• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Statement from Commisioner of Charities regarding CHC

wikiphile

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
http://app1.mcys.gov.sg/PressRoom/InquiryfoundmisconductandmismanagementinCHC.aspx


Background

The City Harvest Church is a registered charity since 1993. As at December 2009, the Charity had a congregation size of about 33,000 people. The congregation comprised approximately 728 Executive Members with voting powers, whilst the remaining are Ministry and Ordinary Members.

Based on the Charity’s financial statements for the financial year ended 31 October 2009, the Charity’s income amounted to about $72 million whilst expenses amounted to about $48 million. Its net assets are estimated at $103 million.

In early 2010, the COC received complaints alleging the misuse of the Charity’s funds and informed the CAD, when it assessed that some of these financial transactions may need to be investigated by the CAD.

On 31 May 2010, the COC and the CAD commenced investigations into financial transactions involving several individuals and companies, related to or connected to the Charity. Separately, the COC has decided to take action under the Charities Act.

(A) Misrepresentation on the Use of the Charity’s Funds


In 2002, the Charity’s founders, Kong Hee and Ho Yeow Sun (“Sun Ho”), embarked on a “Crossover Project” [“the Project”], with the purported intention to use Sun Ho’s secular music to connect with people and reach out to non-Christians.



In 2003, an individual alleged in the media that the Charity was funding Sun Ho’s music career. This attracted public attention. This individual eventually issued a public apology and retracted his allegations. During that period, the Charity had faced media scrutiny over the allegations. Subsequently, the Charity issued press statements and made several representations to its members to state that they had not funded Sun Ho’s music career.



Despite the representations made by the Charity and unknown to the Executive Members, the Charity’s funds were used to fund the Project. Over a period of 3 years (2007 to 2010), at least $23 million was used. However, during this period of time, the Executive members were not told of the actual purpose of the use of these funds.



(B) Use of the Charity’s Funds to Fund the Project



Between December 2007 and May 2010, the Charity’s funds were used to finance the Project under the guise of donations to its affiliated church in Kuala Lumpur, known as the City Harvest Church Kuala Lumpur [“CHCKL”]. The funds were then transmitted by CHCKL to support the Project in the United States. During this period, at least $2.1 million was transferred from the Charity to CHCKL to fund the Project. The Inquiry revealed that Kong Hee, Tan Ye Peng, Kelvin Teo Meng How, Tan Shao Yuen Sharon and Serina Wee Gek Yin were aware of the true purpose of the donations to CHCKL.



In addition, donations and tithes to the Charity were transferred into a private fund known as the Multi-Purpose Account [“MPA”], administered by Serina Wee Gek Yin (the Charity’s ex-Finance Manager and Executive member) and Tan Su Pheng Jacqueline (former Personal Assistant to Kong Hee, current contract staff and Executive member of the Charity). Monies in this account were used to fund the Project. For the period April 2007 to March 2010, the funds were used for purported expenditures of Kong Hee and Sun Ho, amounting to approximately $600,000 and $3 million respectively. Selected donors were asked to transfer their contributions originally meant for the Charity’s “Arise and Build” campaign to the MPA. Some members ceased or reduced their regular tithes to the Charity after they contributed funds to the MPA. Apart from this small group of members, the existence of the MPA was not made known to the Charity’s members. There was even an attempt to conceal the existence of this Account by closing the joint bank account and dealing only in cash transactions, which was kept in a safe at the Charity.



In or around April 2009, a plan was conceptualised by Tan Ye Peng, Chew Eng Han, Serina Wee Gek Yin and Tan Shao Yuen Sharon to transfer monies amounting to $600,000 donated by Wahju Hanafi to the Charity’s Building Fund via a “refund” of Building Fund donations into the MPA to meet some funding needs of the Project, which included US$100,000 to finance a media team from Singapore to publicise and write about Sun Ho’s music career in the United States. Inquiry revealed that the Charity had drafted letters from Wahju Hanafi and one other person indicating that their donations to the Charity were intended for specific Pastors and employees of the Charity as love gifts. It was then arranged for these said Pastors and employees to receive the “refund” as love gifts and immediately thereafter to deposit these love gifts into the MPA. The Inquiry further revealed evidence which strongly suggests that the “refund” letters were backdated, i.e. the letters were dated close to or on the date of the donations and one of the letters was dated before the date of the donations.



