• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

fucking Bakayaro Japs stupid trying to cover up COVID-19 Pandemic situation Dreaming to CONTINUE OLYMPICS!

HongKanSeng

Alfrescian
Loyal
Remember that fucking USA Military spread COVID to WUHAN during WUHAN's 7th World Military Games sports event, Japs still FOOLISHLY DREAMING to continue with Olympic. Fucking CB 一厢情愿, 掩耳盗铃,不知自量,不知死!

If Olympics were NOT CANCELLED, there will be many SICK & DEAD Athletes, fucking CHILDISH AND NAIVE & SELFISH & SILLY & IGNORANT!


https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/26/opinion/coronavirus-japan-abe.html

Japan Can’t Handle the Coronavirus. Can It Host the Olympics?
How leaders’ sense of entitlement breeds indifference and incompetence.
By Koichi Nakano
Mr. Nakano is a political scientist.
  • Feb. 26, 2020



26Nakano1-articleLarge.jpg

The inadequacy of the government’s response was exposed by the unmitigated epidemiological and public relations disaster that was the saga of the Diamond Princess cruise ship, shown here in Yokohama on Feb. 21.

The inadequacy of the government’s response was exposed by the unmitigated epidemiological and public relations disaster that was the saga of the Diamond Princess cruise ship, shown here in Yokohama on Feb. 21.Credit...Philip Fong/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
阅读简体中文版閱讀繁體中文版

TOKYO — The Japanese government’s response to the coronavirus outbreak has been staggeringly incompetent. Why, when so much is at stake for Japan, especially as the host country of the Olympics this summer?
The first infection in Japan was confirmed on Jan. 28. The World Health Organization declared the coronavirus to be “a public health emergency of international concern” on Jan. 30. But it took until Feb. 17 for the Health Ministry of Japan to even inform the public about when, where and how to contact government health care centers in case of a suspected infection. And it was only this Tuesday that the government finally adopted a “basic policy” for responding to the outbreak — which essentially boiled down to asking people to stay home. As of Wednesday, there were 847 confirmed cases of Covid-19 (and six deaths) in or just offshore of Japan.
Medical professionals are running short of face masks, disinfectant and test kits — and Japan is running short of medical professionals who can perform diagnostic tests. Yet so far Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has rejected the opposition’s demand to increase the budget currently under discussion in Parliament, or the Diet, to help tackle the outbreak; he has said it was premature to assume that the existing budget reserve will be insufficient.
And so the Japanese people have been told not to seek testing, nor bother visiting medical institutions unless their symptoms are severe and lasting. Mr. Abe has, in effect, outsourced the government’s containment efforts to the population itself, while the state concentrates limited resources on the severely ill and makes little effort to increase those resources. He might also have been thinking: With no test, there can be no rise in confirmed cases either.

The inadequacy of the government’s response was laid bare by the unmitigated epidemiological and public relations disaster that was the saga of the Diamond Princess cruise ship. After a 14-day quarantine, at least 634 passengers and crew members (out of a total of 3,645 people) were confirmed to have been infected aboard the ship. “We’re in a petri dish,” one passenger said. “It’s an experiment. We’re their guinea pigs.”

Since people started leaving the ship on Feb. 19, confirmed cases among them have been reported in the United States, Australia, Israel and Britain. Whereas those countries placed returning passengers under another 14-day period of isolation, Japan simply released all Japanese nationals from the boat — and at least one of them later tested positive for Covid-19. Twenty-three passengers, most of them Japanese, were also accidentally allowed to go without having undergone mandatory medical tests.

  • Unlock more free articles.
Create an account or log in

Astonishingly, the Japanese government released without a test more than 90 officials who boarded the ship during the quarantine, even though four had already tested positive — and this, according to one report, because of concern that “they won’t be able to fulfill their official duties if found positive.” The Health Ministry has since agreed to test 41 officials, but it still won’t test any medical professionals and quarantine officers who were on board, on grounds that “they had taken sufficient precautions” themselves.
As some observers have pointed out, a measure of denial and inertia is at play. The Japanese bureaucracy is notoriously dominated by a culture of “kotonakare shugi” (literally, “no-problem-ism”), which prioritizes stability and conformity, and shuns anything that might rock the institutional boat. Sound the alarm about an impending crisis and you might be blamed for causing it.
Editors’ Picks

Stop Trying to Be Productive


They All Retired Before They Hit 40. Then This Happened.


