• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

More PMET retrenched. Well done PAP!!

enterprise2

Alfrescian
Loyal
SINGAPORE: More workers were laid off in Singapore in 2012. The figure rose to over 11,000 - 10 per cent more compared to 2011.

Professionals, managers, executives & technicians (PMETs) are also becoming more vulnerable to redundancy.

These were revealed by the Manpower Ministry in its latest report on Redundancy and Re-entry into Employment.

Retrenchments continued to form the bulk of redundancy, affecting almost nine in 10 of workers laid off last year. The remaining were released prematurely from their contracts.

PMETS formed the bulk of workers made redundant.

About 54 per cent of total workers made redundant were displaced from PMET positions last year compared to 42 per cent in 2011.

About seven in 10 of the PMETs who were laid off were from the services sector such as the financial and insurance services. A majority of them were in their 30s and 40s.

The Manpower Ministry said the growing vulnerability of mid-level white collar workers could be due to globalisation and technological innovations, which had previously impacted mainly blue collar manufacturing workers.

The top reason for redundancy was restructuring of business processes for greater efficiency.

Other reasons include poor business and high operating costs amid an economic slowdown.

And economists said redundancy is likely to pick up this year as businesses continue to restructure for higher productivity, in light of the tightening of foreign worker policies.

CIMB Research’s regional economist, Song Seng Wun said: “Rentals being an issue, cost of labour being an issue, so these certainly make businesses look at restructuring. High productivity is so called the "battle-cry" for the government, so collectively this makes businesses looking at restructuring to stay lean and fitter, so redundancy has gone up.”

The rate of re-entry into employment dipped last year, but remained above recessionary levels.

About 68 per cent of those made redundant in the first three quarters of last year got a job by December last year – slightly lower than the 70 per cent in 2011.

Observers said PMETs will continue to see challenges as they try to re-enter the workforce with a growing supply of tertiary graduates.

But it's not all doom and gloom.

Song said: “They will still prefer to hire the cheaper graduates, after all bottom line still matter. PMETs will still be able to find work, although it may take a little longer than their younger and cheaper counterparts.”

Adecco Group’s marketing director, Imran Johri said: “Even if you have been made redundant for whatever reason, you have to take stock of what it is that you are really good at, and then take some courses, continue to study again, invest in your career, invest in your knowledge based, just be better at what you do and certify and brand yourselves as a talent. Because talent is what employers are looking for.”

Observers said job creation will continue in sectors such as healthcare and finance.
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The Manpower Ministry said the growing vulnerability of mid-level white collar workers could be due to globalisation and technological innovations, which had previously impacted mainly blue collar manufacturing workers.

That's total crap talk. If the Manpower Ministry follow up with those companies that lay off the local PMET, they will discover that the PMET positions are now occupied by foreigners.

About 54 per cent of total workers made redundant were displaced from PMET positions last year compared to 42 per cent in 2011.

If that many locals are being laid off, why is there a need to bring in more foreigners?????

About seven in 10 of the PMETs who were laid off were from the services sector such as the financial and insurance services. A majority of them were in their 30s and 40s

These people are supposed to be in their prime earning years but thanks to the PAP mass import of foreigners, their career ended. Instead of career progression, most of them will face career regression - longer hours, lower pay.
 

enterprise2

Alfrescian
Loyal
That's total crap talk. If the Manpower Ministry follow up with those companies that lay off the local PMET, they will discover that the PMET positions are now occupied by foreigners.



If that many locals are being laid off, why is there a need to bring in more foreigners?????



These people are supposed to be in their prime earning years but thanks to the PAP mass import of foreigners, their career ended. Instead of career progression, most of them will face career regression - longer hours, lower pay.

Do you know that our law allows companies to lay off a PMET (or any other worker) and then allow the same companies to fill the laid off position!!!! Most countries do not allow this. Heck! even Malaysia do not allow this. The laid off position is laid off due to reducdancy and that position is supposed to go away. So how come MOM allows this??? Crazy!!
 
