• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PRC PR: We don’t know Singapore laws well

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
[h=2]PRC: We don’t know Singapore laws well[/h]
dmca_protected_sml_120n.png
PostDateIcon.png
April 16th, 2014 |
PostAuthorIcon.png
Author: Editorial

ST_20140416_WSCUSTOMS16_237209e-300x168.jpg
Singapore Customs uncovered attempts by China-born Singaporean Qi Shuai, 28, to pass off shipments of duty-unpaid beer and rice wine as goods such as instant noodles and vinegar. (Photo: SG Customs)

A company director and new citizen, Qi Shuai, 28, was fined $1.95 million on Monday (14 Apr) for importing duty-unpaid liquor. This is the biggest penalty of its kind here in 5 years.
Qi, an ex-PRC, pleaded guilty to 6 charges of importing, possessing and dealing in duty-unpaid beer and rice wine. He also pleaded guilty to a charge of unauthorised breaking of a Singapore Customs seal. 6 more charges were taken into consideration in sentencing.
The total duty and GST evaded on the 28,406 bottles and 13,193 cans of duty-unpaid beer and 9,165 bottles of duty-unpaid rice wine exceeded $198,000.
Singapore Customs began investigations into Qi’s trading company, Tita Logistics, 2 years ago, acting on a tip-off.
A container of goods imported by Qi was declared as soft drinks, instant noodles and vinegar when it actually contained liquor. The container arrived at the Pasir Panjang Terminal on 26 May 2012, and was immediately targeted by Singapore Customs officers for sealing to facilitate further checks on the goods.
However, 2 days later, before the Singapore Customs officers could inspect the sealed container, Qi broke the Customs seal and the officers found that the goods inside the container had been removed. The officers searched the company premises and seized a total of 15,780 bottles and 8,448 cans of duty-unpaid beer, and 1,500 bottles of duty-unpaid rice wine, which were found to have been unloaded from the container. They also seized another 1,766 bottles and 4,025 cans of duty-unpaid beer and 120 bottles of duty-unpaid rice wine, as Qi could not produce documents to show that duty and GST for these goods had been paid.
Less than 2 weeks later on 5 Jun 2012, Qi did it again. Singapore Customs officers checked another consignment of goods imported by Qi, which was again declared as soft drinks, seasoning and seasoning wine. When the officers opened the container, 750 bottles of duty-unpaid rice wine were found instead. The customs officers also found that Qi had sold some 10,860 bottles and 720 cans of duty-unpaid beer and 6,795 bottles of duty-unpaid rice wine between December 2011 and May 2012. Qi could not produce documents to show that duty and GST were paid for the liquor sold.
As Qi is unable or unwilling to pay the $1.95 million fine, he is currently serving a jail sentence of 29 months and 3 weeks.
Mr Liu Jiannan, a Singapore PR, took over as company director of Tita Logistics last month. He told the media in Mandarin, “Business has not been affected and we’re striving to put this episode behind us. We came to Singapore for entrepreneurship and being a new company at the time, we did not know the country’s laws well.”
“We’ve learnt a valuable lesson. We don’t have anything to hide and so we won’t be changing our company name.”
One does not need to know the nitty gritty of the law to know that making a false declaration to the authorities is wrong. Surely Qi knows the difference between soft drinks and instant noodles, and liquor?
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Exactly. Not many people can. That is why TPK industry shot up in the 90s and even people with decent jobs sat in jail for various commercial entities. The same owners and bosses will be in grassroots organisations, sitting in CCCs etc.

Can you earn SGD$1.95M in 20 months ? :p
 

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Exactly. Not many people can. That is why TPK industry shot up in the 90s and even people with decent jobs sat in jail for various commercial entities. The same owners and bosses will be in grassroots organisations, sitting in CCCs etc.

That's right. TPKs will likely avoid the deal if it involves caning.
 

kukubird58

Alfrescian
Loyal
Exactly. Not many people can. That is why TPK industry shot up in the 90s and even people with decent jobs sat in jail for various commercial entities. The same owners and bosses will be in grassroots organisations, sitting in CCCs etc.
hahaha...scroobal, got evidence or not???
got names or not????
u think u can cum and make all sorts of allegations without evidence and retards will lapped it up like a drug....
fucking double standard...
 
Last edited:

GoldenDragon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Fine not worth it and some boss may even prefers to "sit".

Bosses will do the calculations. By them squatting inside, will they lose ground to their rivals? Have they made enough to consider the fine a write-off? Bosses may not be a seasoned criminal. Time behind bars may not be ideal. They rather pay up. Or have TPK cover them. Win-win for tpk and boss.
 

Faidenk

Alfrescian
Loyal
Don't know Singapore laws well, nice try.

The only thing I know the above excuse is a mitigating factor is the bringing in cigarettes bought from a duty-free shop outside of Singapore by a foreigner. No signs displayed that this is prohibited, in any foreign airport. Of course Sinkies are expected to know that, regardless there is no notifications of such.
 
Top