US Navy TOP GUN Pilot wants defect to China give secert n Prison Break

http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/08/n...hange-for-chinese-breaking-him-out-of-prison/




Navy Pilot Tries To Sell F-35 Secrets In Exchange For Chinese Breaking Him Out Of Prison

JONAH BENNETT
Reporter, Daily Caller News Foundation
11:30 AM 07/08/2015

A Top Gun Navy pilot serving time in prison for producing child pornography tried to sell secrets about the F-35 and F/A-18 Super Hornet to the Chinese. What did he want in return? He wanted the Chinese to break him out of prison.

While serving time in prison, 31-year-old Lt. Daniel Chase Harris wrote a letter to the Chinese Embassy saying that he believed he was wrongly convicted of coercing young girls into shooting pornographic material of themselves, The Virginian-Pilot reports.

A federal jury convicted him after a 12-day trial, which ended in March. He was first arrested in late 2013 by the Bedford County Sheriff’s Office.

Based on court testimony, Harris adopted online aliases and pretended to be different teenage boys, while talking to the girls between 2011 and 2013. After obtaining naked photos of the girls, he tried to threaten them into sending videos, saying if they refused, he’d show the photos to the girls’ friends.

10 Countries With Crazy High Salaries
TopMens
This is what your private banking salary and bonus should be in Singapore
eFinancialCareers
by TaboolaSponsored Links
One girl tried to commit suicide. After speaking with investigators in November 2013, Harris wrote a letter apologizing to one of the victims.

In his most recent letter, Harris informed the Chinese that if they didn’t respond on a quick enough timeframe, he’d pass the information to the Russians, instead. Since he knew his mail was being screened at the Western Tidewater Regional Jail, he adopted the name of another inmate.

“Attached is a list (partial) of information I possess that I believe you would be very interested in having. All I ask in return is that you break me out,” the letter wrote. “Once out and under your protection, all my knowledge is yours.”

“I believe this letter, the schedule it is written on and a Google search of me in Virginia Beach will prove my sincerity/honesty,” the letter added. “The decision is yours, but if you don’t act fast it will be gone.”


Harris’ sentencing hearing is set for Monday. Federal prosecutors haven’t added any new charges as a result of the letter. Even if there were any charges, Harris’ defense attorney, Andrew Sacks, said Harris never wrote the letter. This isn’t the first time that Sacks has argued the point. Previously, Sacks said that Harris’ computer was hacked by a “John Anderson” who wanted to ruin the pilot’s marriage by threatening girls for explicit material. Prosecutors, however, are fairly convinced that letters and text messages sent from “Anderson” originated from Harris while in prison.

Harris faces anywhere from a minimum of 15 years to life in prison.

http://hamptonroads.com/2015/07/top...e-out-jail-and-ill-tell-you-everything-i-know



Prosecutors: Top Gun grad offered China secrets for help with jailbreak
Share
686
644
42
0
0

Daniel Chase Harris, 31, is in jail for producing child pornography.
SEARCH: NORFOLK CRIME
Crime type:
(burglary, arson, assault, etc.)
Near address:
Enter an address near which to search
Within radius:
If searching near an address, select a radius
From date:

To date:


Search more cities | Crime Line | DataPilot


RELATED
Naval officer guilty of making child porn, obstruction - Mar. 10
Testimony: Sisters made sex videos under threat - Feb. 25
Defendant's statement can't be used in child porn trial - Feb. 3
Navy pilot gets to keep attorney in child porn case - Jan. 17
Feds want Navy pilot's lawyer off child porn case - Jan. 16
Virginia Beach man faces additional sexting charges - Oct. 8, 2014
Navy pilot accused of extorting minors over nude pix - May. 2, 2014
Oceana-based Navy pilot faces more charges - Dec. 23, 2013
Navy pilot based in Virginia Beach denied bond again - Dec. 17, 2013
Navy pilot accused of online offenses against girl, 13 - Nov. 14, 2013


By Scott Daugherty
The Virginian-Pilot
© July 8, 2015
NORFOLK

In jail for producing child pornography, a Top Gun graduate turned flight instructor offered to share his fighter pilot expertise with the Chinese government in exchange for its help in breaking him out, according to federal prosecutors.

