• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Bible and history

Ash007

Alfrescian
Loyal
Don't forget the crusades which probably causes the current turmoil in the middle east now as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusades
The Crusades were a series of religious expeditionary wars blessed by the Pope and the Catholic Church, with the main goal of restoring Christian access to the holy places in and near Jerusalem. The Crusades were originally launched in response to a call from the leaders of the Byzantine Empire for help to fight the expansion into Anatolia of Muslim Seljuk Turks who had cut off access to Jerusalem.[1] The crusaders comprised military units of Roman Catholics from all over western Europe, and were not under unified command. The main series of Crusades, primarily against Muslims, occurred between 1095 and 1291. Historians have given many of the earlier crusades numbers. After some early successes, the later crusades failed and the crusaders were defeated and forced to return home.
Several hundred thousand soldiers became Crusaders by taking vows;[2] the Pope granted them plenary indulgence.[3] Their emblem was the cross—"crusade" is derived from the French term for taking up the cross. Many were from France and called themselves "Franks," which became the common term used by Muslims.[4]

Any particular religion in itself is not bad, its men using religion as an excuse to do bad things that are bad.

a "good" religion is like an enclosed rotten egg. if you dont break it, it wont smell.
i don't recall any serious human live lost because of buddhism even though it belong to a pampered prince who got shocked, he should have seen a therapist if there is one back in those day to overcome his trauma instead of running away and hide under the tree.

unlike christianity who had burnt, hung, raped, tortured, forced conversion on an epic scale throughout the history. remember the spanish conquistadors' invasion into south america? how many natives there had died?
 

vamjok

Alfrescian
Loyal
There you go! Unlike Christianity.....who were those people in this 'Christianity'? Go go back again, the Vatican, the Vatican....they have nothing to do with Christianity....to many true believers of the Bible, Vatican, RC is just a institution....many Christians, true-believers don't assocate them.....Spanish....by and large they were and I think still are RC....Don't bark at the wrong tree, please....The most commonly used words by atheists to rebuke what true-believers believe are: They all; the Christianity; those priests; those Popes; those pastors. But who are 'those'...they don't represent true-believers, neither do they represent our Living God, Jesus Christ. They are just 'those' people...nothing to do with Jesus. You have to ask yourself, did Jesus went round asking money; was He given high position in the government, in the religious council, was He given a royal burial....No! Quite to the contrary....Jesus is Jesus...don't connect Him to the 'those' you mentioned. And what the Spanish invasion has to do with Jesus. Just cannot understand and cannot connect what you trying to connect.

But you still have not answered my question...you have fundamental disagreement with your friend...My God is my G....????

talk cock, you know the history of the development of modern christianity a not. All branches off from RC. if you were to ask me, the real and authentic form of christainity has got to be the RC, the rest of the branches form to break away due to political reason and change certain part of the bible to fit their own agenda. Christians true-believers hur? just bunch of selective reader of the original form of christianity.

the current form of christianity that you believe in DID NOT EXIST IN THAT ERA. the only form of christainity then was the RC. so in another word, you are a cult
 
Last edited:

vamjok

Alfrescian
Loyal
That is a misinterpretation.

http://www.thebigview.com/buddhism/emptiness.html




色之空,空之色

u like that put idiot like him dun understand one, too chim already. you should give him this example,

its like you make love with a whore, after you fuck finish how you feel? shoik? what about 1 hr later or 10 hr later did you feel the same? after 10 hr, you got fuck like never fuck like that. but you did indeed fuck 10 hr ago.

so got fuck = no fuck, no fuck = got fuck. zazen!
 

Ash007

Alfrescian
Loyal
He was asking how "zero" nihilism could be equated to the quote of 色之空,空之色. The article and link basically answered the question. In fact there are several, mathematical and scientific discoveries that relates to the same concept in nature.

u like that put idiot like him dun understand one, too chim already. you should give him this example,

its like you make love with a whore, after you fuck finish how you feel? shoik? what about 1 hr later or 10 hr later did you feel the same? after 10 hr, you got fuck like never fuck like that. but you did indeed fuck 10 hr ago.

so got fuck = no fuck, no fuck = got fuck. zazen!
 

Clone

Alfrescian
Loyal
He was asking how "zero" nihilism could be equated to the quote of 色之空,空之色. The article and link basically answered the question. In fact there are several, mathematical and scientific discoveries that relates to the same concept in nature.

色 (form) is one of the 5 Skandhas (heaps). At higher rungs are the other 4 - feelings, perceptions, impulses and consciousness.

It will be easier to understand the concept of 空 (emptiness) with all 5 Skandhas (heaps) introduced.

Any input most welcomed.
 

Clone

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_late_ancient_Christianity

talk cock, you know the history of the development of modern christianity a not. All branches off from RC. if you were to ask me, the real and authentic form of christainity has got to be the RC, the rest of the branches form to break away due to political reason and change certain part of the bible to fit their own agenda. Christians true-believers hur? just bunch of selective reader of the original form of christianity.

the current form of christianity that you believe in DID NOT EXIST IN THAT ERA. the only form of christainity then was the RC. so in another word, you are a cult
 

fishbuff

Alfrescian
Loyal
the way i see it; humans have sex for procreation and pleasure.

to deny oneself of this is to deny his own human nature and humanity.

that is why we see celebrate catholic priests molesting kids and temple monks sneaking out to seek whores.

i have seen those monks that come to funerals to conduct services, drove a bmw with rolex watches, and invite the coffin acquaint to his house for drink and watch porn. but this are in the minority.
 
Top