• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Hand surgeon fined

Ripley

Alfrescian
Loyal
Home > Breaking News > Singapore > Story
Oct 12, 2009
Hand surgeon fined <!--10 min-->
<!-- headline one : start --> <!-- headline one : end --> <!-- show image if available --> <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr></tr> <tr> </tr> <tr> </tr> </tbody></table>
A HAND surgeon has been found guilty of professional misconduct and fined $2,000. Dr Jonathan Lee Yi Liang, who practised at True 'Est in Ngee Ann City, faced two charges of professional misconduct over a body contouring procedure known as 'SmartLipo' surgery, said the Singapore Medical Council (SMC) on Monday. The first charge involved the issue of informed consent, while the second charge was over medication given prior to a personal consultation with the patient. The Disciplinary Committee of the SMC acquitted Dr Lee of the first charge but emphasised that informed consent was more than just having a patient sign a consent form. Doctors were expected to sufficiently explain the risks, side-effects and nature of the procedure to the patient, said the council.

In the course of the inquiry, the Committee found that there was a lack of accountability and control measures expected of a medical clinic, as nurses were given the autonomy to administer a sedative drug. Dr Lee 'took no steps to check' whether the patient had been given the drug, the SMC found, and after seeing the patient, he did not give instructions for the drug to be administered either, assuming that it would be done. As such, the Committee found that Dr Lee had not demonstrated the responsibility, supervision and leadership expected of him, as the sole doctor in the clinic. The Committee thus found him guilty of the second charge. Dr Lee was also censured.
 
Top