Correctional officers seized a signed letter to the Chinese Embassy in which Lt. Daniel Chase Harris indicated he had been wrongly convicted of 31 felonies in U.S. District Court in Norfolk and no longer believed in his country.

"Attached is a list (partial) of information I possess that I believe you would be very interested in having. All I ask in return is that you break me out," reads the letter, which referred to the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, F/A-18 Super Hornet, and general carrier operations, among other things.

The letter concluded with a threat to contact the Russian Embassy if the Chinese did not act fast.

"Once out and under your protection, all my knowledge is yours."

Harris, 31, of Virginia Beach, is set to be sentenced Monday on charges he coerced nine girls between the ages of 12 and 17 into making sexual videos of themselves. He faces the possibility of life in prison.

No new charges have been filed in connection with the letter. Harris' defense attorney, Andrew Sacks, denies his client wrote it. Sacks said he was "actively investigating rebuttal evidence to the allegations that he could have authored or sent the letter."

It isn't the first time Harris - a 2005 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy - has denied authoring a potentially damaging letter while in jail. Prosecutors bolstered their case at trial with a series of letters and related text messages that investigators say Harris wrote after his arrest. One of the letters, signed "John Anderson" and mailed to Sacks with the help of a friend, claimed that Anderson had framed Harris because he was in love with his wife and wanted to break up their marriage.

Harris' wife filed for divorce in February 2014, shortly after his arrest.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Elizabeth Yusi said in court documents the Chinese Embassy letter was sent using another inmate's name because Harris knew staffers at the Western Tidewater Regional Jail were screening his mail. She did not say how the letter came to the attention of authorities.

The letter was written on the back of Navy flight schedules similar to those that were admitted into evidence at his trial and included a crude map identifying the location of Harris' cell.

"I believe this letter, the schedule it is written on and a Google search of me in Virginia Beach will prove my sincerity/honesty," the letter said. "The decision is yours, but if you don't act fast it will be gone."

A federal jury convicted Harris in March on the 13th day of his trial. Sacks has announced plans to appeal.

According to court testimony, Harris' victims did not know him by name. Prosecutors argued he used online aliases to contact the girls between 2011 and 2013 while he was stationed in Japan; Guam; Key West, Fla.; and Virginia Beach. He was last assigned to Strike Fighter Weapons School Atlantic at Oceana Naval Air Station.

They say Harris used the aliases to pose as teenage boys and to flirt with the girls. He would eventually talk the girls into posing naked for him while chatting online.

The girls said the flirtation eventually turned to threats. Harris would tell the girls he would post the videos online or show them to the girls' friends if they refused his demands.

The youngest victim was 12 when she met Harris online. She testified she tried to cut off communication with him when she realized he was not a teenage boy, but she couldn't.

The girl tried to kill herself after the ordeal, court documents said.

"Blackmail and extortion are abhorrent crimes," Yusi wrote in court documents. "Somehow, though, Harris found a way to go even beyond abhorrent behavior and commit unspeakable, unfathomable crimes involving young, impressionable girls."

In an interview Tuesday, Sacks maintained Harris was innocent. For the purposes of sentencing, however, he took the position that his client was guilty and his misdeeds were the result of his desire to be the best. He noted that Harris is the grandson of a two-star admiral, the son of a Navy commander pilot, and the son-in-law of a Navy surface warfare commander.

"The defendant became a slave to his own aspirations, his self-expectations, and his efforts to succeed. Attaining those achievements controlled the defendant - whether it was being the best student, the best lacrosse player, the best pilot, the best husband, the best son," Sacks wrote. "At some point, being controlled by events caught up with the defendant, and he rebelled psychologically, unconsciously, unknowingly, seeking instead to wrest some kind of control for himself other than the quests for perfection that had been controlling him for years."

Sacks went on to blame the "John Anderson" letter on his client's "deep denial and repression" and a desire to "avoid the humiliation of child pornography-related conduct."

"When law enforcement activity eventually caught up with the defendant, the realization and recognition of his behavior was too shameful to allow him to admit to his flaws," Sacks wrote.

