• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

HDB 101 : What the PAP don't want you to know.

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Joined
Nov 24, 2008
Messages
23,298
Points
113
I find that just talking to people I know, even educated people like school principals and what not, they are totally ignorant about the way the HDB system works. Here are some myths and misconceptions. Please add to them.

1) "I bought my HDB flat"/"I own my HDB flat" - No you didn't and no you don't. You are a tenant, the the HDB is the landlord. Its says so in your contract. Than why did you just pay all that money for? What you have actually done is pre-paid your rent 99 years in advance, in one lump sum. That's why you have to borrow from the bank the $300K or whatever it is to move into your flat. So people, you are pre-paying your rent, not buying your flat. Get this concept first, than everything will fall into place.

2) If I don't own it, than how come I can sell my flat for a lot of money? - What you have sold is not your flat. In other words, the four walls, floor, toilet fixtures etc. do not belong to you. You cannot sell something that does not belong to you. What you have sold to someone else is the right to occupy your flat for the balance of the 99 years lease. Lets say that your flat is 15 years old, which means that you have 84 years left on your list. The person "buying" it is willing to pay you x amount of money for the right to occupy your flat for the next 84 years, and he therefore will enjoy the rights priveleges of your flat instead of you. You have in affect, assigned your flat to someone else, with the stipulation that he will take over all responsibility of the flat (like conveyancing fees, upgrade costs, etc.) in addition to paying you the assignment fee aka purchase price. Its similar to subletting. Because the HDB is your landlord, the HDB has to approve all "sales", as the new person taking over your flat is going to be their new tenant.

3) You are using your retirement income and funds to pay for your current living expenses - By enabling you to buy and pay for the monthly mortgage with your CPF, the PAP has in effect inflated the price of the flats, and forced the people into paying the inflated price by jeopardising their retirement for current living expenses. Most retirement advisors will tell you to pay for your cuurent living expenses with after tax dollars and from income that you are currently earning and not thru the use of funds earmarked for your retirement. But if people were to follow this retirement advise, they will find that their after tax dollars cannot buy too much. Hence, the PAP has allowed them to dip into their CPF account, and allowing to buy flats at an inflated price.

4) Than why do so many people use the CPF to "buy" flats? - People do this because they are ignorant and don't understand the concept of retirement funds and the real purpose of it. You can see many retired aunties and uncles working at menial jobs and barely able to make ends meet in the twilight of their lives. This is a time when they should have been enjoying their retirement and not wondering when the next meal will be. If they had not spend all their money from their CPF paying for their flats, would their lives be easier? The second reason why people use their CPF is because the PAP have set the interest rate so low for the CPF accounts that people actually are losing money in their account because the rate of inflation is higher than what they are getting paid. Even if you max out all the avenues in your CPF to get better returns than what the govt. pays you, you will still not be keeping up with inflation. If the PAP pays people 8%-18% per annum interest on their CPF accounts, much fewer people will be enticed to withdraw funds for the purposes of acquiring a HDB flat. Why do I mention 8%-18%, well this is what GIC, Temasek, and other GLCs ostensibly earn when they borrow money from CPF for their own investment, money that is actually yours. Consequently, people are forced into dipping into their CPF for HDB flats. It is important people understand this PAP tactic.

4)Well, I can sell my flat when I am old and retire on the money that I get - Yes, you could do that. But this is not the 70s and 80s anymore. The days of buying a $70,000 flat and selling it 25 years later for $400K are gone. There are many cases now of people losing money on their flats. And if you sell it, where would you live? Would you rent for the remaining years of your live? Would you downsize and buy a smaller and cheaper flat? Nowadays, its not unusual to purchase a $400K flat and still have to renovate it. If your flat ends up costing you $500K after reno and what not, how much do you have to sell it for 25 years later to make enough money to retire comfortably on? $1 million? The market for this price is iffy. And if you stay in the same flat for a long time, lets say 50 years or more, your flat will actually start to decline in value as the maturation of the leasehold period approaches. If you sell your flat at the highest point of its value, lets say in 10-20 years, where will you live? You will still need buy another flat at the new higher price to live in for the remaining 30 years of your life.

5) Is what I pay for this flat really all I pay? - The simple answer is no. If you pay x amount for the flat, you have to factor in the following:-
- Opportunity costs of foregone returns from your CPF that you have used on the flat.
- Mandatory HDB money making schemes like upgrades that will add to the capital cost of your flat. In every country in the world, if the building has deteriorated to the degree that upgrades are needed, its the landlord that bares the burden. In uniquely SIngapore, the tenants pay for it.
- Conservancy charges, that keep going up and not down.
- Possible forced relocation to another flat in a new estate because your block has now be taken over by the HDB for demolition/rental to FTs, etc. Forced relocation means you have to now pay additional money for the new flat they want you to move to, hence increasing your capital costs.

