-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
#OccupyCentral thread: Give me Liberty or Give me Death!
- Thread starter Asterix
- Start date
Re: Selfish Singaporeans always think about money!
See that 3rd world sinkies...
The HK people FIGHT for their rights... do you understand what is that??? or are you still trying to find your freaking pathetic balls???
See that 3rd world sinkies...
The HK people FIGHT for their rights... do you understand what is that??? or are you still trying to find your freaking pathetic balls???
Re: Selfish Singaporeans always think about money!
Fight for what? In Singapore, life is good. Gahmen provide everything, jobs, law and order, healthcare, security, public transport. Only thing they don't provide is char kwey teow, but downstairs at kopitiam got, good one also. A bit expensive, but can afford still. Why fight?
Cheers!
Fight for what? In Singapore, life is good. Gahmen provide everything, jobs, law and order, healthcare, security, public transport. Only thing they don't provide is char kwey teow, but downstairs at kopitiam got, good one also. A bit expensive, but can afford still. Why fight?
Cheers!
Re: Selfish Singaporeans always think about money!
3rd world fucktards like you do not understand ... because 3rd world fucks don't have a mind to see far.. just bend down and get screw and all is well...
life in HK also good and has jobs, law and order, healthcare, security, public transport (better than sinkies) .......why they fight? for fun??
3rd world fucktards like you do not understand ... because 3rd world fucks don't have a mind to see far.. just bend down and get screw and all is well...
life in HK also good and has jobs, law and order, healthcare, security, public transport (better than sinkies) .......why they fight? for fun??
Re: Selfish Singaporeans always think about money!
One BIG difference between Peesai and HK - Singaporeans get to choose their leaders.
And that's what the Hong Kongers are fighting for.
Cheers!
One BIG difference between Peesai and HK - Singaporeans get to choose their leaders.
And that's what the Hong Kongers are fighting for.
Cheers!
Re: Selfish Singaporeans always think about money!
let me share with you ONE BIG difference.. During election, HK govt do not redraw boundaries to take maximum chances of winning.
You can't choose a govt who cheat to win. And if sinkies don't fight for the fairness and their right for fairness.. It is no difference at all. You can't choose at all.
Only fucktards like you will have good food , health care and transport and you are ready to give up your arse for the govt to screw.. I am so right to avoid sinkies like you..my descendants will thank me for that.
let me share with you ONE BIG difference.. During election, HK govt do not redraw boundaries to take maximum chances of winning.
You can't choose a govt who cheat to win. And if sinkies don't fight for the fairness and their right for fairness.. It is no difference at all. You can't choose at all.
Only fucktards like you will have good food , health care and transport and you are ready to give up your arse for the govt to screw.. I am so right to avoid sinkies like you..my descendants will thank me for that.
Re: HK people fight for their rights, so what sinkies fight for???
so bending down and getting screw works for you!!!!!
i am so right to stay away from sinkies shit losers.
so bending down and getting screw works for you!!!!!
i am so right to stay away from sinkies shit losers.
Re: HK people fight for their rights, so what sinkies fight for???
Sinkies will forever be in debt paying for coe every ten years and a house every 100. So must work to death.
Sinkies will forever be in debt paying for coe every ten years and a house every 100. So must work to death.
Re: HK people fight for their rights, so what sinkies fight for???
Sinkies are forever grateful to Ah Loong for giving them goals in life to keep working for
Sinkies are forever grateful to Ah Loong for giving them goals in life to keep working for
Official proof that US financed and brainwashed HK youth to provoke China
http://www.moonofalabama.org/2014/09/the-ned-hong-kong-riots.html
The (NED Financed) Hong Kong Riots
Some organized "student groups" in Hong Kong tried to occupy government buildings and blocked some streets. The police did what it does everywhere when such things happen. It used anti-riot squads, pepper spray and tear gas to prevent occupations and to clear the streets.
The "western" media are making some issue about this as if "western" governments would behave any differently.
The alleged issue in question is the election of new Hong Kong chief executive in 2017. According to Hong Kong's basic law, which was implemented when Britain gave up its dictatorship over the colony, there will be universal suffrage - everyone will be allowed to vote - but the candidates for the position will have to go through some pre-screening by a commission. This is what China had promised and this is what the students, falsely claiming that China is backtracking from its promises, want to change.
