• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Reminder on Socialist Front's Public Forum (SAT) Tomorrow

uncleyap

uncleyap

Alfrescian
Loyal
Joined
Jul 11, 2008
Messages
5,769
Points
48
Relay a message from Mr. Ng Teck Siong regarding this public forum:

Socialist Front

Press Notice

Invitation to Socialist Front’s First Public Forum

The Socialist Front will hold its first public forum on the topic of the “Rule of Law, what is your role?”

Date: Saturday 4th December, 2010

Time: 3 p.m. to 6 p.m.

Location: Post-Museum, l07 Rowell Road

Singapore 208031

The panel of speakers at the forum will include the following:
Ng Teck Siong, Chairman SF
Ng Pian Ying, Committee Member, SF
Dr. Chee Soon Juan, Secretary-General, SDP
Mr. Leong Sze Hian, President, Society for Financial Services Professionals
All Singaporeans are invited to attend this discussion on the Rule of Law and good governance as opposed to the Rule of Man or Rule by Law. You can share contribute your views on how Singapore should be governed.
This forum is open to all Singaporeans.
Ng Teck Siong, Chairman
 
What a joke! We're living in the 21st century and there are still jokers pining for the failed system that is socialism. :mad:
 
Cruxx said:
What a joke! We're living in the 21st century and there are still jokers pining for the failed system that is socialism. :mad:
Click to expand...

I just remind you also that Old Dog Thief LKy had faked to be a Socialist in order to come to power....;)
 
Cruxx said:
What a joke! We're living in the 21st century and there are still jokers pining for the failed system that is socialism. :mad:
Click to expand...

uncleyap said:
I just remind you also that Old Dog Thief LKy had faked to be a Socialist in order to come to power....;)
Click to expand...

I don't think that's a good reply. You imply that new socialists are following suit and faking it to win, then discard it after winning.
 
Cruxx said:
What a joke! We're living in the 21st century and there are still jokers pining for the failed system that is socialism. :mad:
Click to expand...

When you are set on fire by PAP, do you still care which water you prefer to jump in. Even in your presumpton the water is black and dirty, do you have other choice to save your life.
 
Ramseth said:
I don't think that's a good reply. You imply that new socialists are following suit and faking it to win, then discard it after winning.
Click to expand...
:eek:
I never guessed that you can find such an interpretation. :confused::p
 
Ramseth said:
I don't think that's a good reply. You imply that new socialists are following suit and faking it to win, then discard it after winning.
Click to expand...

Hear, hear! It's also a red herring too. I don quite see how LKY being a "fake socialist" validates the case for socialism. :confused:
 
Rogue Trader said:
Socialism is just too deep for idiots.
Click to expand...

What a "deep" response. :rolleyes:

myfoot123 said:
When you are set on fire by PAP, do you still care which water you prefer to jump in. Even in your presumpton the water is black and dirty, do you have other choice to save your life.
Click to expand...

You mean all anti-PAP advocates are socialists? I hold the PAPpies in the highest contempt yet I'm more capitalist that these capitalists could ever be. And I'm sure many Sinkies think likewise.
 
Socialism????:rolleyes:

No natural resources, no high technology companies, no inventions, no patents, no fortune 100 companies and you have a bunch of sinkie peasants. :D

How are you going to support the expenditures? :oIo:

Bunch of losers. :oIo:
 
Rogue Trader said:
Socialism is just too deep for idiots.
Click to expand...

if singapore is a full socialist state, none of us will be typing here.

In socialism, The Rule of Law does not exist. What exist is the benefit of the society overall and any law of rule or any kind has no individual character apart from private living.

If Barisan want to really be socialist, they better show and preach actual socialist idea and not tyry to throw in something like Rule of Law as it was never part of the socialist intention.

Anyay, if any of these parties do care about Rule of Law, first thing is to respect the law and quit act against it. If you dont even respect the rule, then how can you claim to fight for Rule of law?
 
cleareyes said:
if singapore is a full socialist state, none of us will be typing here.

