-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Thrump can be new Putin video: I shoot some one @5th Ave won't lose vote!
- Thread starter nkfnkfnkf
- Start date
In the current global screnario of resources shortage environmental ruins and extreme over population. A True leadership must be capable of ELIMINATION of huge amount of people rather than convincing them, since you will NEVER find resources to keep them alive. Even if you had them loyally convinced to following you, most of them will be just burdens to your success.
He is a billionaire and he has no special interest group to donate to his campaign. totally self-funded..
so those oil , medical, cancer causing companies cannot touch him.
This is the best person to be president.
only those poor fuck losers like those PAP low life need the money to survive so have to be politically correct.
This one also billionaire:
Time for some billionaires to do something extraordinary. USA needs Hitler / Stalin, actually someone 1000X stronger than the sum of (Hitler plus Stalin).
Don't be an idiot. He was talking about his critics saying that his supporters are so strongly committed to him that he can do no wrong. Listen to his whole speech and not cut and paste out of context.
[video=youtube;rMmiLWDpCno]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMmiLWDpCno[/video]
[video=youtube;rMmiLWDpCno]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMmiLWDpCno[/video]
if can not count on Chairman Kim, nor Putin, nor Thrump, nor Xijinping...
Eventually planet earth will need to depend on robots to automatically mass cull the excessive human populations as man are too useless to carry out the necessary:
http://www.news24.com/Green/News/scientists-urge-world-to-stop-killer-robots-20160122-2
Scientists urge world to stop killer robots
2016-01-24 10:30
Drone. (AFP)
Drone. (AFP)
Multimedia · User Galleries · News in Pictures Send us your pictures · Send us your stories
Related Links
Tokyo police launch drone squad
Australia to use drones to track sharks from the air
South Sudan opposes drones for peace mission
Davos - The world must act quickly to avert a future in which autonomous robots with artificial intelligence roam the battlefields killing humans, scientists and arms experts warned at an elite gathering in the Swiss Alps.
Rules must be agreed to prevent the development of such weapons, they said at a January 19-23 meeting of billionaires, scientists and political leaders in the snow-covered ski resort of Davos.
Angela Kane, the German UN High Representative for Disarmament Affairs from 2012-2015, said the world had been slow to take pre-emptive measures to protect humanity from the lethal technology.
"It may be too late," she told a debate in Davos.
"There are many countries and many representatives in the international community that really do not understand what is involved. This development is something that is limited to a certain number of advanced countries," Kane said.
The deployment of autonomous weapons would represent a dangerous new era in warfare, scientists said.
"We are not talking about drones, where a human pilot is controlling the drone," said Stuart Russell, professor of computer science at University of California, Berkeley.
"We are talking about autonomous weapons, which means that there is no one behind it. AI: artificial intelligence weapons," he told a forum in Davos. "Very precisely, weapons that can locate and attack targets without human intervention."
Robot chaos on battlefield
Russell said he did not foresee a day in which robots fight the wars for humans and at the end of the day one side says: "OK you won, so you can have all our women."
But some 1,000 science and technology chiefs including British physicist Stephen Hawking, said in an open letter last July that the development of weapons with a degree of autonomous decision-making capacity could be feasible within years, not decades.
They called for a ban on offensive autonomous weapons that are beyond meaningful human control, warning that the world risked sliding into an artificial intelligence arms race and raising alarm over the risks of such weapons falling into the hands of violent extremists.
"The question is can these machines follow the rules of war?" Russell said.
'Beyond comprehension'
How, for an example, could an autonomous weapon differentiate between civilians, soldiers, resistance fighters and rebels? How could it know that it should not kill a pilot who has ejected from a plane and is parachuting to the ground?
"I am against robots for ethical reasons but I do not believe ethical arguments will win the day. I believe strategic arguments will win the day," Russell said.
The United States had renounced biological weapons because of the risk that one day they could deployed by "almost anybody", he said. "I hope this will happen with robots."
Alan Winfield, professor of electronic engineering at the University of the West of England, warned that removing humans from battlefield decision-making would have grave consequences.
"It means that humans are deprived from moral responsibility," Winfield said.
Moreover, the reaction of the robots may be hard to predict, he said: "When you put a robot in a chaotic environment, it behaves chaotically."
Roger Carr, chairman of the British aerospace and defence group BAE, agreed.
"If you remove ethics and judgement and morality from human endeavour whether it is in peace or war, you will take humanity to another level which is beyond our comprehension," Carr warned.
"You equally cannot put something into the field that, if it malfunctions, can be very destructive with no control mechanism from a human. That is why the umbilical link, man to machine, is not only to decide when to deploy the weapon but it is also the ability to stop the process. Both are equally important."
Eventually planet earth will need to depend on robots to automatically mass cull the excessive human populations as man are too useless to carry out the necessary:
http://www.news24.com/Green/News/scientists-urge-world-to-stop-killer-robots-20160122-2
Scientists urge world to stop killer robots
2016-01-24 10:30
Drone. (AFP)
Drone. (AFP)
Multimedia · User Galleries · News in Pictures Send us your pictures · Send us your stories
Related Links
Tokyo police launch drone squad
Australia to use drones to track sharks from the air
South Sudan opposes drones for peace mission
Davos - The world must act quickly to avert a future in which autonomous robots with artificial intelligence roam the battlefields killing humans, scientists and arms experts warned at an elite gathering in the Swiss Alps.
Rules must be agreed to prevent the development of such weapons, they said at a January 19-23 meeting of billionaires, scientists and political leaders in the snow-covered ski resort of Davos.
