MDA staff jailed 14 months for corruption and ordered to pay penalty of $18,000
Lai Wai Khuen, former assistant director of Media Development Authority (MDA)'s Industry Operations Division, was jailed for 14 months on Tuesday and ordered to pay a penalty of $18,000.
The Straits Times
Tuesday, Jul 08, 2014
SINGAPORE - A Media Development Authority (MDA) assistant director who corruptly obtained loans from grant applicants in return for facilitating MDA grants was jailed for 14 months on Tuesday.
Get the full story from The Straits Times.
Lai Wai Khuen admitted to the anti-graft agency that he had accumulated substantial debts from frequent gambling on cruise ships and in casinos, and had solicited loans to pay them off.
The 37-year-old pleaded guilty to six charges - one each of trying to get a loan and forgery, and four of getting loans of between $1,500 and $5,000.
He was originally charged with 27 counts of corruptly getting loans and one count of trying to get a loan as an inducement for facilitating the approval and disbursement of grants. He also faced three forgery charges.
Employed by MDA as a manager in 2009, Lai was promoted in July 2011 and appointed assistant director a year later, said Deputy Public Prosecutor Jiang Ke-Yue.
As assistant director, he headed a team of eight who managed talent development, the Mediapolis, publishing and media services, among others.
Part of his duties was to administer MDA grants, which meant evaluating applications and recommending awards under various schemes for assistance in development, production and marketing.
Once a grant was approved, he would prepare a letter of offer and letter of acceptance for his boss, Mr Thomas Lim Cher Leong, the director, to sign.
The Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau was tipped off on Dec 28, 2012 that Lai had engaged in corrupt practices during his employment. One of the people he tried to borrow money from had turned down his request for a $3,000 loan in October that year and complained to MDA in December.
In one of the cases, the court heard that Lai had failed to evaluate the application of Ms Catherine Khoo Poh Lin for a grant but lied to her that the $50,000 grant to her company, Experience & Experiments, had been approved.
It turned out that he had forged Mr Lim's signature on the letter of offer and passed the forged copy to Ms Khoo in 2012. While waiting for the first payment for the purported grant, Ms Khoo was asked by Lai to lend him $6,000.
He lied that he needed the money to pay for his uncle's surgery. She lent him $2,000 instead. Lai, who has not repaid the loan, knew that she would feel obliged to lend him money, given his position in MDA.