6) The long term consequence is a very expensive housing costs - If you look at many European and Asian countries like Japan, you will find that the same property stays in the same family for generations. Just imagine if a person owning a freehold property in another country can pass his property on to his son, and than the son pases it on his grandson, etc. over 3 generations. By the end of the 3rd generation, the property could be worth a lot of money. In the same scenario in S'pore, the property is worth nothing.

So, what is the solution? The main gist of the solution is to minimize your exposure to the HDB. Some solutions I can think of:
- Create 2 family households in a flat rather than one household. Kongsi with your siblings or parents and live in one flat.
- Rent from the HDB instead of "buying"
- Live in JB, commute to S'pore, after all 300K Malaysians do that every day.

The whole game is set up for the HDB/PAP to win. They have set the rules, but this thread is intended to educate the people as to what some of these rules are. It does not mean that you will win the game, but it helps to know what they are.
 
Last edited:
I find that just talking to people I know, even educated people like school principals and what not, they are totally ignorant about the way the HDB system works. Here are some myths and misconceptions. Please add to them.

...

The whole game is set up for the HDB/PAP to win. They have set the rules, but this thread is intended to educate the people as to what some of these rules are. It does not mean that you will win the game, but it helps to know what they are.

I'm speechless... I just up your points.
 
4) Than why do so many people use the CPF to "buy" flats? - People do this because they are ignorant and don't understand the concept of retirement funds and the real purpose of it. You can see many retired aunties and uncles working at menial jobs and barely able to make ends meet in the twilight of their lives. This is a time when they should have been enjoying their retirement and not wondering when the next meal will be. If they had not spend all their money from their CPF paying for their flats, would their lives be easier? The second reason why people use their CPF is because the PAP have set the interest rate so low for the CPF accounts that people actually are losing money in their account because the rate of inflation is higher than what they are getting paid. Even if you max out all the avenues in your CPF to get better returns than what the govt. pays you, you will still not be keeping up with inflation. If the PAP pays people 8%-18% per annum interest on their CPF accounts, much fewer people will be enticed to withdraw funds for the purposes of acquiring a HDB flat. Why do I mention 8%-18%, well this is what GIC, Temasek, and other GLCs ostensibly earn when they borrow money from CPF for their own investment, money that is actually yours. Consequently, people are forced into dipping into their CPF for HDB flats. It is important people understand this PAP tactic.

The reason why people use their CPF is because the CPF cannot be used for anything else like say paying for private home rentals. After all "owning" a HDB is essentially the same as renting any other home.

By unlocking CPF and allowing it to pay for HDBs and properties, liquidity is fueled and results in asset bubbles.

And yes, CPF funds are simply moved from your pockets into Temasek or GIC's.
 
good that this is brought up once again. for the longest time in the old SBF in Delphi, a number of bros and myself have been bringing up these things all along... :p
 
The REAL reason why people use their CPF funds to pay for their mortgages is because there is no other way for them to pay the exorbitant prices.

Without the CPF, more than half the population will be staying on the streets.

The PAP has enslaved a large portion of the population and these people have no retirement savings which was what the CPF was meant to be.
 
The REAL reason why people use their CPF funds to pay for their mortgages is because there is no other way for them to pay the exorbitant prices.

Without the CPF, more than half the population will be staying on the streets.

The PAP has enslaved a large portion of the population and these people have no retirement savings which was what the CPF was meant to be.

CPF, HDB, SAF... the 3 claws that keeps the citizens in check :p:p:p
 
Papsmearer, tks for the post. To expand on it, it is actually the land on which the blocks are built that is not 'owned' when a person buys an HDB flat. He gets to own only the flat; indeed a hole in the sky. Properties in Singapore are built on either leasehold or freehold land. Leasehold land props comes in 99 or 999 yrs. Freehold land props means owners possess them for perpetuity; there is no limit to years held. Private condos can be on leasehold usually 999 or freehold, with the latter of course being priced higher. Same with landed property.

Altho the leases on most props are 99 years, people actually buy and sell without thinking abt it too much. Here I may not agree with Papsmearer that 'owners' don't know that for a fact. 99 yrs is a long time anyway, and of course, it means at the end of 99 yrs, the land and everything on it reverts back to the title holder, which in this case, is SLA and not HDB anyway. HDB leased the land from SLA and then HDB developed the land by building flats on it and sells them out. Private developers buy land from URA who leased it from SLA too. SLA is thereal landowner on behalf of the govt. SLA leases land to JTC for commercial and industrial uses.