Federal guidelines recommend Harris receive a life sentence. Prosecutors are seeking at least 50 years. Sacks is asking for 15 years - the mandatory minimum.

Scott Daugherty, 757-446-2343, [email protected]

http://www.nola.com/military/index.ssf/2015/07/navy_pilot_asks_china_break_me.html


Navy pilot tells China: Break me out of U.S. jail and I'll talk, newspaper reports


Gavel in court room (image via Thinkstock.com/user moodboard)
Print Email
By Paul Purpura, NOLA.com | The Times-Picayune
Email the author | Follow on Twitter
on July 07, 2015 at 3:50 PM, updated July 07, 2015 at 4:00 PM
Comments
A Navy fighter pilot and Top Gun graduate convicted of sex-related crimes with girls told China's government that if it breaks him out of a Virginia*prison, he will tell it everything he knows, The Virginian-Pilot reports*citing federal prosecutors.

Lt. Daniel Chase Harris, 31, wrote the letter to the Chinese embassy, asserting he was wrongly convicted of 31 crimes in a federal court in Norfolk, Va., earlier this year, prosecutors said in court documents. As such, Harris said he no longer believes his country, the newspaper reports.

Harris's attorney denied his client wrote it. Harris could face life in prison when he's sentenced this month.

A third-generation Navy officer, Harris*was convicted of contacting girls between between the ages of 12 and 17 and getting them to make explicit videos of themselves*while he was stationed in Japan, Guam, Florida and Virginia, according to the report. *

Read The Virginian-Pilot report.

Top Gun pilot can also write to ISIS Taliban. They captured alot of aircrafts needs Top Gun pilots Leh, got at least 20 vacancies.

China a bit to held ransom to dignity, and won't do such thing to break US prison. This prison break is not technically difficult to do. But to do so need to kill US guards, and US be vengeance. The values of the pilot's intelligence is not so worthy. If China did any such thing they would be doing for political values, and spend money to hire American mafia or gangs to conduct the raid, and say prison raid had nothing to do with the Chinese, they only accepted a defection after the pilot himself hired people to help his freedom.

To tell the truth most prison in the world are poorly equipped maned and organized to protect against armed raid from outside. Sucess rate od raiding prisons to break out or assassinate prisoners are higher than most people think.


Well organized and equipped raid team can do it fast, especially when good homework was done to know the inside of prison. Basically shoot and blast in. Take hostage and threaten, and ambush any security forces coming to assist. Take hostages n flee after raid. Execute hostages one by one if they don't give up pursuit.

Najib soon will defect to Singapore begging Loong for asylum.

Pentagon lose face to charge him treason.

Whole China n Russia would get a good laugh. World laughinstock indeed.

Dumb & dumber. A top gun child pornographer asking for prison break help from China? It's like appealing to Yong Pung How to reduce your sentence. Child pornography carries the death penalty in China, for Christ's sake. He should stay in prison and count his lucky stars he's still alive.

Chinese authorities generally have much lower tolerance for crime than the Americans, hence the draconian sentences.

yellowarse said:

Dumb & dumber. A top gun child pornographer asking for prison break help from China? It's like appealing to Yong Pung How to reduce your sentence. Child pornography carries the death penalty in China, for Christ's sake. He should stay in prison and count his lucky stars he's still alive.

Chinese authorities generally have much lower tolerance for crime than the Americans, hence the draconian sentences.

Click to expand...

Well he did not committed any crime in China so Chinese have no interest to punish him. For a defector, it is not necessary much China accept as a citizen or resident. A defector can be confined to military facility for some time, then later handed over to another 3rd country of his own choice.

Snowden Wikileak defected to Russia, was received into Russia for months, given protection in a secured facility where CIA can not get him. Later help and arrange him to travel elsewhere. Snowden is seeking to go to France, after he exposed that CIA spied on French Presidents. France is reluctant to accept him fearing to get ass-kicked by Obama.

obama.bin.laden said:

Well he did not committed any crime in China so Chinese have no interest to punish him. For a defector, it is not necessary much China accept as a citizen or resident. A defector can be confined to military facility for some time, then later handed over to another 3rd country of his own choice.

