matrix 2 by val valeian

MATRIX 111
Chapter 6
POPULATION MANAGEMENT THROUGH USE OF
BIOLOGICAL ORGANISMS
The Conce~t of "Infectious Disease"
It would appear that the concept of "infectious
disease" is based on some rather archaic research, and has
led to the establishment of dogmatic institutions within
society. Most of the principles which form this concept
have their origin with the work of Louis Pasteur and
Robert Koch, work that was performed in the last half of
the 19th century. It also appears that the general failure
of medicine to deal effectively with the concept of
"disease" has its origin in faulty research.
P7eomorphic Life Forms
One concept that "modern" biological science observes
but refuses to valify within their own minds is the
concept of pleomorphism, which refers the ability of one
species of organism to change into another species or type
of organism. One individual who pointed this out was
Gaston Naessens, a 68 year old Canadian microbiologist,
who discovered that there were smaller living orgamisms
than bacteria (not including viruses) that lived in human
blood. He termed these living organisms "somatids".
Sbmatids are pleomorphic organisms; they can change into
other life forms, such as bacteria and yeasts, during
specific cycles of development. This is an important
factor, because "modern" medical science is only geared
toward addressing "exterior monomorphism" (stable exterior
lifeforms) and not the existence of pleomorphic organisms
that exist in human blood. Naessens made this discovery
around 1949, when he invented a highly advanced dark-field
microscope.
Naessens was not the only one to discover the
existence of other type of lifeforms in human blood.
Pasteurs rival, Antoine Bechamp, termed the organisms he
discovered "micro- zymas". Pasteur, on his deathbed,
seemed to support this view, for he declared that "the
microbe is nothing; the terrain is everything", which
explains why robust immune systems don't get plagues of
exterior diseases. One of Bechamps observations was that
microzymas in dead bacteria were living, and that the
organisms seemed to be of a novel nature. Bechamp also was
the original discoverer of enzymes, but was not credited
with it, since his other work would have eliminated the
deceit and profit associated with "modern" medical
practice; it was better to let his name fade into
non-existence.
Between World War I and World War 11, a German
zoologist named Geunther Enderlein discovered what he
called a "totally new observation of the microbiotic
world" and noted that it featured the phenomena of
pleomorphism. In 1925 pub1 ished The Life Cyc7e of the
Bacteria and outlined what he had discovered. Since he was
the curator of the museum in Berlin, his work should have
been received around the world. It has also been ignored.
Enderlein delineated many different pleomorphic develop-
ment phases of bacteria and showed that illness and
healing processes are bound to exact cyclical and morpho-
logical laws. Enderlein unequivocally asserted that while
different organisms normally live within the body in a
mutually beneficial symbiosis, with severe deteriorization
of the environment of the body (a main result of the
factors thrust on humans discussed in previous chapters)
they develop into disease-producing forms and create what
is essentially a fault in the life process.
Wilhelm Reich observed the existence of "bions" in
living organisms that were apparently the basis of life.
He was imprisoned by the U.S. government and died in
prison in 1964. Most of his books were gathered up by the
government and burned.
Now, the work of Naessens opens new vistas on the work
of Reich, Bechamp, and Enderlein. Canadian officials plan
on putting Naessens, 68, through a third trial for
"practicing medicine without a license". Will Naessens
books also burn?
When todays "researchers" discover microbes that are
associated with cancer states, for example, the microbes
are each given their own name, creating a kind of "Tower
of Babel"; instead of looking upon the appearance of the
alien forms as an indicator of an approaching disease
state, they are held to be the cause of the disease. How
many time have we been told another "cancer virus" has
been discovered, only to have the discovery fade into
obl ivion?
The research of Naessens has been going on for about
50 years. His "somatid" discovery has, like the discover-
ies of others in the same area, the potential to rock the
medical establishment. A tiny drop of blood can reveal the
condition of both the blood and the organism it came from
by the numbers and nature of somatids, which are always
present in the fluids of living creatures in the plant and
animal world. A newborn child's blood is teaming with
active somatids, which in a healthy bloodstream go through
a three-phase life cycle. The somatids, according to

Naessens, are the precursors to DNA and are the link
between energy and matter; Reich held a similar view about
bions when he called them the link between living and
non-living matter.
Whenever healthy blood undergoes deteriorization,
whether through injury, toxins, pollution, drugs or other
external impositions, the normal three-phase life cycle of
the somatid becomes a 16-phase cycle replete with
bacterial and yeast life forms that can actually
parasitize the body, which then becomes a "host". They do
not in fact cause.disease, but mark and identify disease
states and promote disease conditions,
There is a videotape and a book that is available
about the somatids. Both are available from Carotec, PO
Box 75337, St.Pau1, Minnesota 55175. The book is $14.95,
postpaid, and the 55-minute videotape is $55.
The Immunization Gambit
The term "immunization" was derived from the belief
that the injection of a foreign body of infection into the
human system (which already possesses a natural immune
system) will confer life-long immunity from a specific
disease. The word immunization is synonymous with the word
in?oCIijiatjbn.. *Despite this belief, there has always
- existed the observation that immunizations cause disease,
and it is considered heresy in the medical community to
make mention of this fact.
Immunizations also are responsible, according to some
medical experts, for many health problems. Dr. Herbert
Snow, senior surgeon at the Cancer Hospital of London,
once stated that immunization or inoculation causes
permanent disease to the heart. This information,
according to author Eustace Mullins, also exists in the
Library of Congress, buried.
Judic ia 7 Awards For Vaccine-Caused In-iurv
A recent court case in Kansas is only one example of
how "immunizations" can be deadly. An eight year old girl
was awarded over $15 million in damages after receiving a
DPT (diptheria-pertussis-tetanus) immunization which gave
her permanent brain damage at the age of three years old.
The producer of the DPT vaccine, Wyeth Laboratories,
attempted to deny that the damage was caused solely by the
DPT vaccine, but the lawyers proved there case to the
satisfaction of judge and jury (f990 Graham vs Wyeth
Labs).

