• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

what is the best smart way to destory a aircraft carrier???

cheowyonglee

Alfrescian
Loyal
rain all the missile on the aircraft carrier???or use alot of submarine and one shot shoot all the anti ship missile onto the hull and sank it???

or any expert here got some good idea???care to talk about it???i am so curious... :eek:

nimitz9.jpg


fe16cfdd02c9ea44afe531199d89bebb
 
Last edited:

cheowyonglee

Alfrescian
Loyal
japanese previously had the world largest fleet of aircraft carriers!!!with the current china japan situtation, will the japanese start building aircraft carrier to count back the china very first russian bought aircraft carrier???

arizona_memorial_022.jpg
 

moolightaffairs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
just fire one surface to surface super sonic missile with a powerful warhead enough to sink a aircraft carrier. this missile gotta fly very near the surface to avoid detecting by radar.

cheaper option is by submarine firing one torpedo, provided the submarine can get pass the escort warship and enemies submarine.
 

Sperminator

Alfrescian
Loyal
rain all the missile on the aircraft carrier???or use alot of submarine and one shot shoot all the anti ship missile onto the hull and sank it???

or any expert here got some good idea???care to talk about it???i am so curious... :eek:

fe16cfdd02c9ea44afe531199d89bebb

I'm no expert, however, have shared the same curiousity as yours. Here are my take.

Assuming that the Aircraft Carrier's exact location is known, and is in oceans that are no man's land.

Assuming that the above aircraft carrier belongs to USA. Also assuming that the offensive unit is China.

The smartest way to destroy the above aircraft carrier, would be to wait for the aircraft carrier to be within range of the offensive force's aircraft.

Parameters of the offensive force's aircraft should have 1. STEALTH TECHNOLOGY, 2. HIGH MANEUVERABILITY (High Speed, faster than sound), 3. Armed with AIR to SURFACE payloads.

you-can-just-glimpse-the-pilot-in-this-shot-of-the-single-seat-j-20.jpg


If the above assumptions of, AIRCRAFT CARRIER within RANGE of Offensive Force conditions are met.

Scramble a full squadron of 12 offensive aircraft, while travelling at super sonic speeds to target, mach 2.0 top speed to reach target swift and steady, in stealth mode. (perhaps better move in Night, as this will avoid thermal imaging scanners from satellite above, and prevent detection from satellites friendly to AIRCRAFT CARRIER)

Once within 100KM range, 12 offensive aircraft to split up to 4 groups of 3 aircraft, coordinating with 4 groups to fly in from North, South, East, West of Aircraft Carrier.

Once positioned, while still at stealth mode, 12 offensive aircraft start to lock simultaneously at AIRCRAFT CARRIER, and open pod to launch payload. [At this point of time, all 12 aircraft appears in the Aircraft Carrier's RADAR, as stealth is compromised when the base pod is opened, this will trigger high alert from Aircraft Carrier Bridge, and by the time the Aircraft Carrier Captain orders for the anti missile gun to be ready for interception (1 minute time reaction)]

Once locked, all payload fires, and close pod, return to stealth mode, and return to base at mach 2.0 speed, ignoring whether payload is delivered to target.

In the mean time, when the Aircraft Carrier's captain have seen the 12 blips from his radar screen, and he ordered for anti-missile gun for interception, within that crucial 1 minute, the 12 payload would have been fired from 4 different directions....

Introducing, J-20

General characteristics
Crew: one (pilot)
Length: 21.26 m (69 ft 9 in)
Wingspan: 12.88 m (42 ft 3 in)
Height: 4.45 m (14 ft 7 in)
Wing area: 59 m2 (630 sq ft)
Empty weight: 17,000 kg (37,479 lb)
Max takeoff weight: 36,287 kg (80,000 lb) upper estimate[2]
Powerplant: 2 × WS-10G (prototype); WS-15 when J-20 is serving afterburning turbofans dry, 180 kN (40,000 lbf) with afterburner
Maximum speed: Mach 2.0 or less (DSI limit)[91]
Range: 5,500 km (3,418 mi; 2,970 nmi)
Combat range: 2,000 km (1,243 mi; 1,080 nmi)
Service ceiling: 20,000 m (65,617 ft)

That's the reason why USA always park their Aircraft Carriers on the side furthest from China, to stay as far as possible.

And that's the reason why USA dared not go to China's Territorial Sea... because this is what CHINA is capable of today.
 

Attachments

  • you-can-just-glimpse-the-pilot-in-this-shot-of-the-single-seat-j-20.jpg
    you-can-just-glimpse-the-pilot-in-this-shot-of-the-single-seat-j-20.jpg
    63.6 KB · Views: 468

Loofydralb

Alfrescian
Loyal
Either youre stupid or watch too many Bollywood movies.

No one gets close to a US aircraft carrier. Period.
You have satelites and forward AWACs plus air fighter cover 24/7. China better dont dream of taking the US Navy. Better concentrate how to make their cars EuroNCAP 5star ratings first.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Either youre stupid or watch too many Bollywood movies.

No one gets close to a US aircraft carrier. Period.
You have satelites and forward AWACs plus air fighter cover 24/7. China better dont dream of taking the US Navy. Better concentrate how to make their cars EuroNCAP 5star ratings first.



http://articles.businessinsider.com...419_1_anti-ship-defense-system-target-missile
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS-N-22

This baby right here will tear a US aircraft carrier to shreds.
 

Sperminator

Alfrescian
Loyal
Another article worth considering.