What New York Looked Like During the 1918 Flu Pandemic



merlin_169502562_f1f4508e-61a9-4110-a471-54e0d492604b-articleLarge.jpg

Image
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe speaking during a special gathering in Tokyo to manage the coronavirus outbreak. He is said to be spending only minutes on average at meetings of a dedicated task force he presides.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe speaking during a special gathering in Tokyo to manage the coronavirus outbreak. He is said to be spending only minutes on average at meetings of a dedicated task force he presides. Credit...Jiji Press/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
Mr. Abe’s cabinet set up a task force of ministers to handle the novel coronavirus on Jan. 30, but for many days that group was primarily focused on the situation unfolding in China, particularly on evacuating Japanese nationals from Wuhan, the city at the source of the initial outbreak. As recently as Feb. 13, Japan’s health minister was still saying that more information was necessary “from an epidemiological standpoint to say infections are growing across the country.” Two days later, though, he finally acknowledged that Japan has entered a “new phase” of the outbreak, and now was emphasizing the need to test people and treat the seriously ill. The day after that was the first time the task force convened its panel of experts to seek advice about the conditions in Japan and what measures should be taken.

Why is Mr. Abe — who is no stranger to an authoritarian style of leadership and readily breaks rules and conventions, as well as, arguably, the Constitution, to get his way — not doing more, or more decisively?
The answer might simply be: out of a lack of interest, personal and political. When the expert panel finally gathered on Feb. 16, Mr. Abe addressed it for just three minutes and then spent the rest of the day at home. The task force has met 13 times, but according to the opposition, the prime minister has been seen in attendance a mere 12 minutes on average.
The day after the first Japanese death from Covid-19 was reported, Mr. Abe was at a task force meeting for eight minutes, and then spent nearly three hours at dinner with the chairman and the president of Nikkei, the media organization. Shinjiro Koizumi, the environment minister and a rising star in the ruling party, skipped a task force meeting altogether to attend a New Year’s party with supporters from his constituency.
This is not the first time that Mr. Abe and his entourage display callous indifference in the face of an unfolding disaster. During the summer of 2018, the prime minister and his ruling-party colleagues came under fire for wining and dining in Tokyo during a bout of torrential rains in western Japan that ultimately killed more than 220 people. From the heavy snow that buried and paralyzed Yamanashi in central Japan in 2014 to Faxai and Hagibis, typhoons that devastated parts of eastern Japan last year, the Abe government has often been criticized for exerting far too little leadership to protect the people.
Once again, as Japan struggles to respond to Covid-19, Mr. Abe is largely invisible. Perhaps he — much like President Xi Jinping appears to be doing in China — wants to keep his distances from the crisis for fear of being held responsible for its consequences. But there is another explanation, both simpler and more systemic.
The Japanese government today is dominated by third- and fourth-generation descendants of long political dynasties, who inherited such important assets as name recognition, dedicated electoral machines, ample tax-exempt campaign funds and vast networks of cronies and special interest groups. Both the prime minister and the deputy prime minister, Taro Aso, are the grandchildren of former prime ministers; Mr. Koizumi, the environment minister, is the son of an ex-prime minister; the defense minister, Taro Kono, is the son of a former deputy prime minister.