Snowden Wikileak defected to Russia, was received into Russia for months, given protection in a secured facility where CIA can not get him. Later help and arrange him to travel elsewhere. Snowden is seeking to go to France, after he exposed that CIA spied on French Presidents. France is reluctant to accept him fearing to get ass-kicked by Obama.

Click to expand...

Snowden did not commit a crime. He was practising freedom of speech, which the West hypocritically champions but clamps down when it affects them. He deserves to be sheltered and given protection.

Chase is a child pornographer, which is an international crime, no matter where it's committed. All major countries are committed via Interpol to track down all child pornographers and paedophiles and bring them to justice. He deserves to be hanged.

yellowarse said:

Snowden did not commit a crime. He was practising freedom of speec.......
.

Click to expand...

Top crime against the state which is treason. Capital Punishment in US Federal Law:


https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381


Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.




18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND ...
www.law.cornell.edu › uscode
Mobile-friendly - Recruiting for service against United States · § 2390. ... Wex: Criminal Law: Overview · Title 18 USC*...
‎18 US Code § 2381 - Treason -*‎Seditious conspiracy -*‎18 US Code § 2385
18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason | US Law | LII / Legal ...
www.law.cornell.edu › ... › Chapter 115
Mobile-friendly - Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies,*...
Treason - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › title=Treason
Mobile-friendly - Federal[edit]. To avoid the abuses of the English law (including executions by*...

Tony Tan said:

Top crime against the state which is treason. Capital Punishment.

Click to expand...

Not when info reveals evidence of heinous misdemeanours, torture of POWs, invasion of a nation on fabricated pretexts and spying of allies by a major country.

It's like saying the informant who revealed Osama's or Sadaam's whereabouts should be hanged because he committed treason against the state. Duh.

He made USA top secrets in huge volume available to all the conflicting waring enemies of USA. Compromised crucial state interest to unprecedented level. If USA does not execute him when they got him, no one else in US needs to be mindful of any State Security Interest anymore. Any man call sell State Secrets to any enemy, no fear.

He worked in NSA contractor, he back-stabbed NSA in the global intelligence war game. They need to set example, give him capital penalty. He fled to Putin. Defection confirmed.

yellowarse said:

Not when info reveals evidence of heinous misdemeanours, torture of POWs, invasion of a nation on fabricated pretexts and spying of allies by a major country.

It's like saying the informant who revealed Osama's or Sadaam's whereabouts should be hanged because he committed treason against the state. Duh.

Click to expand...

Tony Tan said:

He worked in NSA contractor, he back-stabbed NSA in the global intelligence war game. They need to set example, give him capital penalty. He fled to Putin. Defection confirmed.

Click to expand...

Agree. But that does not make him an international criminal. British spy Gareth Williams was assassinated by the KGB because he was about to reveal KGB's mole in MI6, which would threaten Russian security interests. But Gareth was not a criminal, he was a snitch.

Likewise, Snowden is a snitch, not a criminal.

blissquek said:

Read about this Taiwanese captain , Justin Lin who swam the other way...from Taiwan to Communist China and got his Phd and later become World Bank chief economist.

Click to expand...

Amazing bugger.

---

The Man with the Patience to Cook a Stone

FINANCE & DEVELOPMENT, September 2012, Vol. 49, No. 3

​

F&D profiles Justin Yifu Lin, the
first World Bank Chief Economist
from a developing or emerging
economy

At a reception earlier this year to mark the end of Justin Yifu Lin’s tenure as chief economist of the World Bank, as is customary on such occasions, there was mention of a lifetime of achievements: Justin Lin, the first Chinese of his generation to receive a Ph.D. from the University of Chicago; Justin Lin, the second private citizen to own a car in Beijing; Justin Lin, the first person from a developing country or emerging market to serve as World Bank chief economist.

Alongside these milestones were tributes to his most defining qualities: his determination, his flexibility, his pragmatism. Most memorably, one of his colleagues said, drawing on an African proverb, Lin had patience that could cook a stone.