In socialism, The Rule of Law does not exist. What exist is the benefit of the society overall and any law of rule or any kind has no individual character apart from private living.

If Barisan want to really be socialist, they better show and preach actual socialist idea and not tyry to throw in something like Rule of Law as it was never part of the socialist intention.

Anyay, if any of these parties do care about Rule of Law, first thing is to respect the law and quit act against it. If you dont even respect the rule, then how can you claim to fight for Rule of law?
Click to expand...


SILLY?

LKy Old Dog Thief's LEEgime is an Implementation of His Own Socialism.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

Some currents of socialism advocate complete nationalisation of the means of production, distribution, and exchange, while others advocate state control of capital within the framework of a market economy. Socialists<sup style="white-space: nowrap;" title="The material in the vicinity of this tag may use weasel words or too-vague attribution. from November 2010" class="noprint Inline-Template">[who?]</sup> inspired by the Soviet model of economic development have advocated the creation of centrally planned economies directed by a state that owns all the means of production. Others, including Yugoslavian, Hungarian, East German and Chinese communist governments in the 1970s and 1980s, instituted various forms of market socialism<sup style="white-space: nowrap;" title="This claim needs references to reliable sources from November 2010" class="Template-Fact">[citation needed]</sup>, combining co-operative and state ownership models with the free market exchange and free price system (but not free prices for the means of production).<sup class="reference" id="cite_ref-10">[11]</sup>
Click to expand...

Is PAp being his own version of Communist Party. Is state-owned everything starting from GIC Temasek CPFB HDB SAF mata CUNT PA MediaCorpse SPH MOE (schools) NTU NUS SGH NUH KKH StingTel StarSuck Kangaroo-Cock Sinkapore-Teck-no-logy DBS/POSB/Tat-Lee Kappel SMRT SBS all bloody GIC GLC... are state-owned state-controlled like the Soviet's.

His social system based on CPF-HDB-NSF are socialism mechanisms, his GST-rebate etc are also part of it all.

You live in it and you had no idea?

:eek::D:rolleyes:;)
 
I don't think it matters what ideology a party believes in. As long as Yap is involved it will go under real quick. Watch this space.
 
scroobal said:
I don't think it matters what ideology a party believes in. As long as Yap is involved it will go under real quick. Watch this space.
Click to expand...

Yap is a retard

Have you seen his political talk show?

Steven Lim is much more entertaining than this mental guy
 
Rule of Law - What is Your Role?

I don't think any of the speakers are qualified to speak on the topic they chose. Similar to having laymen speak on something concerning medicine, diseases etc.

Agree with scroobal. When uncleyap appears, tragedy arrives.
 
Socialism is not the same as social security. The question in Singapore now is the adequacy of social security given the income disparity. Socialism can go to hell for all I care. Remember USSR? It stands for Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
 
Ramseth said:
Socialism is not the same as social security. The question in Singapore now is the adequacy of social security given the income disparity. Socialism can go to hell for all I care. Remember USSR? It stands for Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
Click to expand...

Income disparity????

Hello, you draw this conclusion from what data? Quote some figures before you sprout nonsense. I bet you will quote the GINI coefficient but before you do that, find out what figures they are using for their research :oIo:

So you expect the rich to give half their money to the peasants, who are visiting prostitutes and casinos on their days off instead of starting their own business?

Typical bullshit from someone with only O levels.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

JohnTan
Serious PAP Declares NTUC To Be A Political Significant Person! Guess Why?
Replies
10
Views
896
myfoot123
M
LaoHongBiscuit
Singapore’s ‘fake news’ fixer risks undermining public confidence
Replies
1
Views
970
SinkieExile
SinkieExile
P
Serious Even AMDKs agreed Sinkes are in GOOD HANDS unlike USA/UK!
Replies
6
Views
637
glockman
glockman
duluxe
Epoch Times: The Communist Roots of Islamic Terrorism & Extremism
Replies
1
Views
1K
laksaboy
laksaboy
SBFNews
‘Not recommended’ reading: The books Hong Kong is purging from public libraries
Replies
1
Views
959
blackmondy
blackmondy
Back
Top