Peter Lee aka Chinahand has an excellent piece on the issue at Asia Times Online. But Lee is making one mistake in that he does not consider outside influence:
Occupy Hong Kong decided to light it, starting with a class boycott and demonstrations organized by the Hong Kong Federation of Students. And, since I’m never afraid to mix a metaphor, the Hong Kong government poured fuel on the fire by pepper-spraying and teargassing it.
Who really "decided to light this"? To me the protests, and the "western" reporting about it, have the distinct smell not of tear gas but of some expensive Color Revolution perfume of "western" origin.
So lets look up the usual source of such exquisite fragrance. The 2012 annual report of the U.S. government financed National Endowment of Democracy, aka the CCA - Central Color-Revolution Agency, includes three grants for Hong Kong one of which is new for 2012 and not mentioned in earlier annual reports:
National Democratic Institute for International Affairs - $460,000
To foster awareness regarding Hong Kong's political institutions and constitutional reform process and to develop the capacity of citizens - particularly university students - to more effectively participate in the public debate on political reform, NDI will work with civil society organizations on parliamentary monitoring, a survey, and development of an Internet portal, allowing students and citizens to explore possible reforms leading to universal suffrage.
So the U.S. government in 2012 (2013 numbers are not yet available) hands over nearly half a million to "develop the capacity" of "university students" related to the issue of "universal suffrage" in the election of Hong Kong's chief executive.
Two years after the money starts to flow from the U.S. government university students in Hong Kong provoke street riots with demands exactly on the issue the U.S. government money wanted to highlight.
That is just some curious coincidence - right?
http://www.moonofalabama.org/2014/09/the-ned-hong-kong-riots.html
The (NED Financed) Hong Kong Riots
Some organized "student groups" in Hong Kong tried to occupy government buildings and blocked some streets. The police did what it does everywhere when such things happen. It used anti-riot squads, pepper spray and tear gas to prevent occupations and to clear the streets.
The "western" media are making some issue about this as if "western" governments would behave any differently.
The alleged issue in question is the election of new Hong Kong chief executive in 2017. According to Hong Kong's basic law, which was implemented when Britain gave up its dictatorship over the colony, there will be universal suffrage - everyone will be allowed to vote - but the candidates for the position will have to go through some pre-screening by a commission. This is what China had promised and this is what the students, falsely claiming that China is backtracking from its promises, want to change.
Peter Lee aka Chinahand has an excellent piece on the issue at Asia Times Online. But Lee is making one mistake in that he does not consider outside influence:
Occupy Hong Kong decided to light it, starting with a class boycott and demonstrations organized by the Hong Kong Federation of Students. And, since I’m never afraid to mix a metaphor, the Hong Kong government poured fuel on the fire by pepper-spraying and teargassing it.
Who really "decided to light this"? To me the protests, and the "western" reporting about it, have the distinct smell not of tear gas but of some expensive Color Revolution perfume of "western" origin.
So lets look up the usual source of such exquisite fragrance. The 2012 annual report of the U.S. government financed National Endowment of Democracy, aka the CCA - Central Color-Revolution Agency, includes three grants for Hong Kong one of which is new for 2012 and not mentioned in earlier annual reports:
National Democratic Institute for International Affairs - $460,000
To foster awareness regarding Hong Kong's political institutions and constitutional reform process and to develop the capacity of citizens - particularly university students - to more effectively participate in the public debate on political reform, NDI will work with civil society organizations on parliamentary monitoring, a survey, and development of an Internet portal, allowing students and citizens to explore possible reforms leading to universal suffrage.
So the U.S. government in 2012 (2013 numbers are not yet available) hands over nearly half a million to "develop the capacity" of "university students" related to the issue of "universal suffrage" in the election of Hong Kong's chief executive.
Two years after the money starts to flow from the U.S. government university students in Hong Kong provoke street riots with demands exactly on the issue the U.S. government money wanted to highlight.
That is just some curious coincidence - right?
Similar threads
