• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Fearful famiLEE LEEgime backing out of their own lame policies

uncleyap

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 11, 2008
Messages
5,769
Points
48
http://uncleyap-news.blogspot.com/2010/05/fearful-familee-leegime-backing-out-of.html

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

<!-- Begin .post --> Fearful famiLEE LEEgime backing out of their own lame policies

We may make at least the 2 following observations:

1. famiLEE LEEgime is really scared of the drawback they faced.
2. The Old Dog Thief Lee Kuan Yew dare not come out, he is hiding behind his son this time.

:-)
You should watch the video of the faces of Ass Loong Son & Ng Eng Hen on TV at press conference tonight. :D
The opposition should move against them on this issue and take it towards the GE.

;)



CNA News URL1
PSLE Mother Tongue exams should motivate students to attain proficiency
By Hoe Yeen Nie | Posted: 11 May 2010 2100 hrs






SINGAPORE : News that there will be no change to the weighting of Mother Tongue at PSLE has brought about much relief from teachers.

But some observers said the challenge now is to create a new examination structure to provide a clear recognition of effort.

There should also be incentives for students to move up to the next level of proficiency.

In recent weeks, the internet and mainstream media had been abuzz over news that the weighting of the mother tongue subject at the PSLE could be cut.

It also sparked at least two public petitions against the proposal.

And now, with the government clarifying its stand, the response is one of overall relief.

In statements to MediaCorp, unions representing Malay and Tamil teachers welcomed the government's aim to maintain Singapore's bilingual policy, stating that it has worked well so far.

The Chinese Teachers' Union added that the move would help raise morale among its members, some of whom had felt discouraged by a proposed cut in subject weighting.

Writer and former DJ Danny Yeo, who had helped to publicise the petition-signing at Hong Lim Park on Sunday, said it was a positive outcome, adding that bilingualism has always been a strong point of the education system in Singapore.

The Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry also expressed support for initiatives to improve the teaching of Mother Tongue languages.

Teachers said the focus now should be on how mother tongue languages are taught and tested.

"The emphasis will not be on scoring well for the exams, but on achieving a certain level of proficiency in the language," said Lim Chin Nam, president of the Singapore Chinese Teachers' Union.

But some said as the focus shifts towards more creative lesson tools, like drama, the question is how should they be assessed?

"Once we move away from pen and paper tests, subjectivity becomes more present. How (do we) ensure that some subjective assessment, being present in the system, does not compromise fairness & equity across the system? This is something that has to be thought through," said Josephine Teo, Government Parliamentary Committee (GPC) for Education.

Mrs Teo added that with lessons pitched at different levels for those with varying language proficiencies, another challenge is to develop a system of benchmarking one set of tests against the other, in a way that is fair and that will motivate students to excel.

In this light, she noted that reducing the subject weighting at the exams would not have helped students who are struggling with the subject, because they would still have to sit for the exams.

It would also discourage those who have made the effort and produced results, only to see the subject account for a smaller percentage of the aggregate score. - CNA /ls


CNA News URL2

Mother Tongue weighting for PSLE to remain
By Hwee Goh | Posted: 11 May 2010 1511 hrs


<table style="text-align: left; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px;" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="260"> <tbody><tr> <td width="20" align="right">
</td> <td width="240" align="right">
phpfpkp2J.jpg
</td> </tr> <tr> <td height="60" valign="top">
</td> <td class="update" height="80" valign="top"> <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td bgcolor="#f6f6f6" width="138">Photos </td> <td bgcolor="#f6f6f6" width="47">1 of 1</td> <td bgcolor="#f6f6f6" width="18">
</td> <td bgcolor="#f6f6f6" width="19">
</td> </tr> </tbody></table>
dotline_240.gif

Primary school students in Singapore. (file pic)</td> </tr> <tr> <td>
</td> <td class="update">
</td> </tr> <tr> <td>
</td> <td> <table style="background-color: rgb(204, 204, 204);" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="240"> <tbody><tr> <td valign="top" width="100%">
</td> </tr> </tbody></table> </td> </tr> </tbody></table>



SINGAPORE: The weighting of the Mother Tongue language will not be reduced at the Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE). Instead it will be taught in a new way to cater to differing abilities and to meet the dynamic needs of the student population.

Right at the top of an hour-long interview, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong set the record straight on the weighting issue.

But change is still ahead in a big way.