Mr. Abe owes his premiership to the accident of birth rather than the democratic will of the Japanese people.
More than one-third of the lawmakers from his Liberal Democratic Party are hereditary politicians. Mr. Abe, who first was prime minister in 2006-7, won back the presidency of the L.D.P. in September 2012 — soon before the party won the election that propelled him to the premiership again — even though the preferences of rank-and-file party members placed him a distant second out of five candidates for the position. (He won because the views of members who are parliamentarians are weighted more.) His current cabinet of 19 ministers counts five sons or grandsons of former members of the Diet; another three have relatives who were lawmakers. The Japanese government is a privileged club of hereditary politicians and their opportunistic sycophants, and a comforting echo chamber.
Japan’s leaders are so out of touch with the lives of ordinary people that they seem genuinely uninterested in their plight. That, in turn, allows an entire bureaucracy to wallow in denial, even over a crisis like the coronavirus outbreak and just a few months away from the Olympics.
Related
Shinzo Abe, Japan’s Political Houdini, Can’t Escape Coronavirus Backlash
March 5, 2020





https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2...als-refuse-coronavirus-patients/#.Xo2egfFS-V4






n-refused-a-20200227-870x552.jpg
Health minister Katsunobu Kato speaks at a news conference Tuesday on basic policies for handling COVID-19 infections. | KYODO


National
Hospitals in Japan refusing to test many who suspect they have COVID-19
Experts say strict testing requirements leave institutions confused about who to check
JIJI








Some medical institutions in Japan have been rejecting possible COVID-19 patients under the strict but ambiguous testing guidelines currently in place, leaving many patients shunted from hospital to hospital.
Experts point out that the vague criteria have caused confusion among medical staff.

According to the health ministry, eligibility for the test is limited to two groups of people: those who have come into close contact with patients confirmed as infected with the new virus, and those who have traveled recently to infected areas in China, have a fever of at least 37.5 degrees Celsius and have pneumonia-like symptoms that require hospitalization.
But the final decision on whether to test a patient is also “up to the doctor’s overall judgment.”
A government worker in his 30s who lives in Tokyo visited a hospital after his temperature rose to 39 degrees on Feb. 17. When he mentioned that he had recently visited Taiwan, he was advised to go to a dedicated COVID-19 consultation center.
RELATED STORIES
The center told him that visitors to Taiwan were not eligible for the test. After being refused by two more hospitals due to reasons such as inadequate facilities, he was finally seen by a doctor at a general hospital where he took a lung X-ray. He was given the all-clear.
“I suppose it couldn’t be helped” with the ongoing spread of the virus, he said.
A 29-year-old male company employee in Tokyo called the COVID-19 consultation center after developing a fever of 39 degrees on Feb. 12 as well as feeling lethargic and having diarrhea. He had recently been in contact with a person who had traveled to the Chinese city of Wuhan, the epicenter of the outbreak.
The center told him to visit a local hospital because he had not had close contact with the individual with Wuhan travel history. He was then refused by a hospital in Tokyo, but was later able to see a doctor at a hospital that specializes in treating infections.
Symptoms of infection with the novel coronavirus may be difficult to distinguish from those of other illnesses, and it is said that most cases of infection do not become severe.
“It’s likely that many people have recovered without even realizing they’d been infected,” said an official at a disease control authority in Chiba Prefecture.
A Chiba woman in her 70s who on Feb. 20 was found to have been infected had previously been told to note her symptoms, but had not been tested. She had gone on a three-day bus tour ending Feb. 18, but the symptoms continued and so she visited the hospital and then tested positive.
Suggesting one reason so many hospitals have been refusing patients, a Tokyo Metropolitan Government official said, “Medical institutions are probably overreacting,” fearing the risks of in-hospital infection.
“There seems to be confusion among medical staff because the wording of the virus test criteria, ‘up to the doctor’s comprehensive judgment,’ is unclear,” the official added.
Masahiro Kami, a physician and head of the nonprofit Medical Governance Research Institute, said that almost every day he sees patients who are suspected of having the coronavirus but cannot be tested because their symptoms are mild.
“The current criteria, that only people with severe symptoms can be tested, is not appropriate,” Kami said. “The government lacks the perspective of responding to patients’ anxieties.”