In any case, usually long before the land lease runs down to its 99th year, say after 20 years, there will be developers who may want to buy the land to redevelop it. That is where the en bloc concept was born. Knock the existing houses/apartments down and rebuild to usually higher approved plot ratios and resell at a good profit. Banks are prepared to give out a mortgage loan if the lease is not less than 60 years left. Maybe this is where resellers and buyers of resale props got to be aware. Hope that helps.
 
Good write up. I personally use my CPF to fund my home because i've actually written it off. My prediction is that its actually going to get harder and harder to 'withdraw' the money come retirement so i think of my 20% contribution as some kind of tax that i will never see again.
 
...................................................................................................
So, what is the solution? ...........

To me its to vote them out of power.

The opposition this round should take on all the Ministers and even if they do not win the election but managed to kick out some Ministers-the message will be loud and clear.
They should focus on taking on the MM/SM's/DPM's and people like MBT/WKS/LSS -those who have made Singaporeans life miserable.

By the way, this is a good thread with many good suggestions by the threadstarter.
 
So, what is the solution? The main gist of the solution is to minimize your exposure to the HDB. Some solutions I can think of:
- Create 2 family households in a flat rather than one household. Kongsi with your siblings or parents and live in one flat.
- Rent from the HDB instead of "buying"
- Live in JB, commute to S'pore, after all 300K Malaysians do that every day.

1. If things are as simple, then we will have world peace. Human to human interfaces make it hard to have many people under 1 household. People need personal space for their own interests.

2. Rent from HDB? You mean renting a flat from the open market or those subsidised rental flats from HDB?

3. Talk is cheap, walk the talk. How about those households with school going kids?
 
05-02-2010, 11:44 AM
Highfalutin
Alfrescian Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 369
My Reputation:Points: 65 / Power: 9


Re: HDB prices and future generation

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Very soon, multi generation family living under one roof will not be a sign of filial piety but neccessity out of pressured circumstances.
 
Renting is not a good idea in the long run! You can't use yr CPF to pay for yr rentals. Since you can't take out the CPF before retirement age, you might as well use yr CPF to buy the HDB flat. That is not wrong, as it benefits you and not HDB.
If you rent from HDB, at the end of it all, you definitely do not have possession of anything and you will regret! If you pay off with CPF, you can at least have something (even if you dont own it in yr true sense of the word) to resell at a profit after x yrs. Especially, you shld try to use yr CPF as much as poss when you are still young. When you are old, it's better to rent (since you don't have much time left on this planet anyway).

If you want to rent short term to wait for the prop mkt to burst before you go in to buy, then ok, it's makes sense.


So, what is the solution?
- Rent from the HDB instead of "buying"
 
I am paying off a 30 year $90,000 HDB loan on a monthly repayment of $350. I consider that as rent. A rental scheme whereby I have to pay an upfront of $80,000! I consider myself lucky because if I were to do it all over again now, it will be $180,000 for the same rental $350! How's that for perspective? I got the loan four years ago. The rental payment will be taken over by my children when I'm gone.
 
Renting is not a good idea! You can't use yr CPF to pay for yr rentals. Since you can't take out the CPF before retirement age, you might as well use yr CPF to buy the HDB flat. That is not wrong, as it benefits you and not HDB.
If you rent from HDB, at the end of it all, you definitely do not have possession of anything and you will regret! If you pay off with CPF, you can at least have something (even if you dont own it in yr true sense of the word) to resell at a profit after x yrs. Especially, you shld try to use yr CPF as much as poss when you are still young. When you are old, it's better to rent (since you don't have much time left on this planet anyway).

To add to the above. Yes, please use your CPF to buy a ppty.
If you leave your money in your CPF, how much interest can you earn?
You will be making a much better "interest" by investing in a ppty.

I have this view, most of us are not finance people or professional speculator. We don't know how to/what to invest in, using our CPF to generate enough investment gains to counter inflation. So I do hope that the Gov't (since they should be better at investing than normal Singaporeans) could invest our CPF in less prudence investment to generate higher interest.

In other countries that uses a "Defined Benefit Plan", Companies are responsible to invest their employees "CPF" to generate enough investment gains to counter inflation.
 
If you want to rent short term to wait for the prop mkt to burst before you go in to buy, then ok, it's makes sense.

:p:p:p want to rent directly from HDB? not viable for some folks and i quote from the HDB website:

eligibility of HDB rentals
applicant must be Singaporean above 21 years of age and total household gross income must not exceed SGD$1500.00

source: http://www.hdb.gov.sg/fi10/fi10323p.nsf/w/RentDirectHDBEligibility?OpenDocument

looks like folks can only rent from current HDB flat "owners"... very interesting :D:D:D
 
The reason why people use their CPF is because the CPF cannot be used for anything else like say paying for private home rentals. After all "owning" a HDB is essentially the same as renting any other home.