If ever a person qualified for the description of “right man, right place, right time,” Lin is that man. His qualifications include his arrival in mainland China just as—fortuitously for him—the Communist Party was launching a series of historic market reforms. Then, a serendipitous pairing of Lin’s English language skills with a visiting Nobel Prize–winning economist in need of a translator ended with Lin’s nomination for a scholarship to pursue a Ph.D. at the University of Chicago. And in June 2008, just before the world headed into the worst recession in over half a century, amid increasing clamor for emerging and developing countries to have a greater say in the running of the World Bank, Lin was selected its chief economist—the first person from a developing country to hold the post. The tide of history has been generous to the 60-year-old Lin.

Rethinking development

Fast-forward four years, and Lin is preparing to return to China after his sojourn in Washington, D.C., home of the World Bank, of which he was also a senior vice president. This intensely private, bespectacled economist contemplates the latest stage of his eventful career with a sense of quiet satisfaction. The Bank gave Lin a global platform to push his framework for rethinking development—or, as he terms it, New Structural Economics (see box).

“I opened the door for people to think, for my colleagues to think, to debate,” he says.

Lin, an expert on China’s economy, views himself as semi-detached from the Western-based policymaking circles that have historically dominated development economics. As World Bank chief economist, Lin followed in the footsteps of luminaries such as former U.S. Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers and Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz. But his theories are a deliberate and sharp critique of the Washington Consensus, the broad range of “neoliberal” policies previously closely associated with Washington D.C. institutions, including the IMF, the U.S. Treasury, and the World Bank. When asked to confirm whether he was indeed the first World Bank chief economist from a developing country, Lin responds, “Not only the first from a developing country, but also [the first] to have a good understanding of developing countries.”

According to Célestin Monga, Lin’s coauthor and World Bank colleague, Lin is “the one guy in the history of all the chief economists at the World Bank who has actually been part of the lifting out of poverty of 600 million people. Do you need anything else?”

Stiglitz says Lin played a major role in marrying the lessons of growth in east Asia, the fastest-growing region of the world, with development economics.

Model army officer

Lin’s modest background—he was born one of six children into a poor family in Yilan County, northeastern Taiwan Province of China, in 1952—may distinguish him from his predecessors, but undoubtedly he is the only World Bank chief economist with an arrest warrant hanging over his head.

In 1979, the 26-year-old, who then went by the name Lin Zhengyi, a model officer in the Taiwanese army stationed on the politically sensitive island of Kinmen, decided to swim across the 2,000-meter tidal strait to the Communist-controlled mainland to start a new life.

Following his disappearance, the Taiwanese authorities who declared him “missing” compensated his wife with the equivalent of more than $30,000; much later, they charged him with desertion.

Ask Lin about his decision today and the economist bats away further inquiries—the only time during the whole interview his ever-present smile freezes and he betrays a hint of irritation. Lin left behind his three-year-old son and wife, Chen Yunying, who was then pregnant with their daughter. Asked about his wife’s reaction to his defection, Lin says,

“She supported me. As long as I am happy, she is happy.”

“So did you tell your wife you were going to leave?”

“I implied that.”

Transforming China

When he arrived on the mainland, Lin changed his name to Lin Yifu, meaning “a persistent man.” Unable to contact his family directly, Lin sent a letter to a cousin in Tokyo describing his loneliness and longing for his wife and children. Alongside prosaic domestic details—including a request that his cousin send Christmas presents on his behalf to his family using Lin’s secret nickname—are descriptions of a China at a critical juncture in its development as it sought to transform itself from a centrally planned to a market economy:

“Now, China is examining the 30 years since the founding of the People’s Republic in a serious and honest manner—and trying to learn from its mistakes—in order to build a modernized China. Ever since the Gang of Four was overthrown, the entire mainland has been advancing by leaps and bounds; people are full of aspiration and confidence. I strongly believe that China’s future is bright; one can be proud to be Chinese, standing in the world with one’s head held high and chest out,” he wrote.

China and other countries—most notably in Asia—that have made the leap from underdevelopment and widespread poverty are core exemplars of Lin’s thesis of development. In his New Structural Economics, Lin argues a prescription for underdeveloped countries that could crudely be summarized as “make the best of what you’ve got.”