Coronavirus banner

JOIN THE CONVERSATION
GET THE BEST OF THE JAPAN TIMES IN FIVE EASY PIECES WITH TAKE 5






PHOTOS


search icon
Click to enlarge

Health minister Katsunobu Kato speaks at a news conference Tuesday on basic policies for handling COVID-19 infections. | KYODO



KEYWORDS


medicine, health, hospitals, MHLW, covid-19








17 new cases of mystery virus reported in China

China reported 17 new cases of the mysterious SARS-like virus on Sunday, including three in a severe condition, heightening fears ahead of the Lunar New Ye


























  • WHAT’S TRENDING
  • EDITORS’ PICKS








PODCAST



DEEP DIVE FEATURES



JAPAN NETWORK UPDATES





SPECIAL SUPPLEMENTS





















Read more


SUPPLEMENTS BINDER










international-reports















Return to The Japan Times top page
 

HongKanSeng

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://thediplomat.com/2020/03/japans-limited-response-to-the-covid-19-pandemic/


Japan’s Limited Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

With limited testing and little interest in social distancing, Japan’s coronavirus response is puzzling.



By Hayden Marks

March 25, 2020
Japan’s Limited Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Visitors wearing face masks walk under cherry blossoms at Ueno Park in Tokyo, March 24, 2020.
Credit: AP Photo/Koji Sasahara
As one of the first countries besides China to have been affected by COVID-19, and with the highest percentage of elderly people in the world, who are at higher risk of either becoming seriously ill or dying from the disease, one might assume that Japan would have been at the forefront of developing and implementing measures to help prevent the spread of the disease. Yet, apart from the early closures of schools, which, against expert advice, look set to reopen as early as next week, and a stern warning against congregation and non-essential gatherings, Japan’s measures have seemed almost lax in comparison to the lengths countries such as Italy, the United States, U.K., and Australia have gone to in recent weeks.
In regards to testing for the virus for example, while on the surface Japan may appear to have only a small number of confirmed cases at the present, this low number is most likely the result of its similarly low rate of testing. To highlight just how little Japan is testing, my home state of South Australia, with an estimated population of 1.7 million people, has, at the time of writing, tested 16,717 people. Japan on the other hand, with an estimated population of 126 million people, has only tested 16,484 individuals.
Similarly, while world leaders such as Boris Johnson, Angela Merkel, and Emmanuel Macron have gone on record telling their relative populaces to remain at home and practice social distancing, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has been barely sighted throughout the entire ordeal. Yoichi Masuzoe, the former health minister who served during the 2009 swine flu crisis, has even gone so far as to label Abe’s handling of the virus “disastrous.” And nowhere are the results of this lack of leadership more evident than in how the Japanese population has responded.
Over the weekend, despite most of the world being in a state of self-policed lock down, Japanese people flocked in the thousands to cherry blossom hotspots across Tokyo, in celebration of the coming of spring. I visited Shinjuku National Park on Sunday afternoon and witnessed as thousands of revellers — all bottlenecking paths, posing for pictures, having picnics, and intermingling without care — bucked the global trend of social distancing and self-isolation in favor of tradition. Similarly, on Friday night, Shibuya crossing was as busy as ever, restaurants and bars were full of jovial patrons, and the line to the recently opened Shibuya Sky was at least 100 strong, with most viewings booked out entirely. As Harumi Murakami described it for the East Asia Forum: “The contrast between Beijing and Tokyo is striking and unflattering to Japan. Downtown Beijing is deserted as people try to avoid spreading the virus by staying home. Tokyo looks like business as usual, with trains and subways still packed.”
Amid the ongoing crisis, Abe and the Japanese government have yet to develop any real plan to tackle the virus, or provide any real leadership to the people in how they should deal with it. In fact, according to Murakami, Abe has bumbled the country’s response entirely. From failing to place anyone in charge of Japan’ response or create a competent team of experts to deal with the crisis; to failing to incorporate the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, who are heavily involved in infectious disease; to the delay in enlisting the help of the private sector in regards to developing testing kits — every step of the way mismanagement has been rife. Most importantly however, is that while other country’s top leaders have stepped up and provided direction for their people in these pressing times, Abe and his government have been practically invisible. As a result, the people are left not knowing the severity of the virus or just how dangerous simply carrying on business as usual could potentially be.
With studies showing that Japan has yet to hit its peak infection rate, perhaps it’s time for leaders to step up and provide the leadership necessary to prevent what might very well be a catastrophic explosion in cases, in a country where 28 percent of the population rests in the highest risk category for serious illness and death.
Hayden Marks is an English teacher and curriculum developer in Tokyo, Japan. Marks has a Bachelor’s degree in global politics and currently pursuing a Master’s degree in information management.
Tags

COVID-19
C
The Philippines’ Coronavirus Lockdown Is Becoming a Crackdown April 03, 2020
The Philippines’ Coronavirus Lockdown Is Becoming a Crackdown

Where In the World Are There No Coronavirus Cases? April 03, 2020
Where In the World Are There No Coronavirus Cases?