(C) Schemes to Avoid Disclosure on Related Party Transactions



Between 2006 and 2008, Kong Hee’s company sold over $3 million worth of merchandise to the Charity. The Inquiry also revealed that Kong Hee did not disclose his interests in these related party transactions in the Charity’s financial statements. In 2008, Kong Hee “refunded” royalties to the Charity amounting to approximately $770,000 from the sale of his merchandise to the Charity from 2006 to 2008. The return of these royalties was ostensibly motivated by concerns that the Charity’s auditors would require Kong Hee’s royalties to be disclosed as related party transactions. The amount “refunded” by Kong Hee was concealed as “sales discount” given to the Charity. Subsequently, the purported refunds were reimbursed to Kong Hee from the MPA and from CHCKL. Kong Hee’s “refund” of royalties to the Charity was therefore cosmetic and he was instead never “out of pocket”. The Inquiry revealed that the individuals who were aware of the above avoidance in disclosure were Kong Hee, Tan Ye Peng, Kelvin Teo Meng How, Tan Shao Yuen Sharon, Serina Wee Gek Yin and Tan Su Pheng Jacqueline.



(D) Governance and Control Issues



Evidence suggested that certain members of the Charity’s Board have been less than prudent in the discharge of their duties toward the Charity and its members. For example, the appointment of Investment Manager, Chew Eng Han’s investment company, was not properly tabled and discussed by the Charity’s Board.



The Inquiry further revealed that when Chew Eng Han suffered financial difficulties, the Charity refunded donations amounting to about $338,000 to him in two separate tranches, i.e. $240,000 and $98,000. However, in respect of the $98,000, the Charity’s Board only gave approval for the refund of donations to Chew Eng Han 9 months after the refunds were made.



The poor corporate governance in the Charity contributed, at least in part, to the fact that the Charity was able to maintain the above-mentioned activities for the past 3 years.

The Commissioner of Charities (COC) instituted an Inquiry into the City Harvest Church (the Charity) on 31 May 2010 under the Charities Act. Concurrently, the Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) commenced investigations into financial transactions involving several individuals and companies, related or connected to the Charity. Both the COC and CAD have since concluded its Inquiry and investigations, respectively. Separately and independently from CAD, COC has decided to take action under the Charities Act.



COC’s Inquiry revealed misconduct and mismanagement in the administration of the Charity, particularly in relation to the funds that were in the Building Fund which had been raised and earmarked for specific purposes. Financial irregularities of at least $23 million from the Charity’s funds have been discovered. These funds were used with the purported intention to finance Ho Yeow Sun’s secular music career to connect with people. There was a concerted effort to conceal this movement of funds from its stakeholders. Refer to Annex for the details of the misconduct and mismanagement.



The COC is concerned about the misconduct and mismanagement in the administration of the Charity. Under the Charities Act and with the consent of the Attorney-General, the COC has suspended the following persons from the exercise of their office or employment as governing board members, officers, agents or employees of the Charity with immediate effect:



Kong Hee1 (Member of the Charity’s Board and Executive Member);
Lam Leng Hung2 (Chairman of the Charity’s Board, Trustee, Agent and Executive Member);
Tan Ye Peng3 (Vice-Chairman of the Charity’s Board, Trustee, Employee, Agent and Executive Member);
Tan Shao Yuen Sharon (Employee and Executive Member);
Chew Eng Han (Agent and Executive Member);
Ho Yeow Sun (Agent and Executive Member);
Kelvin Teo Meng How (Agent, Employee and Executive Member); and
Tan Su Pheng Jacqueline (Employee and Executive Member).