A key tenet of his “new framework for development” is the critical role of government in supporting selected industries in order to trigger structural transformation. This practice, often colloquially referred to as “picking winners and losers,” or industrial policy, has had a checkered history, but in the aftermath of the financial crisis has been enjoying something of a revival.

The leading criticism remains that the government’s imperfect judgment and distorted interests displace the cold, clear decisions of the market. For example, Japan’s much-lauded Ministry of Trade and Industry once opposed the plans of domestic car manufacturers to export and tried to prevent Honda expanding from motorbikes into cars because it did not want another company in the industry.

To avoid such mistakes, the secret of success, suggests Lin, is identifying industries appropriate for a given country’s endowment structure and level of development. He points to Chile, for example, which moved from basic industries such as mining, forestry, fishing, and agriculture, to aluminum smelting, salmon farming, and winemaking, with the backing of the government. Lin says, in the past, industrial policy often failed because government tried to impose the development of industries that were ill-suited to the country’s endowment. That is, they “defied” their comparative advantage.

Lin’s choice of New Structural Economics as the appellation for his theoretical framework has resonances of Structuralist economics—referred to by Lin as the first wave of development thinking—which emerged in Latin America in the 1940s, with its support for government intervention to promote development. But the World Bank’s regional chief economist for Africa, Shantayanan Devarajan, believes the intellectual origins of Lin’s New Structural Economics lie closer to home, and in the more recent past.

Earlier this year, at a seminar to mark the launch of Lin’s new book outlining his thesis, Devarajan opened the proceedings with the provocative salvo: “When I saw the title New Structural Economics, I was reminded of what Voltaire said about the Holy Roman Empire. ‘That it was neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an empire.’ So I am going to challenge Justin to convince us that this is new, that this is structural, that it is economic.”

Devarajan is skeptical about the originality of Lin’s thesis, which, he says, is “the quintessential application of neoclassical economics to development. Because neoclassical economics says markets should operate unless there is a market failure, like an externality. If there is an externality, then government should intervene to fix that externality.”

Lin acknowledges a debt to neoclassical economics while maintaining that the critical and large role given to government makes his theory distinctive. If the Washington Consensus is the second wave of development thinking, he regards his approach as the third, or “Development Thinking 3.0.” His work “challenged economic convention,” said Uri Dadush, a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

A new book by Lin, The Quest for Prosperity, explains new structural economics and reflects lessons learned from four years at the World Bank. By following this framework, Lin shows how even the poorest nations can grow rapidly for several decades, significantly reduce poverty, and become middle- or even high-income countries in the span of one or two generations. “Lin dares to envision the end of world poverty,” says Nobel laureate George Akerlof.

The problem of comparative advantage

Some of Lin’s precepts appear deceptively intuitive. It might seem obvious that countries should play to their strengths. But would Lin, given his directive that countries focus on their underlying comparative advantage, have recommended that Korea create a ship-building industry in the 1970s considering the country’s limited domestic supply of raw materials such as iron, coal, and steel, and the lack of any knowledge of the sector? Some other economists doubt it. And yet that was Korea’s successful recipe for development.

“Given the nature of the process of factor accumulation and technological capability-building, it is simply not possible for a backward economy to accumulate capabilities in new industries without defying comparative advantage and actually entering the industry before it has the ‘right’ factor endowments,” says Cambridge University professor Ha-Joon Chang.

The strong imprint of neoclassical economics in Lin’s framework is perhaps unsurprising: he trained at the University of Chicago. His admission to the citadel of free-market thinking was another example of the happy good fortune that has periodically blessed his existence. Within a year of his arrival in China, by dint of his English language skills learned in Taiwan, Lin was recruited as a translator for visiting economist Theodore Schultz. Schultz had, that year, been awarded the Nobel Prize for economics for his pioneering research into the problems faced by developing countries.

So impressed was Schultz with his young interpreter—who was by then studying Marxist economics at Peking University—that on his return to his teaching post at the University of Chicago, Schultz offered to arrange a scholarship for the young Lin.