Did Turkmenistan Really Ban the Word ‘Coronavirus’? April 01, 2020
Did Turkmenistan Really Ban the Word ‘Coronavirus’?

Multimedia
M
Inside COVID-19 Quarantine in Kyrgyzstan April 06, 2020
Inside COVID-19 Quarantine in Kyrgyzstan

North Korea’s March 2020 Return to Missile Testing: Hard Times Ahead? April 02, 2020
North Korea’s March 2020 Return to Missile Testing: Hard Times Ahead?

Japan’s Postponement of the Olympics: What Next? March 28, 2020
Japan’s Postponement of the Olympics: What Next?

Interview
I
Interview: Robert Ward and Yuka Koshino on Geo-Economics in East Asia March 31, 2020
Interview: Robert Ward and Yuka Koshino on Geo-Economics in East Asia
By Franz-Stefan Gady

Geo-economics can be a subtle tool of statecraft, but not all such tools are benign and their deployment can be destabilizing for countries as well as the international system.

COVID-19
 

HongKanSeng

Alfrescian
Loyal
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...tokyo-olympics-shinzo-abe-government-12518772



Commentary: Japan’s COVID-19 response is hamstrung by bureaucracy

Bureaucrats have failed to put together a competent team or provide transparent reports about decision-making processes, says an observer.

People wearing protective face masks, following an outbreak of the coronavirus, take a selfie in front of the Giant Olympic rings at the waterfront area at Odaiba Marine Park in Tokyo, Japan, March 6, 2020. REUTERS/Stoyan Nenov


By Hiromi Murakami
10 Mar 2020 06:12AM (Updated: 10 Mar 2020 06:20AM)

Bookmark


TOKYO: If the Japanese government’s performance in dealing with the COVID-19 threat is any indication, the upcoming Tokyo Olympic Games are doomed to fail even before they begin.
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe is preparing emergency coronavirus legislation, and a majority of schools are now closed as Abe requested for around a month in an effort to contain the spread of the virus.


But the move is too little, too late. The scary truth is that no one is in charge of managing Japan’s response to COVID-19.
Bureaucrats have failed to put together a competent team or provide transparent reports about decision-making processes. Meanwhile, political leaders make themselves look busy by jumping from meeting to meeting and repeating experts’ statements to the press instead of making the difficult decisions that are becoming increasingly urgent.
READ: Commentary: Why Japan’s move to close schools during COVID-19 outbreak upset many – and not just parents
READ: Commentary: Japan shows how not to deal with a COVID-19 outbreak



The contrast between Beijing and Tokyo is striking and unflattering to Japan. Downtown Beijing is deserted as people try to avoid spreading the virus by staying home. Tokyo looks like business as usual, with trains and subways still packed.
The Japanese government has shifted its efforts to contain the spread of the virus from seaports and airports to focusing on communities and asking people to stay at home.
But the messages have been mixed. The media remains optimistic, reporting that the virus is mild and will likely taper off as summer arrives. As a result, not all local communities are adhering to Abe’s request to close schools.
There is little detailed symptom data available from authorities and medical doctors. Only healthcare workers are voicing real concern, while the public struggles to judge how to protect itself from this ‘very mild’ yet deadly virus.
LACKING COORDINATION AND LEADERSHIP
This is not to downplay the efforts of the individual authorities who are engaged at the frontline. The emergency budget of US$138 million – though far less than emergency funding in the United States – is a significant step forward, helping to produce more testing kits, secure more beds in health facilities and fund research about the virus.
But what’s lacking is coordination and leadership.

Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe attends a news conference on coronavirus at his official residence in Tokyo, Japan February 29, 2020. REUTERS/Issei Kato/Files


Bureaucratic silos have resulted in parallel task forces and meetings convened by the Prime Minister’s office, the Cabinet office, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and the Tokyo metropolitan government. Health experts and officials from various agencies debate the same topics repetitively in multiple meetings, while Abe has put no one in charge.
Arbitrary bureaucratic interference is preventing the authorities from implementing a desperately needed nationwide effort that includes the best experts from academia, research centres and industry. The National Center for Global Health and Medicine – one of the main research centres for infectious diseases – was not invited to be part of a crucial task force.
There have also been delays in rolling out favipiravir, the antiviral drug being developed by Fujifilm that’s believed to be potentially effective against the virus, because it was approved only as a treatment for influenza, not COVID-19.
READ: Commentary: Explosion in COVID-19 cases - was South Korea just unlucky?
READ Commentary: Coronavirus – Where should Koreans evacuated from Wuhan stay?

Lessons learned from past crises in Japan such as the 2011 tsunami and the Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster appear to have been forgotten. Japan’s civil service lacks institutional memory as the system circulates bureaucrats from one position to another every two years and prioritises internal incentives on domestic issues rather than on building global networks.
The recommendations from the first ever independent investigation committee of the Diet have not improved the system, nor changed the mindset of the policy elite.
CROSS-SECTOR COLLABORATION PREVENTED
This time of crisis is a chance for Japan to develop innovative solutions to these complex challenges. But the authorities are blindfolded within the existing jurisdiction-based framework and continue to misallocate resources and prevent cross-sector collaboration.
The National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID) was solely designated to produce polymerase chain reaction (PCR) diagnosis kits and to handle testing because it sits under the Health Ministry’s supervision, for example.
But NIID is not the most productive device maker and its PCR testing method takes at least six hours to produce a result.

Workers wearing protective gear prepare to transfer passengers, who tested positive for coronavirus, from the cruise ship Diamond Princess to a hospital, after the ship arrived at Daikoku Pier Cruise Terminal in Yokohama, south of Tokyo, Japan February 6, 2020. REUTERS/Kim Kyung-Hoon


The Institute originally only had the capacity to test 200 cases per day. This increased to over 400 tests per day when it introduced three-shift operations to run 24-hour testing.
But by early February NIID was crying out for help to increase its capacity, prompting the government to finally go to the private sector to produce non-PCR testing devices in late February.
The authorities could have turned to the private sector for help from the beginning; there are many efficient flu-diagnosis device-makers in Japan who would have responded to incentives for quick and effective diagnosis kits. The hesitation to give the antibody to private makers has resulted in a severe shortage of testing capacity across the country.
The absence of appropriate risk communication is feeding confusion and hysteria in the foreign media. The chain of command is vague and bureaucrats have incentives to cast aside things that are not written in the rules, further delaying responses.
READ: Commentary: What does Ronan Keating know about Singapore ports?
READ: Commentary: Three scenarios if the COVID-19 outbreak gets worse

SOME GOOD NEWS
The good news is that despite all the mishandling and delays, the majority of Japanese people still trust the government and try to follow its instructions. Local institutions and individuals are taking serious prevention measures, even as Japanese leaders are failing to manage the situation.
Before it’s too late, the authorities need first to designate a person in charge, and second, to provide reliable data and patient symptom information in a timely manner so that communities can fight the virus effectively.
The world is watching to see if the Japanese government can step up and show the commitment needed to overcome this enormous challenge ahead of the Tokyo Olympic Games.
BOOKMARK THIS: Our comprehensive coverage of the novel coronavirus and its developments
Download our app or subscribe to our Telegram channel for the latest updates on the coronavirus outbreak: https://cna.asia/telegram
Hiromi Murakami is an Adjunct Senior Fellow with the Global Health Innovation Policy Program at the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS), Tokyo. This commentary first appeared on East Asia Forum.
Source: CNA/el (ml)
Tagged Topics


Bookmark
 
Top