Foreign Embassies Make A Mockery of SG's Traffic Rules. Thanks to FAP Traitors!

[h=1]WHY ARE THERE SO MANY CASES OF FOREIGN EMBASSY CARS BREAKING OUR TRAFFIC RULES?[/h]


<!-- /.block -->
<style>.node-article .field-name-link-line-above-tags{float: right;}.node-article .field-name-ad-box-in-article {float: left;margin: 15px 15px 10px 0;}.node-article .field-tags{clear: both;}</style>
Post date:
15 Sep 2014 - 11:06pm









<ins id="aswift_0_expand" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: inline-table; visibility: visible; position: relative; background-color: transparent; border-image: none;"><ins id="aswift_0_anchor" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: block; visibility: visible; position: relative; background-color: transparent; border-image: none;"><iframe name="aswift_0" width="336" height="280" id="aswift_0" frameBorder="0" marginWidth="0" marginHeight="0" scrolling="no" vspace="0" hspace="0" allowfullscreen="true" style="left: 0px; top: 0px; position: absolute;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></ins></ins>


Dear TRS,
Of late, there have been many incidences of lawless and reckless foreign embassy car's drivers violating Singapore's traffic laws and road rules.
In fact, I was surprised when one of my friend forwarded these pics to me where he had compiled many of the incidents that happened recently of embassy cars flouting our traffic rules.
I was shocked to see that there are many embassies' cars totally ignoring our traffic law and order. What makes them so bold enough to openly violate our laws? Aren't they afraid of being summoned by our TP or Ministry of Foreign Affairs?

Are these embassies' cars openly challenging the rule of law in Singapore? Or they simply feel they have every privileges and rights to break our laws as and when they want to?







<ins id="aswift_1_expand" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: inline-table; visibility: visible; position: relative; background-color: transparent; border-image: none;"><ins id="aswift_1_anchor" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: block; visibility: visible; position: relative; background-color: transparent; border-image: none;"><iframe name="aswift_1" width="336" height="280" id="aswift_1" frameBorder="0" marginWidth="0" marginHeight="0" scrolling="no" vspace="0" hspace="0" allowfullscreen="true" style="left: 0px; top: 0px; position: absolute;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></ins></ins>


Wonder also whether our Singapore government will have the courage to take on these embassies, or they will adopt a low key cowardice approach in closing one eye to these law-breakers with "special privileges"?
If they can get away with such breaking our traffic law and order, what else will they think of breaking next?
Annoyed Singaporean
TRS Contributor

Dumbfuck Sinkies obviously don't understand the concept of "diplomatic immunity".

It applies in all countries not just Singapore.

Angmo tua kee.....
Old colonial masters mindset is still alive in sinkieland.
Sinkies need someone to lord over them else they will feel they have no sense of purpose in life.

Leongsam said:

Dumbfuck Sinkies obviously don't understand the concept of "diplomatic immunity".

It applies in all countries not just Singapore.

Click to expand...

Yes, but this immunity covers only for jail term.
The law breaker could still be fine, and the worse case he/ she must leave the country if found guilty.

Leongsam said:

Dumbfuck Sinkies obviously don't understand the concept of "diplomatic immunity".

It applies in all countries not just Singapore.

Click to expand...

Alamak, you are behind the news lah. Remember the Americans forced the Indian diplomat to run back to India? She will never be able to step foot on US soil forever.

Because they can.

Cheers!

makapaaa said:

[h=1]WHY ARE THERE SO MANY CASES OF FOREIGN EMBASSY CARS BREAKING OUR TRAFFIC RULES?[/h]

Click to expand...

greenies said:

Yes, but this immunity covers only for jail term.
The law breaker could still be fine, and the worse case he/ she must leave the country if found guilty.

Click to expand...

There are many private citizens who are not law abiding locals. These new citizens or non-citizens may take the law into their own hands & huntum them.

It would be interesting to see if the courts practice maximum restraint.

winnipegjets said:

Alamak, you are behind the news lah. Remember the Americans forced the Indian diplomat to run back to India? She will never be able to step foot on US soil forever.

Click to expand...

You are misinformed. The person you refer to, Devyani Khobragade, was a consular official and enjoyed only "consular immunity".

to deal with these asshole, you got to beat them up.

since the law can't do anything to them, then let people do something to them.