Mr Lee has stressed many times the fluidity of the situation in terms of new research and IT in the teaching of language.

And this year, Primary Six students will take their exams based on a new syllabus rolled out after a review as recent as in 2004.

PM Lee said: "We have to look ahead because if we don't, by the time the situation is upon us and we start thinking and then we make changes, it's another five years and we will be chasing our tail again.

"And meanwhile another five years of students will have their less optimal experience with Mother Tongue, and to put it bluntly, we will have quite a lot of trouble with Mother Tongue."

Mr Lee also addressed the huge debate after media reports that the Education Ministry was looking at whether to reduce the weighting of the Mother Tongue Language (MTL).

Education Minister Ng Eng Hen explained: "In my interview, I said MOE was looking at options to address the overemphasis on exams, where 'MTL counts for so much in the PSLE'.

"Singaporeans became concerned that MOE was proposing to reduce the weighting of MTL in PSLE. This is not the case. I think I should have chosen my words more carefully and apologise for creating the wrong impression."

Mr Lee said: "We watched the reaction develop. ... We knew we needed to respond but at the same time we wanted to make sure that we put the whole picture out and not just put out a quick reassurance - sorry everybody is upset, therefore we are not doing anything and fall back onto the status quo because the status quo is not tenable.

"We have to move, we have to change the content, we have to change the resources, we have to change the examinations."

In fact, in February at the Istana, the Prime Minister and Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew met key Education Ministry officials and 50 Mother Tongue educators to share with them the need to change and to tap their ideas, moving forward.

PM Lee said many who have benefited from Singapore's bilingual education had spoken up this time and that he shares the goals of these parents to keep bilingualism alive and yet give students their best head start possible. - CNA/vm
 
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ezboBBKsAN0&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ezboBBKsAN0&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
 
LKy the old dog thief shut up about this issue until now. Hiding behind his own lame Ass Loong Son for the 1st time (as I recall). There is a reason - but not only one.

The old dog had just recently offered his (unnecessary & uninvited) advice to PRC, against their mother-tongue, to learn English in order to become Asian Financial Center - how lame; how arrogant; naive; short-sighted & audaciously! He did just only a week ago before his LEEgime backed out of this (lame; how arrogant; naive; short-sighted & audaciously) policy on PSLE mother-tongue! :D:rolleyes:

Here is the evidence from his office:

http://www.pmo.gov.sg/News/Transcri...must+master+English+to+be+top+banking+hub.htm




Home > Media Centre > In the News > Minister Mentor > MM: 'Shanghai must master English to be top banking hub'


News: The Straits Times - 3 May 2010




'Shanghai must master English to be top banking hub'
By Victoria Vaughan


ENGLISH is the missing ingredient that stands in the way of Shanghai becoming a global banking centre and competing with the likes of Hong Kong, Singapore and Tokyo, said Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew.
The city has the physical infrastructure that could return it to its glory days in the 1920s and 1930s.
But the software is missing, he told a lawyer from Shanghai attending the Inter-Pacific Bar Association conference at the Marina Bay Sands yesterday.
Shanghai, said MM Lee, is going to be the biggest, largest and most sought-after city for the banking industry and many others.
'You will have all the brains, you'll have all the accountants, lawyers, but none of yours will be able to speak and work in English and the banking business is in English,' he said, adding that the annual reports of all banks are in English.
He also said the reason Singapore has succeeded in spite of Tokyo is that 'we use English'.
'So, if Shanghai wants to become THE centre in today's world... it must develop a large English-speaking population,' he said, suggesting a pool of one million to two million people speaking English fluently.
'I know you're learning English very fast but you have a problem in that you don't have an English-speaking climate,' he added.
One way to overcome it is to set up English villages, such as those in South Korea, where people meet and talk in English, he suggested.
Good English teachers are vital too, he added.
Citing Singapore, Mr Lee noted that English is widely used.
'Everyone in Singapore, taxi drivers, hawkers, will speak to you in English and apart from banks, all the factories, all the production centres, whether it's Japanese, Germans, whatever, when they come here, they speak in English. It's the second language of the world.'
Mr Lee was then asked about Tokyo's financial prowess despite its apparent lack of English speakers.
He replied that this disadvantage had begun to hurt Japan.
'I don't want to put down Japan. I'm good friends with the Japanese but the number of foreign banks that have moved their headquarters from Tokyo to Singapore is not inconsiderable.'
He also said it was difficult for foreigners to integrate into the society, adding that the nuances of the Japanese language were hard to master, especially for Westerners.