Angela Kane, the German UN High Representative for Disarmament Affairs from 2012-2015, said the world had been slow to take pre-emptive measures to protect humanity from the lethal technology.
"It may be too late," she told a debate in Davos.
"There are many countries and many representatives in the international community that really do not understand what is involved. This development is something that is limited to a certain number of advanced countries," Kane said.
The deployment of autonomous weapons would represent a dangerous new era in warfare, scientists said.
"We are not talking about drones, where a human pilot is controlling the drone," said Stuart Russell, professor of computer science at University of California, Berkeley.
"We are talking about autonomous weapons, which means that there is no one behind it. AI: artificial intelligence weapons," he told a forum in Davos. "Very precisely, weapons that can locate and attack targets without human intervention."
Robot chaos on battlefield
Russell said he did not foresee a day in which robots fight the wars for humans and at the end of the day one side says: "OK you won, so you can have all our women."
But some 1,000 science and technology chiefs including British physicist Stephen Hawking, said in an open letter last July that the development of weapons with a degree of autonomous decision-making capacity could be feasible within years, not decades.
They called for a ban on offensive autonomous weapons that are beyond meaningful human control, warning that the world risked sliding into an artificial intelligence arms race and raising alarm over the risks of such weapons falling into the hands of violent extremists.
"The question is can these machines follow the rules of war?" Russell said.
'Beyond comprehension'
How, for an example, could an autonomous weapon differentiate between civilians, soldiers, resistance fighters and rebels? How could it know that it should not kill a pilot who has ejected from a plane and is parachuting to the ground?
"I am against robots for ethical reasons but I do not believe ethical arguments will win the day. I believe strategic arguments will win the day," Russell said.
The United States had renounced biological weapons because of the risk that one day they could deployed by "almost anybody", he said. "I hope this will happen with robots."
Alan Winfield, professor of electronic engineering at the University of the West of England, warned that removing humans from battlefield decision-making would have grave consequences.
"It means that humans are deprived from moral responsibility," Winfield said.
Moreover, the reaction of the robots may be hard to predict, he said: "When you put a robot in a chaotic environment, it behaves chaotically."
Roger Carr, chairman of the British aerospace and defence group BAE, agreed.
"If you remove ethics and judgement and morality from human endeavour whether it is in peace or war, you will take humanity to another level which is beyond our comprehension," Carr warned.
"You equally cannot put something into the field that, if it malfunctions, can be very destructive with no control mechanism from a human. That is why the umbilical link, man to machine, is not only to decide when to deploy the weapon but it is also the ability to stop the process. Both are equally important."
http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/vladimir-putin-just-made-a-massive-donald-trump-announcement/
Vladimir Putin Just Made A MASSIVE Donald Trump Announcement!
By Kosar
Putin
There are plenty of reasons to disagree with Russian leader Vladimir Putin. But unlike President Barack Obama, we know EXACTLY where Putin stands on the Islamic State (ISIS)… and under Putin’s leadership, Russia’s military has shown itself willing to kill the Islamic terrorists.
Putin sees how weak and pathetic the American president is, which is why he just made a big announcement: Vladimir Putin endorses Donald Trump for President!
From a recent press conference…
Russian President Vladimir Putin had kind words for his “stablemate” Donald Trump during an annual end-of-the-year Q&A session in Moscow.
“[Donald Trump is] a really brilliant and talented person, without any doubt,” [Vladimir] Putin told reporters, according to a translation by Interfax. “It’s not our job to judge his qualities, that’s a job for American voters, but he’s the absolute leader in the presidential race.”
The GOP frontrunner has been blunt about his plans for defrosting U.S. relations with Russia should he be elected president.
[…]
“He says he wants to move on to a new, more substantial relationship, a deeper relationship with Russia, how can we not welcome that?” he said. “Of course we welcome that.”
Putin
Clearly, Putin is ready for a bold leader in the White House that he can team up with to kill the terrorists and keep citizens of both of our nations safe.
What do you think of Putin’s endorsement of Donald Trump? Please leave us a comment (below) and tell us what you think.
Facebook Like Button
THE POLITICAL INSIDER on Facebook
Vladimir Putin Just Made A MASSIVE Donald Trump Announcement!
By Kosar
Putin
There are plenty of reasons to disagree with Russian leader Vladimir Putin. But unlike President Barack Obama, we know EXACTLY where Putin stands on the Islamic State (ISIS)… and under Putin’s leadership, Russia’s military has shown itself willing to kill the Islamic terrorists.
Putin sees how weak and pathetic the American president is, which is why he just made a big announcement: Vladimir Putin endorses Donald Trump for President!
From a recent press conference…
Russian President Vladimir Putin had kind words for his “stablemate” Donald Trump during an annual end-of-the-year Q&A session in Moscow.
“[Donald Trump is] a really brilliant and talented person, without any doubt,” [Vladimir] Putin told reporters, according to a translation by Interfax. “It’s not our job to judge his qualities, that’s a job for American voters, but he’s the absolute leader in the presidential race.”
The GOP frontrunner has been blunt about his plans for defrosting U.S. relations with Russia should he be elected president.
[…]
“He says he wants to move on to a new, more substantial relationship, a deeper relationship with Russia, how can we not welcome that?” he said. “Of course we welcome that.”
Putin
Clearly, Putin is ready for a bold leader in the White House that he can team up with to kill the terrorists and keep citizens of both of our nations safe.
What do you think of Putin’s endorsement of Donald Trump? Please leave us a comment (below) and tell us what you think.
Facebook Like Button
THE POLITICAL INSIDER on Facebook
Similar threads