How long did Lin spend with the top economist to have elicited such a generous offer? Just one day, “but I was a very impressive translator,” says Lin. His smile does not waver. Schultz had a reputation for intuitively identifying young talents, having mentored Nobel laureate George Stigler and a former president of the American Economic Association, D. Gale Johnson, for example.
Once enrolled at Chicago, the young Lin embarked on a Ph.D. in economics. He was later joined by his wife, Chen Yunying, and two children. While Lin studied for his Ph.D., and then went on to Yale as a postdoctoral student, his wife earned a Ph.D. at George Washington University.

Prolific career

When Lin and his family returned to Beijing in 1987, China was in the throes of an economic revolution, transforming itself from a centrally planned to a “socialist market economy.” Against the backdrop of state-owned enterprises being carved into smaller private businesses, the decollectivization of agriculture, and the creation of special economic zones, Lin embarked on a prolific career. Even before he joined the World Bank, he had authored 18 books and numerous papers.

In 1994 Lin helped found the China Center for Economic Research (CCER) at Peking University, set up to attract foreign-educated Chinese brains at a time when the country was thirsting for knowledge about how to harness its economic potential. The center became increasingly influential in the shaping of Chinese economic policy.

Lead economist

Lin’s chief economist and senior vice president position at the World Bank—he was selected by the organization’s President Robert Zoellick—meant he was chief economic advisor to the World Bank president, spokesperson for the Bank’s development policies, and head of the Bank’s research, prospects (global monitoring and projections), and data departments. In that role, he led almost 300 economists, statisticians and researchers tasked with reducing poverty and promoting global development.

He earned a reputation as a hard worker and canny operator. “He always has his game face on,” said one colleague, Monga, who accompanied Lin on many business trips. He described how Lin, rather than socializing after a day’s work would labor long into the night. “Justin was all about work,” he said.

Inevitably, the experience of serving as chief economist was not without its challenges. Lin encountered internal dissent about his views, often with strong opposing opinions coming from within the research department that he supervised. Lin says he listened to disagreement, but some staff at the Bank say he largely sidestepped them. “He didn’t try to shape it or mold it any which way; he just separated himself. And I think that was less productive than it could have been,” said one high-level economist at the Bank.

To ensure that his work on development economics made a mark on the Bank, Lin set up a research team to work on industrialization in Africa, which he sees as ripe for growth. As emerging markets such as China, India, and Brazil move up the industrial ladder and “graduate” from low-skilled manufacturing sectors, he argues, it will open up opportunities for low-income countries in Africa and elsewhere to get into those sectors. “This will free up a gigantic reservoir of employment possibilities that African and other low-income countries can tap into,” Lin said. But African countries need to plan for this handover.

Hassan Taha, an executive director at the Bank who represents 21 African countries, says Lin “encouraged an evolution in thinking” that helped developing countries better tackle the challenge of poverty reduction.

Return to Beijing

Lin has now returned to Beijing to resume teaching at the CCER. While grateful for the opportunities that his position as chief economist offered him, Lin said he was eager to return to China after getting a bird’s-eye view of global development from Washington. His personal and professional love of China would preclude any long-term separation.

Perhaps only one place continues to be an elusive attraction. At a seminar organized by the Center for Global Development in Washington just weeks before the end of his stay in the U.S. capital, Lin revealed he still harbored a “dream” to return to Taiwan Province of China to pay tribute to his ancestors and meet relatives and friends.

In 2002, following the death of his father, Lin applied to return for the funeral. The authorities approved his application, but the army issued an order for his arrest for desertion—an order that has yet to be lifted. Consequently, Lin was represented by his wife at his father’s funeral—a serious shortcoming for an Asian son.

Lin maintains that the island will eventually be reunited with the mainland.

So far, appeals by his supporters to have his arrest warrant lifted have fallen on deaf ears. Earlier this year, in answer to a parliamentary question, Taiwan’s Defense Minister, Kao Hua-chu, who was Lin’s battalion commander and a close friend, told the legislature’s Foreign and National Defense Committee that he would resign in protest if Lin did not face the charge upon returning. In response, Lin said he can wait.

Lin’s legendary patience is set to be tested for a while longer. ■

He's lost that lovin' feeling