- end of ST article
<hr>

Reading from old dog thief's suggestion to PRC, isn't LEEgime's lame greedy and naive mother tongue policy one aimed (blindly and foolishly) to emphasize English Education in their own naive hope to retain their losing position to be Asian Financial Center? :rolleyes::rolleyes::eek:

Classically famiLEE LEEgime's education & cultural policies had treated languages & culture like UNDERWEAR that they can CHANGE from one to another as and when they felt the necessity. They will claim (childishly) that they have the Advantage in one economy simply by immediately shift their language and educational policies. This is Cultural & Lingual Opportunism reflecting Greed and Recklessness!:mad: Which uniquely Singapore is a classic feature (Ah-Beng-ism) of myopic famiLEE LEEgime.

Lee Kuan Yew Old Dog Thief is a Cultural & Ethnic Traitor, and as Ah-Beng as he is, he & his LEEgime lack the understanding that Language & Culture is ROOT and FOUNDATION that can not be freely shifted nor changed (like their underwear) as and when their greed need to be quickly satisfied.

They have no idea what is mother tongue, they don't know their own mother nor ancestors, only $$$$MONEY$$$$ is their mother and ancestor!
:mad:


 
Last edited:
Lee Kuan Yew old dog thief sour-grapes in ShangHai

http://uncleyap-kh.blogspot.com/2010/05/blog-post_17.html



<!-- Begin .post -->
</pre>
<div class="post"><a name="8079566548726191389"></a>

<h3 class="post-title">

老狗贼李光耀贪心无脑唯利是图的文化语言政策自我暴露

</h3>


<div class="post-body">
<div>
<div style="clear:both;"></div><div style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.pmo.gov.sg/News/Transcripts/Minister+Mentor/Shanghai+must+master+English+to+be+top+banking+hub.htm">新加坡总理公署网页有关讲稿记录链接</a><br /><br />老狗贼李光耀的李家王朝向来有这样贪心无脑唯利是图的文化和语言政策,就是无论世界上哪里的经济沸腾就自称新加坡的语言文化有经济优势。也就是说对于国家的文化和语言政策的考量,是及其眼光短浅,本末倒置的。完全看在“钱”的份上来考量。<br /><br />语言和文化是国家人民世代承传的传统价值,而世界经济的优劣改变却是瞬间短暂的现象。老狗贼李光耀和李家王朝根本是“无根蚀本”的“文化盲”,眼里除了“钱”就什么都看不到。根本不认识自己的祖宗和文化。<br /><br />滥把语言文化和传统当成“内裤”一样,随意更换。<br /><br />看见钱就可以把自己的祖宗也换了。非常可笑;肤浅;虚浮;幼稚,又不知羞耻十分自大。<br /><br /></div><a href="http://uncleyap-news.blogspot.com/2010/05/fearful-familee-leegime-backing-out-of.html">最近老狗贼李光耀的阿斗小子和教育部长为了自己的“母语教育政策”被人民愤怒的批评</a>,道歉和放弃了被强烈反对的新政策。老狗贼李光耀都至今不敢吭声。<br /><br /><span id="MainContentPH" style="display: inline-block;"><span style=";font-family:Tahoma;font-size:85%;" ></span></span><div style="text-align: justify; color: rgb(51, 51, 255);"><span id="MainContentPH" style="display: inline-block;"><span style=";font-family:Tahoma;font-size:85%;" ><blockquote>'So, if Shanghai wants to become THE centre in today's world... it must develop a large English-speaking population,' he said, suggesting a pool of one million to two million people speaking English fluently.</blockquote></span></span></div><span id="MainContentPH" style="display: inline-block;"><span style=";font-family:Tahoma;font-size:85%;" ><br /><br /><br /></span></span><div style="text-align: justify;">老狗贼李光耀现在在上海丢人现眼的发表谬论,<span style="color: rgb(102, 0, 204);">根本是看中国发展和发达超越新加坡而眼红</span>。这是走进别人家的葡萄园吃不着,说别人的<span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 204, 0);">葡萄酸</span>。<br /><br />老狗贼李光耀的狗眼瞎了,却自以为是,自以为有经验,自以为有眼光。<br /><br />他看不出来,这年头世界上讲英语的国家都穷了!<br /><br />他妄说上海人必须讲英语才能成为世界的金融中心。<br /><br />这年头讲英语有什么优势成为世界的金融中心?<br /><br />讲英语要招待“洋叫化子”?打发“洋乞丐”?<br /><br />欧美国家都在金融风暴当中全面沉沦。讲英语的洋人都早晚不再主宰资本主义世界了。<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(51, 0, 153);">讲英语有什么优势成为世界的金融中心呢?洋人自己都在忙着学亚洲语言,而瞎狗眼的李家王朝居然还搞颠倒的母语教育政策!自己不知道笑话还居然到上海去丢人现眼发表谬论!真实是马不知脸长!</span><br /><br /><br />世界的主要金融实力将於今后至少半个世纪内掌握在亚洲人的手上。<br /><br />老狗贼的狗眼瞎,永远见洋人就拜;见亚洲人就踩。他这样的狗性难改是深刻的本性。这本性无法配合自己的贪心无脑唯利是图政策。所以就出现了自相矛盾的失误。可悲可笑!<br /><br /></div><div style="clear:both; padding-bottom:0.25em"></div>
</pre>
</div>
</div>

