• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Writ of Summons : Prisoner abuse and cover up....

TopSage

Alfrescian
Loyal
Guy was in prison with 3 months left for a petty crime.

This is the writ of summons filed by Ravi from evidence gathered from witnesses. There was no interest to uncover wrong doing on their side and rectify deficiency in the prisons system. Basic monitoring system should be in place to prevent abuse as it is a know established fact that a prisoner-warden setup always leads to abuse unless preventive and monitoring measures are in place. It is negligent not to put in place such measures. These people are in prison for petty crimes, they are sentence to jail not death. We cannot let it happen again. Whether Ravi wins this case or not, it is negligence so long as there are no preventive measures in our prison system. There should be no possible of cover up because technology is there to prevent abuse.

In.earlier.investigation. were inmates interviewed orr did they just take statments from warden....if that is the case. the inveatigation was incompetently done.in which case investigators should be sacked
On 27 September 2010, the following officers of the Prison Service were on duty at Changi Prison Complex, Institution A4:

Deputy Superintendent of Prison Lim Kwo Yin Darius (“DSP Darius”);
Deputy Superintendent of Prison Harry Yap Hong Hock (“DSP Harry”);
Assistant Superintendent of Prison Teo Chong Lian Dylan (“ASP Dylan”);
Chief Warden Daljit Singh S/O Gurbachan Singh (“CW Daljit”);
Chief Warden Rozairudin Bin Zaini (“CW Rozairudin”);
Sergeant Yen Chia Hsien (“Sgt Yen”);
Sergeant Tan Heng Chye Marcus (“Sgt Marcus”);
Sergeant Lee Fangwei Jonathan (“Sgt Jonathan”);
Corporal Anand Pereira (“Cpl Anand”); and
Corporal Robby Bin Sulaiman (“Cpl Robby”)
On that day, sometime between 7.30 am and 7.45 am, Sgt Yen commenced his morning shift duties at Changi Prison Complex, Institution A4. While in the course of carrying out his duties, Sgt Yen arrived at cell number 555 and saw Dinesh. Sgt Yen then uttered the words “Dinesh, long time never see you. Now you come back, you become a suicidal watch”.

These words were heard by Dinesh and was misunderstood by Dinesh to mean that Sgt Yen was partial against him. Dinesh asked Sgt Yen a question, the gist of which was, “Sir, you got something against me is it?” Dinesh then turned away from Sgt Yen and, as he turned away, he gestured his middle finger at Sgt Yen and uttered a vulgarity. Sgt Yen verbally reported the Incident to DSP Darius. However, no written report was lodged.

Despite the fact that Dinesh was not allowed to go to the outdoor yard, he was deliberately let out at about 9.45 am. Because of the earlier incident, as Dinesh was returning from the outdoor yard to his cell at about 10.45 am, he was accosted by Sgt Jonathan and then tackled by Sgt Yen onto the ground.

While on the ground, Sgt Yen restrained Dinesh. At this juncture, CW Daljit approached Dinesh (who was still on the ground and restrained by Sgt Yen) and attempted to lock Dinesh’s arms. DSP Darius also approached Dinesh and he restrained Dinesh’s lower limbs. Sgt Jonathan deployed the Oleoresin Capsicum Delivery System (“OCDS”) and applied the same onto Dinesh’s face. Sgt Jonathan then placed both his knees against the sides of Dinesh’s head and applied pressure. Consequently, Dinesh was unable to breathe. At the same time, Dinesh was also weakened by the OCDS. His eyes became red and there was mucus coming out from his nose. All these physical symptoms were ignored. He was then handcuffed to his back and placed in a prone position.

Subsequently, Cpl Robby, Cpl Anand and CW Rozairudin also approached Dinesh. Together with Sgt Yen and CW Daljit, they restrained and controlled Dinesh’s body and his movement including through the use of joint-locks to cause Dinesh to suffer pain. They were then directed to lead Dinesh to the outdoor yard. After a few steps, Dinesh was put into a prone position again on the ground. Dinesh was then lifted up and brought to the outdoor yard. Dinesh was profusely apologizing and begging for leniency from the officers but his pleas were ignored.

When Dinesh was brought to the outdoor yard, DSP Harry and DSP Darius were also there. Dinesh continued to be restrained and made to suffer pain from joint-locks applied by CW Daljit, Sgt Yen, Sgt Jonathan, Cpl Robby, Cpl Anand and/or CW Rozairudin. Dinesh was then drooling from his mouth. Again, this physical symptom was ignored. Dinesh was brought to stand in front of two rows of inmates and then instructed to continuously shout (each time louder than the previous) using vulgar language in Hokkien - directed at a notorious gang.