Last edited:

Spock

Alfrescian
Loyal
Do you know that our law allows companies to lay off a PMET (or any other worker) and then allow the same companies to fill the laid off position!!!! Most countries do not allow this. Heck! even Malaysia do not allow this. The laid off position is laid off due to reducdancy and that position is supposed to go away. So how come MOM allows this??? Crazy!!

I am even more amazed that SGreans allow the government to let in 40% foreigners to compete with them while getting saddled with crap obligations like CPF, NS, IPPT and ICT. SG probably have the distinction of being number one in having the highest pain threshold. Either that or being the biggest cowards.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I am even more amazed that SGreans allow the government to let in 40% foreigners to compete with them while getting saddled with crap obligations like CPF, NS, IPPT and ICT. SG probably have the distinction of being number one in having the highest pain threshold. Either that or being the biggest cowards.

A rape victim can also enjoy a rape, if she falls in love with the rapist. :wink:
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
I found the comment from Song's and Imran's comments interesting for different reasons.

Song indicates that the retrenchment is drive by the Govt's focus on productivity and the employers are looking for cheaper workers. And Imran's comments about finding jobs sounds easy..

CIMB Research’s regional economist, Song Seng Wun said: “Rentals being an issue, cost of labour being an issue, so these certainly make businesses look at restructuring. High productivity is so called the "battle-cry" for the government, so collectively this makes businesses looking at restructuring to stay lean and fitter, so redundancy has gone up.”

Song said: “They will still prefer to hire the cheaper graduates, after all bottom line still matter. PMETs will still be able to find work, although it may take a little longer than their younger and cheaper counterparts.”

Adecco Group’s marketing director, Imran Johri said: “Even if you have been made redundant for whatever reason, you have to take stock of what it is that you are really good at, and then take some courses, continue to study again, invest in your career, invest in your knowledge based, just be better at what you do and certify and brand yourselves as a talent. Because talent is what employers are looking for.”
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Actually other countries do the same by re-designating the position, the title and scope ( cosmetic changes). Companies in SIngapore on the other hand do it so blatantly.

Do you know that our law allows companies to lay off a PMET (or any other worker) and then allow the same companies to fill the laid off position!!!! Most countries do not allow this. Heck! even Malaysia do not allow this. The laid off position is laid off due to reducdancy and that position is supposed to go away. So how come MOM allows this??? Crazy!!
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
Out of this entire rubbish article, there was only a tiny sliver of truth....

Song said: “They will still prefer to hire the cheaper graduates, after all bottom line still matter. PMETs will still be able to find work, although it may take a little longer than their younger and cheaper counterparts.”
 

soIsee

Alfrescian
Loyal
I am even more amazed that SGreans allow the government to let in 40% foreigners to compete with them while getting saddled with crap obligations like CPF, NS, IPPT and ICT. SG probably have the distinction of being number one in having the highest pain threshold. Either that or being the biggest cowards.

If I can recall that since most Sinkie have NO BALLS.

Whacking them at that spot should produce not much pain if at all.

And my first sentence above has also answered your second question about whether Sinkie are cowards. LOL
 

soIsee

Alfrescian
Loyal
I found the comment from Song's and Imran's comments interesting for different reasons.

Song indicates that the retrenchment is drive by the Govt's focus on productivity and the employers are looking for cheaper workers. And Imran's comments about finding jobs sounds easy..

Interesting my fcuk.

Make Song and Imran redundant and jobless and you will see whether they will eat their own words and obey their own line of reasoning which they offered, when they are talking from the high horse.
 

enterprise2

Alfrescian
Loyal
Actually other countries do the same by re-designating the position, the title and scope ( cosmetic changes). Companies in SIngapore on the other hand do it so blatantly.

Yes u can get around the rule. The difference is how the authorities enforce the rule. MOM and other ministries always say they govern with a 'light touch' allowing companies to get away with murder! Other countries r more protective of their workers.
 

escher

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I am even more amazed that SGreans allow the government to let in 40% foreigners to compete with them while getting saddled with crap obligations like CPF, NS, IPPT and ICT. SG probably have the distinction of being number one in having the highest pain threshold. Either that or being the biggest cowards.

