. PS overreacted. In life, some people make the mistake PS does of having preconceived notion of a person or his motives and therefore overreact. You can get trapped or fall into quarrel easily.

AL's problem is mistaking seasonal for neutral. However PS is bordering on a gaffeprone Goh Meng Seng. What does he mean by casting doubts on a website's funding.

 

[ChaoPappyPoodle]

I shared in another post that this AL guy is seasonal. He has been about anti-SDP once and pro-WP twice, anti-WP four times and in two seasons pro-SDP, at one time pro-PAP. This is the season he is pro-SDP, a bit pro-PAP and anti-WP.

In that debate, however, AL merely posed an innocent question. PS overreacted. In life, some people make the mistake PS does of having preconceived notion of a person or his motives and therefore overreact. You can get trapped or fall into quarrel easily.

AL's problem is mistaking seasonal for neutral. However PS is bordering on a gaffeprone Goh Meng Seng. What does he mean by casting doubts on a website's funding.

He has always been proPAP. His coverage of Chan Chun Sing was farcical. Not one difficult question was asked and he even defended CSS feverishly online. You can try to go to his site and ask questions about CSS and see how far you get. His stance is clear. He is exceptionally rude towards opposition MPs and candidates but he automatically knows where his bread or maybe his buttocks get buttered. It is good to stay away from such people for they are damned to bring you misery. Maybe he needs schizo meds.

 

[tanwahp]

He has always been proPAP. His coverage of Chan Chun Sing was farcical. Not one difficult question was asked and he even defended CSS feverishly online. You can try to go to his site and ask questions about CSS and see how far you get. His stance is clear. He is exceptionally rude towards opposition MPs and candidates but he automatically knows where his bread or maybe his buttocks get buttered. It is good to stay away from such people for they are damned to bring you misery. Maybe he needs schizo meds.

Even if you are right that AL is PAP at heart, my point is this should not come to play when debating a person. Same for me when I debated GMS. I knew he was anti-WP but I debated objectively as if he was neutral and let him unravel that anti-WP streak himself. PS is an MP that many people are watching.

 

[Fook Seng]

Even if you are right that AL is PAP at heart, my point is this should not come to play when debating a person. Same for me when I debated GMS. I knew he was anti-WP but I debated objectively as if he was neutral and let him unravel that anti-WP streak himself. PS is an MP that many people are watching.

What's wrong with putting down someone who is anti-you much of the time? You want to play real gentleman? Then you should not be in politics.