• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Your money worries and your democratic rights

metalslug

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Aug 8, 2008
Messages
3,619
Points
0
http://yoursdp.org/index.php/news/singapore/4881-your-money-worries-and-your-democratic-rights

Your money worries and your democratic rights
Wednesday, 29 June 2011
Singapore Democrats

benn.jpg


The SDP has long argued that democratic rights, which include the right to a genuinely free and fair election system where people choose their governments, is fundamental to our ability to safeguard our economic interests.

In other words in order to have a meaningful discussion on bread-and-butter issues and, more important, compel the PAP to carry out the people's wishes on such matters, requires first and foremost the ability of citizens to sack the government if they deem it necessary.

When it comes to the vote, the election system here is anything but free and fair. The PAP tolerates the electorate's right to vote in their parliamentary representatives up to a point beyond which they will change the constitution such as introducing the infamous GRC system or making the campaign period impossibly short or intimidating voters through HDB upgrading projects to keep themselves firmly in power.

The upcoming presidential elections is another case in point where candidates have to meet a criteria drawn up to ensure that only a few people qualify. The PAP will then step in a decide which of these persons can contest the position.

The entire system is designed with one thing in mind: That the PAP has the sole right to political power in Singapore and the elections are to ensure that this remains the case even as the opposition is given token roles.

Apart from the right to freely choose our government, democracy also necessitates the people's freedom to express their opinions and to assemble peacefully to articulate their opinions. It is because Singaporeans do not have these freedoms that the PAP is able to manage the election system to ensure a specific outcome.

This is why after the elections, nothing has changed. Save for the musical chairs played in the cabinet everything else has stayed the same: HDB pricing-policy remains, the cost of living continues to go skyward, and our financial reserves are still managed in a non-transparent manner.

Why? Because while we are given the illusion that we practice democracy in Singapore, we have been managed as a electorate to think and accept that the system that benefits the PAP is actually good for Singapore and Singaporeans. The control of SPH and MediaCorps is done with one and only one objective, to numb the thinking process of the people into accepting the status quo.

All this has one important consequence: While the rich and the powerful continue to enjoy immensely wealth, ordinary Singaporeans are put under tremendous strain from daily pressures just to make ends meet. This, in turn, affects our psychological and physical health. And what is happiness without health?

To add insult the Government treats healthcare like a commodity where the medical industry is run like any profit-making enterprise. As a result, the rich get treated with more urgency and greater care while the poor are left without adequate medial attention.

Below is a clip of an interview that filmmaker Mr Michael Moore did with long-time Labour MP and social activist Mr Tony Benn who talks about the need for democratic rights to secure our economic security so that we can lead secure and meaningful lives.

<iframe width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/37wkX2gklzo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
It's Not Going To Work

liberty.jpg



I think the ballot boxes are NOT going to work here. Everyone shuns this issue - Revolution. The younger generation mass can topple an old 80 yo man who can't even walk and talk properly. And the funny thing is : everyone is afraid of AN OLD MAN. That's funny part ! Where are the balls ?
 
Re: It's Not Going To Work

liberty.jpg



I think the ballot boxes are NOT going to work here. Everyone shuns this issue - Revolution. The younger generation mass can topple an old 80 yo man who can't even walk and talk properly. And the funny thing is : everyone is afraid of AN OLD MAN. That's funny part ! Where are the balls ?

The difficulty of convincing sillyporeans that OLD MAN and gang should be deposed lest they will be strangers in their own land. In fact it had already happened.:mad:
 
Re: It's Not Going To Work

Just to sidetrack, i love those fat tits!!! :D:D:D
 
I urge Singaporeans to learn and be clear about Rights & Ability, or the rather Rights vs Ability.

Confusion between the 2 is very bad.

Rights is a logical matter, Ability is a physical. Difference is big here.

If you are on your death bed, lost 99% of your ability, you will still have 100% of your rights as long as the rest in this world still respect your rights. You would even have your rights as a DEAD MAN totally with zero ability, as long as the others would uphold your rights for you.

If you had your physical Ability to enforce and guard your what is rightfully yours, it is a very different thing, because you don't need to depend on any others to uphold your own Rights, and if any of them violated your Rights, you physically put them to the places they belong.;)

As activists we help people by inspiring them and encouraging them to acquire their physical Abilities to empower themselves, to guard their own logical rights.

When people's Rights had been violated and compromised / undermined, helplessly, that means they lack the ability to uphold and guard their own Rights, or defending against the violators.

Hence talking about Rights in these cases is just merely Account the amount of losses suffered at the most, if you just merely talk about Rights. By that we know that the violators will only continue to exploit, unless your talks alone can stop them via embarrassment. If that is the case it is too easy, and these lucky people don't really need any activists to do anything.