Make sure those maggots in white are all kicked out in 2016

NO MORE OF THEM AND THEIR FUCKING TREATING SINKIES AS 4TH CLASS CITIZENS AND PROMOTING FTS AS 3RD CLASS C ITIZENS


2016 START WITH 1 MAY RALLY AT HONG LIM PARK
GO WITH FAMILY AND FRIENDS AND SUPPORT ALL THAT SPEAK AGAINST THE MAGGOTS IN WHITE AND THEIR FUCKING FTS
 

lesMISERABLES

Alfrescian
Loyal
Interesting my fcuk.

Make Song and Imran redundant and jobless and you will see whether they will eat their own words and obey their own line of reasoning which they offered, when they are talking from the high horse.

Very good rebuttal.

BTW did you realize that this Song guy, who is definitely a senior citizen, is still vain?
 

lesMISERABLES

Alfrescian
Loyal
Below is the front page news of The Straits Times, 26 April 2013. See how Pinky is very anxious to get AEC to work at the earliest opportunity:

PM Lee: Vital for Asean to push integration

GLOBAL uncertainty marked by weak growth and security hot spots in Asia make it all the more vital for Asean to press on with economic integration and forge common positions on key issues such as the South China Sea, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said yesterday at the 22nd Asean Summit in Brunei.

Addressing his counterparts at the leaders' retreat, Mr Lee spelt out why he believed these must be the regional bloc's priorities. He first set out the uncertainties ahead: continued weakness in global economic growth, hot spots that could turn into conflicts if not carefully managed, and the evolving strategic relationship between the United States and China.

Asean must respond to these changes by pressing ahead with its pledge to build an Asean Economic Community (AEC) by 2015 as that will increase the opportunities for its member states to prosper and reduce the likelihood of conflict, he said.

The vision is for Asean - a region of some 600 million people - to form a single market fully plugged into the world economy.

With close to 80 per cent of measures in the AEC blueprint implemented, Asean leaders yesterday acknowledged that the remaining 20 per cent would be difficult as they concern sensitive goods such as rice, and sensitive services such as aviation.

Still, they remain committed to overcoming these challenges for the sake of the region's long-term prosperity, Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah of Brunei said at a press conference wrapping up the summit. Brunei is the Asean chairman this year.

Mr Lee said by delivering on the goals it has set itself, Asean also encourages its dialogue partners to participate in its initiatives for win-win outcomes.

One such initiative is the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), an ambitious free trade area that Asean will start negotiating with six major dialogue partners next month. The six are China, Japan, South Korea, India, Australia and New Zealand.

Calling the RCEP an important initiative, Mr Lee said it is one of the paths to a free trade area in the Asia-Pacific.

The other is the Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, a free trade area under negotiation which involves the US.

"If you have different groupings formed to begin with, then gradually we can merge and rationalise them and we can have broader free trade," he said.

The other priority for Asean is to enhance its credibility, Mr Lee said. This was seriously strained last year when disagreement over the South China Sea issue resulted in foreign ministers failing to issue a joint communique for the first time in 45 years.

Asean must thus "forge pragmatic and common positions on key issues" and stay united to weather structural changes in the region, Mr Lee said. That is the "best way to ensure Asean remains relevant and a neutral platform to engage external powers and to remain at the centre of regional cooperation".

He and other Asean leaders welcomed the common stance taken this year on the South China Sea issue, and the consensus on starting formal talks with China on a binding code of conduct.

Speaking to Singapore reporters on the summit's sidelines, Mr Lee praised Brunei for doing a good job in coordinating the leaders' summit, building a consensus and taking an even-handed view of the issues. After the summit, Mr Lee flew by helicopter to the Temburong region in Brunei to meet SAF troops undergoing jungle training. He returned to Singapore last night.
 
Top