The magazine Science is well known for its exposition
of scientific discoveries in the areas of medicine. In the
March 4, 1977 issue, researchers Jonas and Darrell Salk
warned that, "Live virus vaccines against influenza or
poliomyelitis may in each instance produce the disease it
intended to prevent ... the live virus against measles and
mumps may produce such side effects as encephalitic (brain
damage ) . "
In the magazine Health Freedom News, July/August 1986,
an article noted that "Vaccine is linked to brain damage.
150 lawsuits are pending against DPT vaccine manufacturers
seeking $1.5 billion in damages."
At the annual AMA Convention in 1955, the Surgeon
General of the United States, Leonard Scheele, said that
"no batch of vaccine can be proven safe before it is given
to children." James R. Shannon of the National Institute
of Health declared that "the only safe vaccine is a
vaccine that is never used. "
In the United States and many other countries, there
are compulsory immunization programs for children. Because
of the financial prospects, physicians are asking that
children be vaccinated earlier in their lives. It is no
small coincidence that the agencies responsible for the
promotion of immunizations, such as the CDC, FDA, AMA and
the WHO are also involved with the large drug firms who. .
make it their business to treat the diseases the vaccines
cause. It is also these same agencies that have drafted
the procedures which forced the states to enact compulsory
immunization legislation. Interestingly enough, in the
early 1900's, physicians were more vocal on the dangers of
the immunization process.
In 1909, Massachusetts enacted Bill No.8, which was an
"Act To Prohibit Compulsory Vaccine"; a legislative
triumph, to be sure. In order to prevent such logical and
rational thought from gaining a foothold, Rockefeller
interests perfected the means for controlling every state
legislature in the United States by setting up the Council
for State Governments in Chicago. No state legislature has
ever failed to follow its dictates.
The Sma 7 7pox Gambit
In the 1800's Edward Jenner "discovered" that cowpox
vaccine would supposedly inoculate persons against the
18th century scourge of smallpox. In fact, by the time
Jenner made this "discovery", smallpox was already on the
wane. After the use of cowpox vaccine became widespread in
England, a smallpox epidemic broke out which killed over
22,000 people. The epidemics became worse each year that

the vaccine was used. In 1872, over 44,000 people were
killed by it. England finally banned the vaccine in 1948.
Japan initiated compulsory vaccine for smallpox in
1872. Within twenty years, there were over 165,000 cases
of smallpox; these resulted in the death of almost 30,000
people.
Germany, during the Nazi regime, instituted compulsory
immunization for diptheria. In 1939 the diptheria rate
went up to 150,000 cases. Norway, which never had
compulsory immunization, had only 50 cases for the same
period. During the ~ranco-Prussian War, every German
soldier was vaccinated against smallpox. The result was
that 53,288 otherwise healthy men developed smallpox.
Po 7 io Vacc ine
The most unknown victim of polio was my own father;
the most famous polio victim was Franklin D. Roosevelt. In
1931, during the annual polio epidemic, Roosevelt
officially endorsed an "immune serum' which was a pre-
cursor of the polio vaccines of the 1950's. The serum was
sponsored by Dr. Lindsly Williams, director of the New
York Academy of Medicine, which was built by the Rocke-
feller and Carnegie Foundations. After Williams announced
during the FDR campaign that Roosevelt was fit to be
President, Williams was appointed the Secretary of Health.
The "immune serum" against polio was known to be dangerous
and worthless when Roosevelt endorsed it. The National
Health Institute of the U.S. Public Health Service had
experimented with monkeys for three years using this
identical serum. The serum was used and several children
died from it.
The New York State Commissioner of Health, who owed
his appointment to Roosevelt, refused to hold hearings to
validate the. serum, while Roosevelt continued to reap the
rewards of "charity" from his Warm Springs Foundation and
his annual birthday balls celebrating the polio epidemic.
In 1948 it was discovered that the intake of sugar had a
direct relation to the virulence of the polio outbreaks.
Cases fell tremendously, after this was briefly publi-
cized. By 1950, people forgot this fact, and the polio
to11 rose to the 1948 level. Polio has increased 700% in
states which have compulsory immunization.
There were a considerable number of lawsuits filed
against drug companies in connection with the various .
types of polio vaccine. A suit involving Type - Sabin
Polio Vaccine was filed against Wyeth Labs was judged in
favor of the plaintiff. A suit against Lederle Lab