• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Steal S$500k, bail only $150k. Wealth and connections have their privileges under Sin

bic_cherry

Alfrescian
Loyal
Steal S$500k, bail only $150k. Wealth and connections have their privileges under Singapore law?

Is $150k bail adequate in the Yang Yin case???!!!

Ex-guide granted bail but faces probe into $500k transfer
Straits Times: Date: 07 Nov 2014
Author: Carolyn Khew
YANG Yin looked a relieved man after managing to secure bail of $150,000 yesterday despite the prosecution's insistence that he was a flight risk. But his legal battles are far from over as it emerged that the authorities are investigating a suspicious transfer of $500,000 from the account of 87-year-old widow Chung Khin Chun to his father in China.
It is not clear what the transfer was for. Yang, 40, a tour guide from China, is involved in a legal tussle for control over the widow's wealth, and has been accused of manipulating her.
He also faces 331 criminal charges for falsifying about $450,000 worth of receipts that were supposedly paid to his company, Young Music and Dance Studio, mostly for music lessons.
It was through this firm that he received an employment pass and then permanent residency.
These had allowed him to live with Madam Chung in her $30 million bungalow in Gerald Crescent since 2009.
He had been in remand since Oct 31, but District Judge Eddy Tham said that Yang could not be denied bail just because he is a foreigner with "no roots" here. That would mean all foreigners cannot get bail, he explained.
The judge also dismissed Deputy Chief Prosecutor Tan Ken Hwee's argument that the punishment Yang faces, if found guilty, are of such a severe extent that it would push him into absconding. Typically, those guilty of submitting false documents get a few months in jail, he said.
But even after the judge allowed bail, the prosecutor and Yang's lawyer, Mr Wee Pan Lee, continued to spar over how much it should be.
Mr Tan urged the court to put it at $800,000 with four sureties. He pointed out a recent case in which $600,000 bail and the withholding of a passport were not enough to prevent the accused, facing similar charges, from running away. It is understood that a high bail amount is not unusual for cases involving foreigners.
The prosecutor also brought up the $500,000, arguing that the money meant Yang had the means to post higher bail. Mr Wee, however, said there is no evidence to show that the money still remains. He added that Yang is simply accused of faking receipts, and does not "stand to enjoy" any of the proceeds.
Bail was set at $150,000, but the judge also ordered Yang, who is set to appear in court again on Dec 4, to surrender his passport and report to the police at 10am every day. He will leave Changi Prison, where he is in remand, on Monday at the earliest after bail is paid, said his lawyer.
The Attorney-General's Chambers, however, revealed later that it would be making an application to the High Court with regard to the bail decision but did not give details.
Madam Chung's niece, Madam Hedy Mok, who was in court yesterday with her lawyer, told reporters that she was "quite disappointed". She has begun legal proceedings against Yang, including one to claim damages for breaching his duty to her aunt. She alleges that Yang, who first met Madam Chung in 2008, had manipulated the elderly woman into handing him control of her assets worth $40 million.
[email protected]

Source: Straits Times © Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Permission required for reproduction.
 

kezgtree

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Steal S$500k, bail only $150k. Wealth and connections have their privileges under

...maybe this is also part of the aunty $$ that he siphoned off...i guess.
 

bic_cherry

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Steal S$500k, bail only $150k. Wealth and connections have their privileges under

At last, we can see the state courts showing some semblance of some common sense...

Remand for ex-tour guide as court mulls over challenge to bail
Straits Times
Date: 11 Nov 2014
Author: Carolyn Khew

FORMER China tour guide Yang Yin has been remanded while the High Court deliberates over a challenge filed by the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) to reverse his bail order.

The AGC reiterated in court yesterday that Yang should not be granted bail, arguing that the earlier decision by District Judge Eddy Tham had disregarded the 40-year-old as a high flight risk, among other things.

Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon will decide whether to overturn the bail order today.

Last Friday, the prosecution had applied to the High Court to challenge Judge Tham's decision a day earlier to grant the Chinese national bail of $150,000.

Yang, who has been detained since Oct 31, has yet to post bail, even though arrangements have been made to remit the money over to a Singaporean bailor.

During the hearing yesterday, Deputy Chief Prosecutor Tan Ken Hwee said the bail order granted was "palpably wrong", and asked that the accused be remanded pending trial.

Presenting his arguments to Chief Justice Menon, Mr Tan pointed out that Judge Tham failed to recognise there would be no "pull" of bail in this case as the bail money would be coming from Yang's family in China, and not the surety in Singapore.

He also argued that in Yang's case, the sum of $500,000 that had been transferred from 87- year-old widow Chung Khin Chun's account to Yang's parents showed he had the means to abscond. It is not in every case that the prosecution objects to bail for non-bailable offences allegedly committed by non-Singaporeans, Mr Tan added.


Listening to both sides of the argument, the Chief Justice acknowledged there would be "no water off a surety's back" if the source of bail money did not come from the bailor himself.

Addressing this, Yang's lawyer, Mr Wee Pan Lee, suggested that the order be modified such that the bailor put in an additional sum of money so there would be an incentive for him or her to ensure that Yang would not abscond. He said it would have been "foolhardy" for Yang to cut his losses by absconding.

This is the latest development in the legal tussle between Yang and the niece of wealthy widow Madam Chung over her estimated $40 million assets.

Yang faces 331 charges for falsification of receipts worth about $450,000 made to his company, Young Dance and Music Studio.

The prosecution had earlier urged the court to put the bail at $800,000, with four sureties. Yesterday, Mr Tan said the bail, if granted, should be more than $600,000.

Meanwhile, the widow's sister, Madam Doris Chung, assisted in police investigations at the Police Cantonment Complex yesterday. She was accompanied by her daughter, 60-year-old Madam Hedy Mok.

[email protected]

Source: Straits Times © Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Permission required for reproduction.
 
Top