<p class="post-footer">
<em>posted by uncleyap at <a href="http://uncleyap-kh.blogspot.com/2010/05/blog-post_17.html" title="permanent link">6:19 PM</a></em>

</p>

</div>
<!-- End .post -->
</pre>


</pre>
 
老狗贼李光耀在这两天的早报瞎说:

美国至少还可以在亚太发挥30-50年的影响力。:p:oIo:

我说:老狗贼的狗眼瞎得厉害了!

这个世界改变的速度越来越,越来越强烈,越来越现实

美国对亚洲只剩下负面的影响力了,就是说例如拖垮亚洲经济这类的影响力。

在这世界要当老大必须一点条件都不能少。这是完全没有折扣优待的。

当老大的第一条件,拳头一定要最硬,不是嘴硬(像老狗贼李光耀这样子),是拳头一定要最硬。

当老大的第二条件,钱包一定要最饱实,不能只是空城计。

当老大的第三条件,讲话要算数,一言九鼎。

美国当今还有这样的条件吗?:rolleyes:;):D

当今在联合国,在国际上,美国所讲的话能算数吗?

在老狗贼李光耀所讲的亚太区域里面,美国有能力有地位有把握吗?

简直是笑话!

军事上美国在伊拉克连年一败涂地;在阿富汗也满头包子;伊朗;巴基斯坦;根本不看美国在眼里,把美国当成猴子来耍!北朝鲜也是这样子!美国在亚太过去所控制的资源已经大幅度丧失。外交上也没什么国家买帐了。 在索马里,BLACK HAWK DOWN, 连海盗也对付不了。在整个中东到处吃亏失败。

以前效忠美国的军事盟国一个个的衰弱;倒霉;背叛;疏远了。

今天的美国拳头还能算最硬吗?:D

美国现在背一屁股债,多少辈子才能还?钱包是空得不能再空的了。

能当什么老大?

发挥什么样的影响力?

:confused::rolleyes:

老狗贼李光耀,说的是什么瞎话?



