• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

UK’s Daily Mail adopts sharia, censors image of Muhammed

duluxe

Alfrescian
Loyal
Daily-Mail-censors-Muhammad-image-768x853.jpg


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ing-mug-featuring-image-Prophet-Muhammad.html

The Daily Mail reported yesterday that another teacher has been suspended for showing an image of Mohammed. This image hadn’t been shown in a classroom setting for educational purposes, however, but was featured on his coffee mug from which he was drinking outside the staffroom; indeed, he was reportedly “photographed carrying the item in the playground at Colchester Royal Grammar School in Essex”. And it wasn’t some venerable 15th-century Shia portrayal of Mohammed encountering the angel of half-fire and half-snow, but rather a ink-line cartoon of him standing next to Jesus saying, ‘Hey’, to which Mohammed responds, ‘How ya doin’?”

Blasphemy.

The satirical cartoon is from ‘Jesus and Mo‘, which was created by Mohammed Jones (pseudonym [..for fear of death]) in 2005. It is either perceptive, astute and funny, or offensive, blasphemous and Islamophobic, depending on whether you’re slightly sensitive and easily fomented into a state of religious fury or not; and whether you believe Allah feels threatened by an ink-line cartoon and needs shielding from the violation or not….

If the Daily Mail falls for censoring images of Mohammed, then more newspapers will censor them, and more television channels and other media will censor them, and then more schools will censor them, and then universities will censor them, and then we will all be caught by the impending ‘Online Safety Bill‘ so Facebook and Twitter and YouTube will censor them, and before we know where we are the whole United Kingdom is subject to a very narrow hadithic understanding of sharia for fear of civil disorder, or even death, and so everyone conforms, or is forced to conform, on pain of fine or imprisonment….
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
I think its just to be respectful. Nothing wrong with that.

Banning of muhammad's images is a recent practice, not an islamic practice historically. There have been many ancient manuscripts with muhammad's image painted on them. The whites can't figure out which recent islamic practice to respect.

There are many more such paintings in wikipedia search.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depictions_of_Muhammad

Journey of the Prophet Muhammad in the Majmac al-tawarikh (Compendium of Histories), c. 1425; Timurid. Herat, Afghanistan.

1648995207975.png



Muhammad removes a dragon from the Kaaba. From the Siyer-i Nebi.

1648995252884.png



Muhammad's Call to Prophecy and the First Revelation; in the Majmac al-tawarikh (Compendium of Histories), c. 1425; Timurid, Herat, Afghanistan

1648995296159.png



Ali beheading Nadr ibn al-Harith in the presence of Muhammad and his companions. From the Siyer-i Nebi.

1648995378771.png
 
Last edited:
Top