The COC has also suspended the above-named individuals from their Executive Memberships in the Charity with immediate effect.



The COC will also consider taking further courses of action under the Charities Act against these individuals in order to protect the charitable property of the Charity. This may include the removal of these persons from their office as trustee, governing board members, officers, agents or employees of the Charity.



For so long as these persons are suspended, they will be prohibited from taking part or being involved in managing the Charity, representing the Charity on any matters, or attending any of the Charity’s Annual General Meetings, Extraordinary General Meetings and Board meetings.



The normal services of the Charity can continue as usual.



1Kong Hee was the President of the Charity’s Board (till 10 April 2011).

2Lam Leng Hung was the Treasurer of the Charity’s Board, from 7 March 2010 to 10 April 2011.

3Tan Ye Peng was the Vice President of the Charity’s Board till 10 April 2011 [thereafter he was re-designated as Vice-Chairman].
 

streetsmart73

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
hi there


1. tsk tsk tsk!
2. some hard truth to stomach.
3. playing evil in the house of the LORD!
 

elephanto

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The Bible can be a neutral supply of out-of-context verses to suit the Charismatic Leader's infinite ability to justify, interpret and pronounce.

At the end of the day, the flesh corrupts.

Works spring forth from Self - Self Righteousness.

'the Cultural Mandate', 'The Market Place' etc .... Pseudo marketing strategies for a 'church builder'.

God - in all the forms civilization perceive him to be - the Force, Tao, cosmic force etc - is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow.

In His Name, everything is done.

Next to the Savior, Apostle Paul is arguably the most influential messenger of God - his doctrine of Grace ( what law-based adherents called cheap grace) in Acts, Romans, Galatians, Ephesians, ... Loosely termed the Epistles of Paul Sould be studied closely.

CHC's founders and leaders are not unique - the Bakker's PTL ' Praise the Lord' ministries in the 80s/90s in USA are also proof that the Root of Sin is in the Law - the flesh will always do what you know not you must do... Paul's 'wretched man' sayings are ever more poignant.

May the sheep & the multitude of Harvest believers have a divine dose of Godly Revelation beyond their sentimental attachment and worldly adulation of their leaders.
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
The statement from the Commissioner reveals a pattern of organised fraud of a high and sophisticated level. I am also surprised how greedy this chap is when after the refund, he got the money back by a different vehicle. Also involves using foreign vehicle and carousel fraud. This guy is good.

Knowing the competency of law enforcement in this country to white collar crime, I suspect that a high ranking insider has blown the whistle. I am also not ruling out that a foreign forensic accounting agency was used smilar to our monk. For the monk they used an Australian agency.

It also tells that Commissioner of Charity does not have the means to carry out the jon despite after 2 major events. Would strongly suggest where charities are concerned the level of scrutiny should be much higher.
 

elephanto

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The statement from the Commissioner reveals a pattern of organised fraud of a high and sophisticated level. I .....
It also tells that Commissioner of Charity does not have the means to carry out the jon despite after 2 major events. Would strongly suggest where charities are concerned the level of scrutiny should be much higher.
very true...

Is it just coincidence that this year is the year of high profile expose - from sr leaders of CNB SCDF MFA MOE Principals/teachers, high society scions like Shaw / Woofles Wu etc etc ...

Or simply ' the Law shall take its own course... '

No wonder cynicism is the high order of the day for Spore Society.

It's tough to stick to one's comvictions with fidelity when all around you, the evidence seems to suggest it is only a matter of how well you can remain uncaught and how far up the food chain you are.

To paraphrase the Sub Prime Crisis buzzword : too big to fail....

So AIA can be brought down, CitiGroup cannot be allowed to collapse, stat board chiefs and megachurch leaders are still relatively touchable ...

What about even higher ups?

Is CAD CPIB etc that fearless in the pursuit of justice or is it just highly judicious application of justice?

There is no answer that can satisfy.

That is why when societal psyche and cynicism is incurable, only revolution aka Arab Spring, Fall of Berlin Wall seems the only way out....
 
Top