<hr>

http://zaobao.com/sp/sp100517_003.shtml

李资政3月接受《朝日新闻》专访: 美三五十年内仍能对亚太发挥影响力
(2010-05-17)​
<!-- /ssi/slice/imugroup01.shtml --> <style type="text/css"> fieldset { width: 309px; border: 1px solid #990000; } legend { font-family: Arial,"宋体"; font-size: 12px; font-weight: bold; color: #990000; }</style>  美国在今后三五十年,依然能对亚太地区发挥影响力,并且会保持充沛的活力,不断进行革新及吸引外来人才,以持续增强国力。  内阁资政李光耀认为因中国崛起而出现的所谓“后美国时代”,或许要在30年至50年后才会出现。因为中国在这之前无论是民用或军事科技,都比不上美国的水平,而中国市场的购买力也比不上美国。
  “虽然中国的人口较多,但人均收入还是偏低。即使30年后它的国内生产总值超越了美国,人均生产总值还是很低。而一个国家的实力涵盖着经济实力、军力和政治影响力。”
  他也认为美国的实力在短期内急剧下降的可能性不高。
   “我不认为美国在未来10年至30年,会丧失其革新与科技突破能力。人才不会去中国,而是会去美国,因为美国人讲英语,每个人都能融入。这个国家拥抱外 来移民,但是要在中国生活,你必须学好中文,熟悉中华文化,而这是很难克服的一道障碍。即使是新加坡的华人在中国做生意,也发觉自己要过一两年,才能适应 不同的生活方式和不同的想法。”
  李资政三月间在总统府接受日本《朝日新闻》总编辑船桥洋一专访,针对亚太区域局势与日本问题发表看法。《朝日新闻》英文版前天以全版刊登这次专访内容。它介绍李资政是世界上具顶尖智慧的政治领导人,并且形容他是世界“首席情报员”。
  在访谈中,他认为到了本世纪下半叶,当世界再分析两国的实力时,中美之间的科技差距也许会缩小,虽然中国的人均收入还是比美国低,但是14亿人口的总体资源将比美国多,并能把更多资源运用在政治与军事用途,而在增强国力之余,它也可在太平洋地区取得更加平衡的影响力。
   对于船桥洋一所提到的亚洲,包括东南亚人民,是否把美日安全关系视为一个稳定因素的问题,李资政答说:“这是肯定的。我个人也毫无疑问地认为这是一个 ‘稳定器’。而我也很肯定的是许多人虽然不会这么说,但是他们心里却是这么想的。我们说出来,是因为我们想让美国人和日本人更容易面对。”
  他指出,美国没给予新加坡任何援助,我们也不是一个卫星国,跟美国也没订立任何条约,只是允许美军以新加坡作为对海湾地区展开行动的后勤补给基地。
  至于维持势力平衡的结果,是否会演变成对中国的围堵政策的问题,李资政表示这样的假设不会出现。

“中国太大了,大到无可包围。日本或许能观察从上海以北开出的潜水艇,但你无法阻止潜水艇从海南岛开出来。我注意到中国在海南岛有座很大的潜水艇基地,而且每个人都知道,那可是个深水基地。所以,我不认为对中国的任何包围是行得通的。”  他指出,虽然中国的军力还无法和美国匹比,但却可对第七舰队造成巨大的破坏,而且能以潜水艇去击沉航空母舰。
   “事实上,我们也派出潜水艇和美国人举行海军演习,并且向他们显示我们也瞄准他们的航空母舰作为目标。所以,我想他们一定也考虑到这一点。显示军力不能 单靠航空母舰,他们必须要有基地,因此才有了在日本和泰国的基地。可惜苏比克湾的基地已经关闭了,这是菲律宾人的选择。但是,我想冲绳岛对他们来说,是个 重要的前进基地,比关岛更接近亚洲。”
  因此,他认为无论是对新加坡还是日本而言,维持现状是最为有利的。
  李资政也指出亚太地区将来不会是个多极化的地区,而是个两极化地区,日本属于美国这一极。因为日本无论是其经济、军事能力还是科技能力有多强大,但因人口规模小,不可能单独去平衡中国。
  对于日本首相鸠山由纪夫所提出的至今尚未清晰的东亚共同体概念,他表示本身宁可静观未来有何发展,包括日本的战略思想家是否会认为这符合日本的利益。
   当船桥洋一问他对这样的构想为何如此保留时,李资政答说:“单靠日本是无法抗衡中国的,如果你们和中国同在一个集团里,你们也是无法抗衡的。但是,如果 美国支持你们,还可以和中国讨价还价。没有美国的支持,你们将没筹码可玩。应该现实点,美国人不想让日本成为中国集团的一员,你们要么留在美国集团,要么 加入中国集团。”
  谈到亚细安,李资政表示他个人认为亚细安目前是比较倾向于美国,但是随着时日的推移,泰国、寮国、柬埔寨和缅甸等中南 半岛上的成员国都须考虑中国的观点,因为中国这个快速增长的经济体是它们的市场,它们向中国出口原材料和矿产。所以,亚细安内部的立场接下来将会出现变 化。
  “我想如果维持势力平衡,亚细安的群岛国家会感到更加自在。最终中国将会有自己的远洋舰队和航空母舰,这只是迟早的问题,无论是30年、40年或50年,必然会实现。所以如果有势力平衡,我们就有多点空间。”
  李资政表示亚细安如要继续在亚洲区域的势力架构中扮演主导角色,就须保持团结,而非分化。
 
Back
Top