Yes of course, in the final analysis its always safety before comfort and economy of operations.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
MALAYSIAN Airlines flight en route to China is missing.
- Thread starter GoldenPeriod
- Start date
Remember the frog aircraft that crash in south Atlantic a few years back? Any chance same type of accident? Although I remember the frog pilot did send out distress calls.
On MAS?
On autopilot.
equipment failure, fake parts used.
http://flightaware.com/live/flight/MAS370/history/20140307/1635Z/WMKK/ZBAA
Maybe should invite those Non Malay/muslims to hear friday jumaat sermon. Then they believe. Better still write to MUIS and request for the script.
wah powerful mind reader like you can read the minds of what other m&ds are doing.
Unfortunately most are mat rempits or uncles going too slow on motorbikes. and therefore got shoved off the narrow road by bigger cars.
That one due to speed reading malfunction. Caused plane to stall.
Hi, that particular flight flew through a big band of really bad weather and had issues related to it. The weather this time round does not appear to be anything like what Air France experienced. This time of the year the weather over the South China Sea is fairly benign until the typhoon season begins end June.
So it is unlikely that MAS had the same kind of incident.
So it is unlikely that MAS had the same kind of incident.
Many years back, somebody from maintenance tried several times to sabo MAS planes. Then when Qantas sent their planes to MAS for maintenance,same thing happened.
The reading malfunction was due to icing as they flew through the bad weather. Icing can cause serious safety issues.
you shd appreciate Chinks treat Javanese Mat like you as trading partners. Chinks can take over Mats lands anytime. Perhaps long time ago Chinks already see you Javanese Mat lazy and dumb and no threats to Chinks.
Chinks teach you to make money, educate you but you Javanese Mats also cannot think? Probably give up on you mat long time ago.
Javanese Mats should thanks Chinks take care of you and stopped West White shits like Pommies to take over your land and destroyed the whole Mat people.
Look at Australia, only 200,000 aboriginals left in Australia. Pushed and grouped all of them into NT and feed them with alcohols and drugs and no jobs there.
So Mats, be grateful to Chinks.
Chinks are not squatters, Chink build houses for you to squat instead. See you cannot learn to do simple biz, make you Mat drivers, clean jambans and dig roads- kiau tor.
Chinks teach you to make money, educate you but you Javanese Mats also cannot think? Probably give up on you mat long time ago.
Javanese Mats should thanks Chinks take care of you and stopped West White shits like Pommies to take over your land and destroyed the whole Mat people.
Look at Australia, only 200,000 aboriginals left in Australia. Pushed and grouped all of them into NT and feed them with alcohols and drugs and no jobs there.
So Mats, be grateful to Chinks.
Chinks are not squatters, Chink build houses for you to squat instead. See you cannot learn to do simple biz, make you Mat drivers, clean jambans and dig roads- kiau tor.
Last edited:
Have been reading a lot from the aviation forums and have a couple of questions.
1) This aircraft was involved in an accident in Shanghai where the wing tip was damaged (rip off as I recall). With poor maintenance, could this have been a contributory factor?
2) The aircraft lost radar contact at cruising altitude with no mention of a distress call being made by either pilot. Is this not really odd?
Statistically, most incidents happen during taxiing, take-off and landing but this happened two hours into the flight and presumably on auto-pilot.
Hoping for the best but unfortunately preparing for the worst...
1) This aircraft was involved in an accident in Shanghai where the wing tip was damaged (rip off as I recall). With poor maintenance, could this have been a contributory factor?
2) The aircraft lost radar contact at cruising altitude with no mention of a distress call being made by either pilot. Is this not really odd?
Statistically, most incidents happen during taxiing, take-off and landing but this happened two hours into the flight and presumably on auto-pilot.
Hoping for the best but unfortunately preparing for the worst...
1. This is quite unlikely because a wing tip damage is usually not a serious structural damage and I would think that they would have also inspected the wing root to see if it were affected.
2. If the pilots recognised that there was a serious issue and that aircraft safety was going to be compromised then they would have made the Mayday or distress call. Not to have done this would point to the event being very very sudden such that the pilots couldnt make the call.
2. If the pilots recognised that there was a serious issue and that aircraft safety was going to be compromised then they would have made the Mayday or distress call. Not to have done this would point to the event being very very sudden such that the pilots couldnt make the call.
Were you raped or sexually abused???
He raped you?
Similar threads