If sinkies are ball-less, then you have yourself to blame.

it is all about having balls...

now you know why i stay away from sinkies.

greenies said:

Yes, but this immunity covers only for jail term.
The law breaker could still be fine, and the worse case he/ she must leave the country if found guilty.

Click to expand...

Where did you get the information that diplomatic immunity covers only offenses which involve a jail term? Please quote your source.

To learn more about diplomatic immunity, read http://www.stuffyoushouldknow.com/blog/diplomatic-immunity

This immunity thing is a joke. We have a fucking useless gabernment. :oIo:

LEGEND said:

This immunity thing is a joke. We have a fucking useless gabernment. :oIo:

Click to expand...

It may be a joke to a moron like yourself but it does serve a useful purpose. It prevent situations where the messenger is victimised because the recipient did not like the message he delivered.

It was historically a case of the phrase "Don't shoot the messenger" being put into practice in the real world of international diplomacy.

tonychat said:

to deal with these asshole, you got to beat them up.

since the law can't do anything to them, then let people do something to them.

If sinkies are ball-less, then you have yourself to blame.

it is all about having balls...

now you know why i stay away from sinkies.

Click to expand...

Yes that's why we have to catch them and behead them.

Allahu Akbar!

CD car are cheap, no import tax and no coe. if know anyone working in embassies, can also have access to duty free ciggies.

All foreign embassies should be hosted in Batam.<style>.node-article .field-name-link-line-above-tags{float: right;}.node-article .field-name-ad-box-in-article {float: left;margin: 15px 15px 10px 0;}.node-article .field-tags{clear: both;}</style>

Leongsam said:

It may be a joke to a moron like yourself but it does serve a useful purpose. It prevent situations where the messenger is victimised because the recipient did not like the message he delivered.

It was historically a case of the phrase "Don't shoot the messenger" being put into practice in the real world of international diplomacy.

Click to expand...

You are stupid or what? Comparing peace time code and war time code. And by the way, what kind of message is the diplomat putting across by flouting the parking rules? How about getting a messenger to Syria and fuck Allah in front of the IS Leader? You think they wont shoot the messenger? :oIo:

LEGEND said:

You are stupid or what? Comparing peace time code and war time code. And by the way, what kind of message is the diplomat putting across by flouting the parking rules? How about getting a messenger to Syria and fuck Allah in front of the IS Leader? You think they wont shoot the messenger? :oIo:

Click to expand...

Syria is an uncivilized rogue nation which shows absolute disregard for the norms and rules of the civilized world. If you want Singapore to end up in the same state, you're even more moronic than I first thought.

Leongsam said:

Syria is an uncivilized rogue nation which shows absolute disregard for the norms and rules of the civilized world. If you want Singapore to end up in the same state, you're even more moronic than I first thought.

Click to expand...

They can do whatever they want within their Embassy. Out of it, they have to follow the laws of the country they are residing. Look at the late Qing era, foreigners can do whatever they want under immunity protection. You want Sinkieland to end up in the same state, dumbass?

LEGEND said:

They can do whatever they want within their Embassy. Out of it, they have to follow the laws of the country they are residing. Look at the late Qing era, foreigners can do whatever they want under immunity protection. You want Sinkieland to end up in the same state, dumbass?

Click to expand...

Immunity under the current UN conventions is clearly spelt out. It covers only certain members of the diplomatic corps and not ALL foreigners.

This agreement is a long standing one that has existed in one form or another for centuries. If you are not happy with the status quo, you are welcome to start a campaign to rid the world of this convention in its current form.

However, to single out Singapore as being softer on diplomats compared to other countries simply isn't true. This issue is has been highlighted the world over and nowhere is it more blatant than in NYC where the UN itself is housed.

Leongsam said:

Immunity under the current UN conventions is clearly spelt out. It covers only certain members of the diplomatic corps and not ALL foreigners.

This agreement is a long standing one that has existed in one form or another for centuries. If you are not happy with the status quo, you are welcome to start a campaign to rid the world of this convention in its current form.

However, to single out Singapore as being softer on diplomats compared to other countries simply isn't true. This issue is has been highlighted the world over and nowhere is it more blatant than in NYC where the UN itself is housed.

Click to expand...

It is not for me to start any campaign. We have a gabernment who represent us and the country, don't we? Useless gabernment.