Just fire 12 of these simultaneously, and guide them from different directions.

The whole point of discussion is HOW TO DESTROY an AIRCRAFT CARRIER.

Not guaranteeing it's success, as for sure, if you can afford to build an Aircraft Carrier, you are surely capable of owning submarines, Armadas travelling with Aircraft Carriers, having flying radars, and satellites coverage.

Chinese develop anti aircraft carrier ballistic missile.
U. S. Naval Institute ^ | 3-31-2009 | U. S. Naval Institute
Posted on Mon Apr 06 2009 22:58:46 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time) by freedomwarrior998

With tensions already rising due to the Chinese navy becoming more aggressive in asserting its territorial claims in the South China Sea, the U.S. Navy seems to have yet another reason to be deeply concerned.

After years of conjecture, details have begun to emerge of a "kill weapon" developed by the Chinese to target and destroy U.S. aircraft carriers.

First posted on a Chinese blog viewed as credible by military analysts and then translated by the naval affairs blog Information Dissemination, a recent report provides a description of an anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) that can strike carriers and other U.S. vessels at a range of 2000km.

The range of the modified Dong Feng 21 missile is significant in that it covers the areas that are likely hot zones for future confrontations between U.S. and Chinese surface forces.

The size of the missile enables it to carry a warhead big enough to inflict significant damage on a large vessel, providing the Chinese the capability of destroying a U.S. supercarrier in one strike.

Because the missile employs a complex guidance system, low radar signature and a maneuverability that makes its flight path unpredictable, the odds that it can evade tracking systems to reach its target are increased. It is estimated that the missile can travel at mach 10 and reach its maximum range of 2000km in less than 12 minutes.

Supporting the missile is a network of satellites, radar and unmanned aerial vehicles that can locate U.S. ships and then guide the weapon, enabling it to hit moving targets.

ASBM is said to be a modified DF-21 The ASBM is said to be a modified DF-21

While the ASBM has been a topic of discussion within national defense circles for quite some time, the fact that information is now coming from Chinese sources indicates that the weapon system is operational. The Chinese rarely mention weapons projects unless they are well beyond the test stages.

If operational as is believed, the system marks the first time a ballistic missile has been successfully developed to attack vessels at sea. Ships currently have no defense against a ballistic missile attack.

Along with the Chinese naval build-up, U.S. Navy officials appear to view the development of the anti-ship ballistic missile as a tangible threat.

After spending the last decade placing an emphasis on building a fleet that could operate in shallow waters near coastlines, the U.S. Navy seems to have quickly changed its strategy over the past several months to focus on improving the capabilities of its deep sea fleet and developing anti-ballistic defenses.

As analyst Raymond Pritchett notes in a post on the U.S. Naval Institute blog:

"The Navy's reaction is telling, because it essentially equals a radical change in direction based on information that has created a panic inside the bubble. For a major military service to panic due to a new weapon system, clearly a mission kill weapon system, either suggests the threat is legitimate or the leadership of the Navy is legitimately unqualified. There really aren't many gray spaces in evaluating the reaction by the Navy…the data tends to support the legitimacy of the threat."

In recent years, China has been expanding its navy to presumably better exert itself in disputed maritime regions. A recent show of strength in early March led to a confrontation with an unarmed U.S. ship in international waters.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Nobody in his right mind will spend $1B or more to build a carrier if it is going to be easily destroyed. No aircraft carrier has fallen to a single offensive. It requires sustained period of attacks and or engagement with superior numbers to draw out its escorts and air cover. This was proven in WWII. With satellites and monitoring of missiles, any launch would raise defences etc.
 

Sperminator

Alfrescian
Loyal
If the objective is to ensure, and guarantee the destruction of the aircraft carrier.

Launching 12 DF-21 (Dong Feng 21 super sonic surface to surface anti aircraft carrier missiles)

Scrambling 12 J-20s for simultaneous strikes.

This will guarantee total destruction to the Aircraft Carrier... reducing air superiority to minimal.

With only 1 minute reaction time for the Bridge Captain to react, the only thing he can do is pray.... 24 missiles coming your way at the crucial 1 minute...
 

singveld

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
i suggest you tell your chinese master, to stop blowing hot air, china navy is a flicking joke.
 

Sperminator

Alfrescian
Loyal
i suggest you tell your chinese master, to stop blowing hot air, china navy is a flicking joke.

the day when China become global super power, I think it'll really have a huge perception shift in many people... by the way, China was already a global super power only less than 500 years ago. China is only reclaiming it's title of Global Super Power.

And I suggest you visit China more often to see the changes in only a few years.
 

Television

Alfrescian
Loyal
the day when China become global super power, I think it'll really have a huge perception shift in many people... by the way, China was already a global super power only less than 500 years ago. China is only reclaiming it's title of Global Super Power.

And I suggest you visit China more often to see the changes in only a few years.

"Reclaiming its title of Global Super Power" <---Your being sarcastic right? and By the way China will never be a global super power, Stop being delusional. That self coined phrase "Dragon Century" is a joke and By the way, No one wants to live in a Chinese Century, ABSOLUTELY NO ONE. Don't get carried away.
 
Last edited:

Sperminator

Alfrescian
Loyal
"Reclaiming its title of Global Super Power" <---Your being sarcastic right? and By the way China will never be a global super power, Stop being delusional. That self coined phrase "Dragon Century" is a joke.

Hello Television, I would like to learn from you why China will NEVER be a global super power?

Please share with me, I truly like to learn.
 
Top