By unlocking CPF and allowing it to pay for HDBs and properties, liquidity is fueled and results in asset bubbles.

And yes, CPF funds are simply moved from your pockets into Temasek or GIC's.

Yes, this is exactly my point number 4. The PAP have certainly opened the floodgates on liquidity when they allow for the use of CPF with regards to HDB transactions. Imagine if the PAP say no to using CPF for HDB, I can tell you the price will plummet overnight. Almost no country in the world allow the citizen's retirement funds to be used to this large a degree and for pre-paid rent. If you look at retirement funds around the world like IRAs, Keoughs, RRSPs etc, real estate is not even allowed. In the case of some like the Canadian RRSP, you are capped at $20K, and you have to pay back within 10 years. This is PAP theft on an unprecedented scale.
 
good that this is brought up once again. for the longest time in the old SBF in Delphi, a number of bros and myself have been bringing up these things all along... :p

Yes, happy CNY to u
 
The REAL reason why people use their CPF funds to pay for their mortgages is because there is no other way for them to pay the exorbitant prices.

Without the CPF, more than half the population will be staying on the streets.

The PAP has enslaved a large portion of the population and these people have no retirement savings which was what the CPF was meant to be.

This is really a catch 22 situation, isn't it? By using their CPF funds, the people are inadvertently raising the price of the flats to exorbitant levels. The reason is they don't understand the liquidity issue. Just imagine, if people were to be self discipline and say "Ok, my CPF is for retirement, I will not use it to "buy" a flat", I guarantee you tomorrow, the flat price will drop like a stone. The HDB can charge all they want, but no one will buy.
With regards to the population living on the streets, I don't agree. They can stay with their parents, family, or rent. If they can, they could buy private freehold. There are still options.
 
Papsmearer, tks for the post. To expand on it, it is actually the land on which the blocks are built that is not 'owned' when a person buys an HDB flat. He gets to own only the flat; indeed a hole in the sky. Properties in Singapore are built on either leasehold or freehold land. Leasehold land props comes in 99 or 999 yrs. Freehold land props means owners possess them for perpetuity; there is no limit to years held. Private condos can be on leasehold usually 999 or freehold, with the latter of course being priced higher. Same with landed property.

Kingrant, I have to disagree with you on this point. If you look at the HDB contract, you will see that you are referred to always as the tenant, and the HDB is the landlord. The legal implication of this is that you don't even own the flat i.e. the 4 walls, toilet, floor, etc. This is why you can be easily forced to vacate your flat if you break one of the many HDB rules and regulations. This is also why you cannot suka suka do any extension or drastic reno to your flat. If you truly own the physical flat, you should be able to do that. No where on the contract does it say you own the physical portion.

Altho the leases on most props are 99 years, people actually buy and sell without thinking abt it too much. Here I may not agree with Papsmearer that 'owners' don't know that for a fact. 99 yrs is a long time anyway, and of course, it means at the end of 99 yrs, the land and everything on it reverts back to the title holder, which in this case, is SLA and not HDB anyway. HDB leased the land from SLA and then HDB developed the land by building flats on it and sells them out. Private developers buy land from URA who leased it from SLA too. SLA is thereal landowner on behalf of the govt. SLA leases land to JTC for commercial and industrial uses.

When people buy and sell, they don't really know or understand that they are buying and selling the the pre-paid right to use the remainder of the lease for that particular unit, and not the actual physical assets or land. Its actually a piece of paper they are buying, i.e. the rental agreement with HDB

In any case, usually long before the land lease runs down to its 99th year, say after 20 years, there will be developers who may want to buy the land to redevelop it. That is where the en bloc concept was born. Knock the existing houses/apartments down and rebuild to usually higher approved plot ratios and resell at a good profit. Banks are prepared to give out a mortgage loan if the lease is not less than 60 years left. Maybe this is where resellers and buyers of resale props got to be aware. Hope that helps.

Again the jury is out on this. As you are aware, en blocs are very acrimonius proportions, with alot of lawsuits, counterlawsuits, etc. going on. Witness the Horizon Towers situation. The only people that win are lawyers because they earn so much fees. It breeds speculators who come into your block and bid up the price. If you don't want to sell, too bad for you. I can tell you that far more blocks have been knocked down by the HDB (rather than by developers) because they miscalculated the density ratio on the plot and because they want to make the profits themselves. Waiting and praying that you will be en bloc is not the way to go. As I mention in point number 4, if you stay in your flat long term lets say for 50 years, the value will fall because as you have mentioned, the banks will not finance a lease that has less than 50 years left.
 
Back
Top