• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Those who desire hardcore opposition

brocoli

Alfrescian
Loyal
I see 68% for PAP due to sub-par opposition candidates and fragmented opposition with so many parties...

I see WP votes drop to 42% from 46%...

If WP can hold on to Aljunied, is consider a very good results ...

MOST LIKELY RESULTS ... WP retain hougang for 1 seat in parliament...

a good result for PAP will be to bring its hougang votes to at least 45%

pls remember who saw it 1st
 

PoliticalDialogue

Alfrescian
Loyal
Those who want change being naturally more vocal "but may not be representative".
Remarks delivered on 20 July 2015 at an IQ Panel Discussion.

[video=youtube;1lk6Xu0lCXA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lk6Xu0lCXA[/video]
 

3_M

Alfrescian
Loyal
Come to think of it, pap purposely made themselves appeared weaker to deceit everyone the competition was intense and sound the alarm there was a real danger of regime change. Opposition did the opposite by campaigning from a position of strength. To make it appeared they were fighting a winning battle when in reality, many do not even come close to threaten pap. But this scared the middle ground, fearful that there was a real danger of pap falling amid the economic uncertainties ahead.

It might perhaps be more tactically sound if opposition does the opposite. To play the underdog and emphasize they are fighting an uphill battle to make pap work harder for their mandate.
 

The_Hypocrite

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Basically the middle ground voter is a retard who votes for more shafting. There was nothing to b afraid of n they believe it?

Come to think of it, pap purposely made themselves appeared weaker to deceit everyone the competition was intense and sound the alarm there was a real danger of regime change. Opposition did the opposite by campaigning from a position of strength. To make it appeared they were fighting a winning battle when in reality, many do not even come close to threaten pap. But this scared the middle ground, fearful that there was a real danger of pap falling amid the economic uncertainties ahead.

It might perhaps be more tactically sound if opposition does the opposite. To play the underdog and emphasize they are fighting an uphill battle to make pap work harder for their mandate.
 

PoliticalDialogue

Alfrescian
Loyal
Those stridently anti-PAP types have yet to reconcile themselves with the results of GE2015.

As I have said for many years, the majority of Singaporeans will only put up with a moderate opposition.

As long as CSJ and his small clique remain in-charge of the SDP it will never see any electoral success.
 
Top