Subsequently, Dinesh was brought from the outdoor yard to a common area known as “Sally Port”. At “Sally Port”, Dinesh was again put in a prone position on the ground. While on the ground, Dinesh continued to be restrained and made to suffer pain from joint-locks applied by CW Daljit, Sgt Yen, Sgt Jonathan, Cpl Robby, Cpl Anand and/or CW Rozairudin.

Dinesh was then lifted up from the ground and led to Stair Core 3 (which is a staircase landing) for relocation to the Disciplinary Housing Unit (“DHU”). ASP Dylan was also at Stair Core 3. Dinesh continued to be restrained by CW Daljit, Sgt Yen, Sgt Jonathan, Cpl Robby, Cpl Anand and/or CW Rozairudin. Dinesh was walking unsteadily and perspiring profusely. Again, these physical symptoms were ignored.

On level 2 of Stair Core 3, Dinesh was put onto the ground again. At this juncture, Dinesh had become physically very weak. Again, this physical symptom was ignored.

Dinesh was then lifted up again and led into cell number 1 in the DHU. Sgt Marcus opened the door to DHU Cell Number 1. Inside DHU Cell Number 1, Dinesh was again put onto the floor in a prone position. While on the ground, Dinesh continued to be restrained and made to suffer pain from joint-locks applied by CW Daljit, Sgt Yen, Sgt Jonathan, Cpl Robby, Cpl Anand and/or CW Rozairudin. ASP Dylan and DSP Darius also arrived in DHU Cell Number 1.

In DHU Cell Number 1, while on the ground in the prone position that he was put in, Dinesh was moaning softly. His eyes were closed and motionless. Again, these physical symptoms were ignored. At the same time, Dinesh continued to be restrained and made to suffer pain from joint-locks applied by CW Daljit, Sgt Yen, Sgt Jonathan, Cpl Robby, Cpl Anand and/or CW Rozairudin.

While in DHU Cell Number 1, one of the officers then poured water on Dinesh’s face but there was no response from him. More water was poured onto Dinesh’s face. However, there was still no response from Dinesh. DSP Darius then gave instructions to all the officers in DHU Cell Number 1 to leave the cell, leaving Dinesh unattended.

Subsequently, DSP Darius returned to DHU Cell Number 1 and was unable to detect any pulse on Dinesh. Dinesh had died.
 
Last edited:

TopSage

Alfrescian
Loyal
Did.the govt lie and cover up?
“Our clients are also seeking aggravated damages in addition to the general damages because the actions by the officers were not merely a negligent act but deliberate and intentional. This is diametrically opposed to the government’s position."

The story that Dinesh died by lying in the prone position
defies.logic and common sense....the integrity
of the govt is in question here and their.lack of pursuit of the truth speak poorly of their morality
 

csi88

Alfrescian
Loyal
Ravi hope u can seek justice for the dead inmate family

Looking at the accounts of events leading to the death of the prison inmate,howcome only 1 officer is charged????
 

TopSage

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Ravi hope u can seek justice for the dead inmate family

Looking at the accounts of events leading to the death of the prison inmate,howcome only 1 officer is charged????
1. are there cctv footage to review
to ascertain the truth?

2. If not, how did the govt arrive at its version
of events? did it come mainly from the accused?

3. were other witnesses like other inmates interviewed?
this is important as these pple are not involved ....
if you question.only perpetuators of abuse...where will we be today

4. the govt version that the victim suffocated
because he was left in the prone position requires strong
proof as it defy common.sense.

5. the govt claims that it is of high.integrity
where is the rigor in this case? a full coroner
investigation was not even conducted.
 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Ravi hope u can seek justice for the dead inmate family

Whole prison so big, no cctv footage? They even have cctv in HDB flat lifts ok? lol
 

blissquek

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Ravi hope u can seek justice for the dead inmate family

Whole prison so big, no cctv footage? They even have cctv in HDB flat lifts ok? lol

If 6 wardens restrained him on that fateful day, the court should ask these men to give evidence and take their sworn statements.

I, too find this case needs more examination....
 

KuanTi01

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Did.the govt lie and cover up?