In most cases, if you really want to Reclaim the losses suffered, you really need quite some Physical Ability, that is whatever form of Damages, Pressure, Pain, Losses, Distress, Hurt, Death etc you can cause to the violators to defend your violated Rights.

Talks are cheap. And most likely not very helpful.

Because in the 1st place the violators did not accidentally violated people rights, they calculated and prepared and intentionally / purposefully did it.

;):eek::mad:

They neglected and disrespected and violated the people's right for their own gains, in most cases.

If Singaporeans had absolutely no Ability to inflict something wonderful on the LEEgime, you think Ass Loong Son will apologize like he did in GE2011. You really think so?
:rolleyes::rolleyes:

I strongly believe otherwise. ;):p
 
if chee soon juan could come clean with singaporeans, SDP would be more credible. but since he has already constructed such a nefarious image of himself, SDP's word can not be taken seriously at par value. we must look at their behind for parangs, slime juices, poison darts and all the stuffs fraudsters like chee is good at :(
 
【权】 与 【 能】


绝对有必要清楚的认知两者的分别和作用。

两者绝对不相等,搞错了搞混了,麻烦就可以很大。;)

【权】仅是人为的逻辑性存在的。 只有人为的承认和维护它,它才存在。它人为的存在也可以人为的消逝,或者人为的被改变(增/减/扩/缩)。

决定的人为因素通常包括:法律;宗教;信念;政治理论;学术理论。。等等。 皆为人为因素。

【 能】必须是实体的;实践性;物理性的存在的。必须有实际的效果。而非理论性;逻辑性;或凭空想像的。空谈不能包括在这里面。;)

例如老虎有力吃掉你。但它未必有这样做。:D
老虎吃你的时候,你有权自卫。但是你未必有能力做到;)

因为【权】是人为存在的,老虎它当然就是不懂,它不懂得人为的东西嘛。
老虎它有的是【 能】而,你知道你有自卫【权】,因为你被人为的教育了,你知道其他会承认/支持你的自卫【权】

如果老虎被你关在笼子里面了。你可能会要把它送到餐桌上尝一尝,你可能有这个【能】力。但是,你未必有【权】这样做。你可以争议自己有【权】,但是这要看地方的法律。各地方的法律不相同,这完全是人为的因素。这不影响你的【能】力。你有本事把虎烹吃了,不管法律是否允许。你本事大些,执法的人不知道你把虎烹吃了。你本事再大些,执法的人即使知道你把虎烹吃了也告不了你。你本事再更大些,你把法律改了!:eek:;):D

这就是你自己的【 能】的分别。只有实践性的【能】力,才能改变人为的【权】。空谈无用。


【权】是人为的所有可以争论不休,没完没了。人的看法无法一致,这问题当然没完没了。

【 能】
的实践性就很直接了当。马上实践证明就完了。到底是老虎吃你还是你吃它,很快就有答案。老虎饿了吃你,5分钟下肚子,几小时後消化拉屎。你就变成虎粪了。活不回来了。跟理论分别巨大。你把老虎烹吃了可能1或2小时。同样会消化拉屎。煮不卫生的话,你拉肚子。老虎吃你多数不拉肚子。因为它的适应消化能力和你不同。这是【 能】的分别。

吃下去就么有什么子争论啦。

:D;)
 
Logically and theoretically Aung San Suu Kyi has Rights to be candidate and freedom etc....

Practically? Junta forfeited almost all of her Rights! Has she got the Ability to restore her own Rights? Then can she help her people whose Rights had been compromised?

:rolleyes:

Did the Ang Mohs uphold her Rights or used her as a chip to play with the Junta?

Practically, what kind of price need to be paid by Burmese people to regain their Rights, can they afford? Their Ability would surely come at a price.

Thais are paying their prices.

Abhisit had the Rights to order the quite reluctant army, Red Shirts asserted their Rights too, they never agreed. They all paid their prices, and after sufficient transactions of that, things would settle and rest, and then will come Peace. Natural peace instead of arbitrary.

In physics that is a state of stability after all the due energies had been discharged and spent.

Chinese word of Energy = 【能】。
;)
 
Last edited:
In physics that is a state of stability after all the due energies had been discharged and spent.

Chinese word of Energy = 【能】。
;)

Fucking clown Yap, show me your equation that proves that entropy is zero after energy has been expended in the real world. Then you talk to limpeh me physics theory!

Better you shaddap lah!



6sfas1.jpg

 
Fucking clown Yap, show me your equation that proves that entropy is zero after energy has been expended in the real world. Then you talk to limpeh me physics theory!

Better you shaddap lah!


You don't deserve any attention. Be unhappy all you want. Don't expect me to be concerned.;)
 
You don't deserve any attention. Be unhappy all you want. Don't expect me to be concerned.;)

Then still reply me somemore?

What an absolute utter Dumbfuck!
 
Back
Top