• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Why Ho Yeow Kwai bo taiji bo tiok charge ??

C

chowcheebye

Alfrescian
Loyal
Anybody else find this very strange? any legal experts care to explain? Isnt she considered an accessory/partner in crime too? She is the recipient/beneficiary of the entire $24M ill-gotten gains knowingly. And being in a fiduciary relationship with her husband, its an understatement to say she must have masterminded and participated in it too. If those 4 lesser staff can kana, how come this fugly butch is immune from justice ??
 
Last edited:
C

chowcheebye

Alfrescian
Loyal
garlic said:
prob wait till she is back to charge her.
Click to expand...

Cant be leh, we are talking about 2 years of very thorough investigation started in 2010, only 5 of them named. The pecking order should be, Kong Hee=ace of spades, Yeow Kwai=queen of heart, the other 4 are just small numbers
 
C

chowcheebye

Alfrescian
Loyal
hello friend, in court to accompany hubby only hor? as spectator, as witness, as escort ....but not charged, big difference hor?
 
Jumong

Jumong

Alfrescian
Loyal
Yeow Kwai is probably spared because she does not owe a fiduciary duty to the church in the sense that she is not sitting in the board of directors.
 
C

chowcheebye

Alfrescian
Loyal
yes but she is a member of the church charity committee too and more importantly, her relationship with her husband. this is a very clearcut case of following the money trail, given her position and nature of relationship with husband, its very obvious the whole hanky panky has been hatched by the hubby-wife crooks tagteam
 
S

soIsee

Alfrescian
Loyal
chowcheebye said:
Anybody else find this very strange? any legal experts care to explain? Isnt she considered an accessory/partner in crime too? She is the recipient/beneficiary of the entire $24M ill-gotten gains knowingly. And being in a fiduciary relationship with her husband, its an understatement to say she must have masterminded and participated in it too. If those 4 lesser staff can kana, how come this fugly butch is immune from justice ??
Click to expand...

Horse face need Con hee to implicate her but would this ace of spade con man , do it to lessen his involvment?

No, this con man wants to put out a false message that 'he does not have the heart' to do so.

As for his other devislish helpers, their claw prints are all found on the money trail!

Horse did not leave any hoof imprint so to nap her, you need real evidence besides pillow talk & hear say of the obvious!
 
C

chowcheebye

Alfrescian
Loyal
she is the recepient cum beneficiary of the entire sum you know? and as the wife, can she claim that she doesnt know where the money came from? so she can just pak pak karchng and run road just like that ah?
 
Jumong

Jumong

Alfrescian
Loyal
chowcheebye said:
yes but she is a member of the church charity committee too and more importantly, her relationship with her husband. this is a very clearcut case of following the money trail, given her position and nature of relationship with husband, its very obvious the whole hanky panky has been hatched by the hubby-wife crooks tagteam
Click to expand...

You're probably correct. Section 109 deals with the abetment, and it doesn't require the existence of a fiduciary relationship.
 
C

chowcheebye

Alfrescian
Loyal
murphy said:
Bargain? K H takes the rap n spare his wife
Click to expand...

if 2 persons commit a crime, taking the rap doesnt apply. she cannot claim to NOT know where the $24M come from, we are not talking about $240 or $2400 here but systematic siphoning of millions over a very long period of time
 
S

shawna

Alfrescian
Loyal
10 years she lived in LA song song not sure whether she pursued her singing career there or just eng eng party party there. by rite she shd be charged as well for receiving public money to support her lifestyle. if i were the prosecutor, i wd challenge the court to bring her name in as well... misappropriation of public money for her own lifestyle is a major crime committed.
 
laksaboy

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
sun-ho.jpg


Why did you call me 何妖怪?
I sing and dance to bring joy to the masses,
and glorify Jesus' holy name.
 
C

chowcheebye

Alfrescian
Loyal
lets say if the 30,000 fanatics say that they gave their consent for their money to be used to maintain the Yeow Kwai's lavish lifestyle, what then? still guilty or not? :rolleyes:
 
S

shawna

Alfrescian
Loyal
chowcheebye said:
lets say if the 30,000 fanatics say that they gave their consent for their money to be used to maintain the Yeow Kwai's lavish lifestyle, what then? still guilty or not? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

when a prosecutor charges the offender, he/she has to provide evidence to support his/her defence. the onus is on the offender.
 
Narong Wongwan

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
chowcheebye said:
she is the recepient cum beneficiary of the entire sum you know? and as the wife, can she claim that she doesnt know where the money came from? so she can just pak pak karchng and run road just like that ah?
Click to expand...

SIA man, APB man their wives all bo tai chee also....SIA man's wife even helped him conceal the money.
Most kena sue for return of monies...probably will come later dependent on outcome of the case first.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top