The story that Dinesh died by lying in the prone position
defies.logic and common sense....the integrity
of the govt is in question here and their.lack of pursuit of the truth speak poorly of their morality

In a morally corrupt system, the last thing they want is to have a Commission of Inquiry. Even a simpleton knows there is more than meets the eyes.
So many brutes all ganged up against a helpless prisoner who was literally begging for mercy. Reading the story can get heart pain. How the deceased must have suffered at the hands of these sadists in uniform! Even a dog deserves better treatment. One human life extinguished and only one singled out for punishment. What about the rest of the gang? Continue to be sadists?
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
In a morally corrupt system, the last thing they want is to have a Commission of Inquiry. Even a simpleton knows there is more than meets the eyes.
So many brutes all ganged up against a helpless prisoner who was literally begging for mercy. Reading the story can get heart pain. How the deceased must have suffered at the hands of these sadists in uniform! Even a dog deserves better treatment. One human life extinguished and only one singled out for punishment. What about the rest of the gang? Continue to be sadists?

Young sinkie men are treated as slaves.
Common sinkies are peasants.
FT dogs favored over PMET sinkies.
What's a sinkie convict's life worth here? Practically worthless.
 

tyudm

Alfrescian
Loyal
Why MHA is commenting on the writ filed by Dinesh's family is untrue?

Which allegation is true under writ of summons filed?
If all allegations were true in writs why waste time and money on Kong Hee & the gang?
Shouldn't MHA respect the law of the country and defend it in court instead of defending it using parliament speech as alibi?



Here is a statement by the Ministry of Home Affairs regarding the case:

The notice of a civil suit has been served on the Government by the counsel for the family of the late Dinesh Raman s/o Chinnaiah on September 12, 2013.

The Government's position on the incident has been made clear in Parliament by the 2nd Minister for Home Affairs S Iswaran on August 12, 2013. In sentencing the officer, the District Judge has also noted that there was no motive or intention to cause serious injury or the death of the deceased. This is also consistent with the pathologist's report on the cause of Dinesh Raman's death.
 

wendychan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Re: Why MHA is commenting on the writ filed by Dinesh's family is untrue?

they HAVE to defend since if they don't, the plaintiff gets judgement by default, so yes, it is funny that they issue statement... after all they are a big entity, so no end of money for lawyers , no problem going the whole hog in defending themselves
 

csi88

Alfrescian
Loyal
what yellow ribbon are they talking about? So many wardens involved and only 1 charge furthermore cann continue to work after charged.CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG.
 

csi88

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Why MHA is commenting on the writ filed by Dinesh's family is untrue?

I really hope Lawyer Ravi can seek justice for the dead inmate family.
 

tyudm

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Why MHA is commenting on the writ filed by Dinesh's family is untrue?

they HAVE to defend since if they don't, the plaintiff gets judgement by default, so yes, it is funny that they issue statement... after all they are a big entity, so no end of money for lawyers , no problem going the whole hog in defending themselves

On the contrary, the govt may get AG to throw out the case. Issue closed by default.
 

wendychan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Re: Why MHA is commenting on the writ filed by Dinesh's family is untrue?

On the contrary, the govt may get AG to throw out the case. Issue closed by default.

ah yes, i wish i could get ag to throw out cases too.....
 

TopSage

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Why MHA is commenting on the writ filed by Dinesh's family is untrue?

Which allegation is true under writ of summons filed?
If all allegations were true in writs why waste time and money on Kong Hee & the gang?
Shouldn't MHA respect the law of the country and defend it in court instead of defending it using parliament speech as alibi?



Here is a statement by the Ministry of Home Affairs regarding the case:

The notice of a civil suit has been served on the Government by the counsel for the family of the late Dinesh Raman s/o Chinnaiah on September 12, 2013.

The Government's position on the incident has been made clear in Parliament by the 2nd Minister for Home Affairs S Iswaran on August 12, 2013. In sentencing the officer, the District Judge has also noted that there was no motive or intention to cause serious injury or the death of the deceased. This is also consistent with the pathologist's report on the cause of Dinesh Raman's death.

It is shameful they hide under a cover of session in parliament and the earlier narrow judgement of district court judge - in the first place the accusations in the writ has just surfaced how can it be possible that the earlier judgement already determined the facts surrounding these when none of the earlier processes involve determining the truth of events in the writ.

It is quite ridiculous our govt ministries are behaving this way.
 

TopSage

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Why MHA is commenting on the writ filed by Dinesh's family is untrue?

On the contrary, the govt may get AG to throw out the case. Issue closed by default.

Its a good way to sink the credibility of this govt. By now many Singaporeans are familiar with the case and the evidence the govt has for this case. It is hard to convince them there is no cover up unless more evidence can be shown. If they try to bury it, it sends a certain message to the people....earlier they were trying to compensate the mother to get her to stop her actions...luckily she had the courage to seek justice.
 
Top